Bortolatto J F, Pretel H, Floros M C, Luizzi A C C, Dantas A A R, Fernandez E, Moncada G, de Oliveira O B
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP, Univ Estadual Paulista, Brazil
NUPEN, Resea.
J Dent Res. 2014 Jul;93(7 Suppl):66S-71S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514537466. Epub 2014 May 27.
The purpose of this randomized double-blinded clinical trial was to test the efficacy and tooth sensitivity promoted by the use of an in-office 15% H(2)O(2) bleaching agent containing nanoparticles of TiO_N photocatalyzed with LED/laser light (HP15) and a control of 35% H2O2 (HP35).
Forty healthy volunteers, both sexes, aged 18 to 25 yr, were randomly distributed in 2 groups: HP15 (n = 20) was treated in 3 sessions of 48 min each, and HP35 (n = 20) was treated in 3 sessions of 45 min each. The efficacy (E) was evaluated by ΔE values measured via reflectance spectroscopy. The tooth sensitivity (S) was analyzed by visual analog scale (low, average, high, very high). The absolute risk reduction and the number needed to treat index were calculated. The data were analyzed by mixed repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni-correction t test (α = 0.05).
For the efficacy, significant differences were found for number of bleaching sessions (p = .0001; [Formula: see text] = 0.73 and π = 1.000) and for the interaction of number of sessions and bleaching protocols (p = .0001; [Formula: see text] = 0.319 and π = 1.000. The tooth sensitivity level showed significant differences only between the bleaching protocols. Absolute risk reduction calculated was 52% and number needed to treat, 1.92.
The bleaching agent with the lower concentration (HP15) promoted lower levels of tooth sensitivity and presented greater efficacy compared to the control (HP35) in patients between 18 and 25 yr old. The limitation of short-term evaluation did not provide information about the longevity of the tooth bleaching (Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry Re Bec no. U1111-1150-4466).
本随机双盲临床试验的目的是测试使用含TiO_N纳米颗粒且经LED/激光光催化的诊室用15% H₂O₂漂白剂(HP15)和35% H₂O₂对照剂(HP35)的效果及牙齿敏感度。
40名年龄在18至25岁的健康志愿者(男女不限)被随机分为2组:HP15组(n = 20),每组接受3次每次48分钟的治疗;HP35组(n = 20),每组接受3次每次45分钟的治疗。通过反射光谱法测量的ΔE值评估疗效(E)。通过视觉模拟量表(低、中、高、非常高)分析牙齿敏感度(S)。计算绝对风险降低率和治疗所需人数指标。数据采用混合重复测量方差分析及Bonferroni校正t检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。
在疗效方面,漂白疗程数存在显著差异(p = 0.0001;[公式:见原文] = 0.73且π = 1.000),疗程数与漂白方案的交互作用也存在显著差异(p = 0.0001;[公式:见原文] = 0.319且π = 1.000)。牙齿敏感度水平仅在漂白方案之间存在显著差异。计算得出的绝对风险降低率为52%,治疗所需人数为1.92。
与对照组(HP35)相比,低浓度漂白剂(HP15)在18至25岁患者中导致的牙齿敏感度较低,且疗效更佳。短期评估的局限性未提供有关牙齿漂白持久性的信息(巴西临床试验注册中心注册号Re Bec no. U1111 - 1150 - 4466)。