• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价 2007-2014 年英国国民保健服务资源分配政策变化对可避免死亡率不平等的影响:时间序列分析。

Evaluating effects of recent changes in NHS resource allocation policy on inequalities in amenable mortality in England, 2007-2014: time-series analysis.

机构信息

Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Feb;73(2):162-167. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211141. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2018-211141
PMID:30470698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6352397/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health investment in England post-2010 has increased at lower rates than previously, with proportionally less being allocated to deprived areas. This study seeks to explore the impact of this on inequalities in amenable mortality between local areas.

METHODS

We undertook a time-series analysis across 324 lower-tier local authorities in England, evaluating the impact of changes in funding allocations to health commissioners from 2007 to 2014 on spatial inequalities in age-standardised under-75 mortality rates for conditions amenable to healthcare for men and women, adjusting for trends in household income, unemployment and time-trends.

RESULTS

More deprived areas received proportionally more funding between 2007 and 2014, though the reorganisation of commissioning in 2012 stalled this. Funding increases to more deprived local areas accounted for a statistically significant reduction in inequalities in male amenable mortality between local areas of 13 deaths per 100 000 (95% CI 2.5 to 25.9). Funding changes were associated with a reduction in inequalities in female amenable mortality of 7.0 per 100,000, though this finding did not reach significance (p=0.09).

CONCLUSION

Current National Health Service (NHS) resource allocation policy in England appears to be contributing to a convergence in health outcomes between affluent and deprived areas. However, careful surveillance is needed to evaluate whether diminished allocations to more deprived areas in recent years and reduced NHS investment as a whole is impacting adversely on inequalities between groups.

摘要

背景

2010 年后,英国的卫生投资增长速度低于以往,分配给贫困地区的比例也相应减少。本研究旨在探讨这对各地区可治疗死亡率不平等的影响。

方法

我们对英格兰 324 个低级别地方当局进行了时间序列分析,评估了 2007 年至 2014 年卫生专员资金分配变化对男性和女性可治疗疾病年龄标准化 75 岁以下死亡率空间不平等的影响,调整了家庭收入、失业率和时间趋势的趋势。

结果

2007 年至 2014 年,较贫困地区获得的资金比例更高,尽管 2012 年的招标重组使其停顿。向较贫困地区提供更多资金,导致地区间男性可治疗死亡率不平等减少了 13 人每 10 万(95%CI 2.5 至 25.9),具有统计学意义。资金变化与女性可治疗死亡率不平等减少 7.0 人每 10 万相关,但这一发现没有达到显著性(p=0.09)。

结论

英国国民保健制度(NHS)目前的资源分配政策似乎正在促使富裕和贫困地区的健康结果趋同。然而,需要进行仔细监测,以评估近年来对较贫困地区的分配减少以及整个 NHS 投资减少是否对群体间的不平等产生不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8420/6352397/8d2ff5556fe5/jech-2018-211141f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8420/6352397/62fe9f7bd51f/jech-2018-211141f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8420/6352397/a309abbab4a4/jech-2018-211141f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8420/6352397/8d2ff5556fe5/jech-2018-211141f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8420/6352397/62fe9f7bd51f/jech-2018-211141f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8420/6352397/a309abbab4a4/jech-2018-211141f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8420/6352397/8d2ff5556fe5/jech-2018-211141f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating effects of recent changes in NHS resource allocation policy on inequalities in amenable mortality in England, 2007-2014: time-series analysis.评价 2007-2014 年英国国民保健服务资源分配政策变化对可避免死亡率不平等的影响:时间序列分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Feb;73(2):162-167. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211141. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
2
The impact of NHS resource allocation policy on health inequalities in England 2001-11: longitudinal ecological study.NHS 资源分配政策对英格兰 2001-11 年卫生不平等状况的影响:纵向生态研究。
BMJ. 2014 May 27;348:g3231. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3231.
3
The impact of New Labour's English health inequalities strategy on geographical inequalities in infant mortality: a time-trend analysis.新工党英语卫生不平等战略对婴儿死亡率的地理不平等的影响:时间趋势分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jun;73(6):564-568. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211679. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
4
Can higher NHS spending in deprived areas reduce health inequalities?英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)在贫困地区增加支出能否减少健康不平等现象?
BMJ. 2014 May 29;348:g3388. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3388.
5
Contributions of diseases and injuries to widening life expectancy inequalities in England from 2001 to 2016: a population-based analysis of vital registration data.2001 年至 2016 年期间,英格兰因疾病和伤害导致的预期寿命不平等差距扩大的贡献:基于人口的生命登记数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Dec;3(12):e586-e597. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30214-7. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
6
Assessing the impact of rising child poverty on the unprecedented rise in infant mortality in England, 2000-2017: time trend analysis.评估2000 - 2017年儿童贫困加剧对英格兰婴儿死亡率空前上升的影响:时间趋势分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 2;9(10):e029424. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029424.
7
How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England.全民健康系统如何减少不平等:来自英国的经验教训。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jul;70(7):637-43. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206742. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
8
Impact on health inequalities of rising prosperity in England 1998-2007, and implications for performance incentives: longitudinal ecological study.英格兰 1998-2007 年繁荣发展对健康不平等的影响及其对绩效激励的启示:纵向生态研究。
BMJ. 2012 Dec 4;345:e7831. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7831.
9
Are local public expenditure reductions associated with increases in inequality in emergency hospitalisation? Time-series analysis of English local authorities from 2010 to 2017.地方公共支出削减是否与急诊住院治疗不平等加剧有关?2010 年至 2017 年英国地方当局的时间序列分析。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jun 20;41(7):389-396. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212845.
10
A case study of new approaches to address health inequalities: Due North five years on.解决健康不平等问题新方法的案例研究:北方五年。
Br Med Bull. 2019 Dec 11;132(1):17-31. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldz037.

引用本文的文献

1
'Two sides of the same coin'? A longitudinal analysis evaluating whether financial austerity accelerated NHS privatisation in England 2013-2020.“同一枚硬币的两面”?一项纵向分析,评估2013年至2020年期间财政紧缩是否加速了英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的私有化进程。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Jul 16;2(1):e000964. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-000964. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
How much do local health systems matter? Variations in amenable mortality across health districts in Aotearoa New Zealand.地方卫生系统有多重要?新西兰奥特亚罗瓦各卫生区可避免死亡率的差异。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Aug 26;8:100545. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100545. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of health and social care spending constraints on mortality in England: a time trend analysis.英国医疗与社会护理支出限制对死亡率的影响:一项时间趋势分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e017722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017722.
2
Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in amenable mortality in Switzerland with international comparisons.瑞士可避免死亡的趋势及社会经济不平等状况与国际比较
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Aug 3;147:w14478. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14478. eCollection 2017.
3
Investigating the impact of the English health inequalities strategy: time trend analysis.
Are local public expenditure reductions associated with increases in inequality in emergency hospitalisation? Time-series analysis of English local authorities from 2010 to 2017.
地方公共支出削减是否与急诊住院治疗不平等加剧有关?2010 年至 2017 年英国地方当局的时间序列分析。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jun 20;41(7):389-396. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212845.
4
Socioeconomic inequalities in avoidable mortality in Italy: results from a nationwide longitudinal cohort.意大利可避免死亡中的社会经济不平等:一项全国性纵向队列研究的结果
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 11;24(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18205-6.
5
Essential cancer medicines and cancer outcomes: Cross-sectional study of 124 countries.基本癌症药物与癌症结局:124 个国家的横断面研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Nov;12(22):20745-20758. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6642. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
6
How International Health System Austerity Responses to the 2008 Financial Crisis Impacted Health System and Workforce Resilience - A Realist Review.2008 年金融危机国际卫生体系紧缩应对措施如何影响卫生系统和劳动力韧性——一个现实主义的综述。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7420. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7420. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
7
Understanding the relationships between health spending, treatable mortality and economic productivity in OECD countries.了解经合组织国家卫生支出、可治疗死亡率和经济生产力之间的关系。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;10:1036058. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1036058. eCollection 2022.
8
Social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: An economic analysis.基层医疗中经常就诊者的社会处方:经济分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;10:902199. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902199. eCollection 2022.
9
Socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: how do they translate into Number of Life-Years Lost?癌症生存的社会经济不平等:它们如何转化为生命年损失数?
Br J Cancer. 2022 Jun;126(10):1490-1498. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01720-x. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
10
Age specific trends in mortality disparities by socio-economic deprivation in small geographical areas of England, 2002-2018: A retrospective registry study.2002 - 2018年英格兰小地理区域内社会经济剥夺导致的死亡率差异的年龄特异性趋势:一项回顾性登记研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jun 7;7:100136. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100136. eCollection 2021 Aug.
调查英国健康不平等战略的影响:时间趋势分析
BMJ. 2017 Jul 26;358:j3310. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3310.
4
Trends In Inequalities In Mortality Amenable To Health Care In 17 European Countries.17 个欧洲国家可归因于医疗保健的死亡率不平等趋势。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jun 1;36(6):1110-1118. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1674.
5
Did the English strategy reduce inequalities in health? A difference-in-difference analysis comparing England with three other European countries.英国的策略是否减少了健康方面的不平等?一项将英国与其他三个欧洲国家进行比较的双重差分分析。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):865. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3505-z.
6
Austerity and old-age mortality in England: a longitudinal cross-local area analysis, 2007-2013.英国的财政紧缩与老年死亡率:2007 - 2013年纵向跨地区分析
J R Soc Med. 2016 Mar;109(3):109-16. doi: 10.1177/0141076816632215.
7
How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England.全民健康系统如何减少不平等:来自英国的经验教训。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jul;70(7):637-43. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206742. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
8
Trends in mental health inequalities in England during a period of recession, austerity and welfare reform 2004 to 2013.2004年至2013年经济衰退、财政紧缩和福利改革期间英格兰心理健康不平等状况的趋势
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
9
The impact of NHS resource allocation policy on health inequalities in England 2001-11: longitudinal ecological study.NHS 资源分配政策对英格兰 2001-11 年卫生不平等状况的影响:纵向生态研究。
BMJ. 2014 May 27;348:g3231. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3231.
10
The impact of increasing health insurance coverage on disparities in mortality: health care reform in Colombia, 1998-2007.医疗保险覆盖范围扩大对死亡率差异的影响:哥伦比亚的医疗改革,1998-2007 年。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Mar;103(3):e100-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301143. Epub 2013 Jan 17.