Suppr超能文献

三种静脉输液管路加温器的体外评估

In vitro evaluation of three intravenous fluid line warmers.

作者信息

Lee Rebecca A, Towle Millard Heather A, Weil Ann B, Lantz Gary, Constable Peter, Lescun Timothy B, Weng Hsin-Yi

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.

出版信息

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014 Jun 15;244(12):1423-8. doi: 10.2460/javma.244.12.1423.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine in vitro output temperature differences of 3 IV fluid warmers.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SAMPLE

3 IV fluid warmers.

PROCEDURES

Warming capabilities of a distance-dependent blood and fluid warmer marketed for human and veterinary use (product A) and a veterinary-specific distance-dependent fluid warmer (product B) were compared at 0, 4, 8, and 12 cm from the device to the test vein and at flow rates of 20, 60, 100, 140, 180, 220, 260, and 300 mL/h with room temperature (approx 22°C) fluids (phase 1). The superior warming device was compared against a distance-independent IV fluid warmer (product C) with room temperature fluids at the same flow rates (phase 2). The effect of prewarmed fluids (38°C) versus room temperature fluids was evaluated with the superior warming device from phase 2 (phase 3).

RESULTS

In phase 1, product B produced significantly warmer fluids than product A for all flow rates and distances. Both distance-dependent devices produced warmer fluid at 0 cm, compared with 4, 8, and 12 cm. In phase 2, product B produced warmer fluid than product C at 60, 100, 140, and 180 mL/h. In phase 3, there was no significant benefit to use of prewarmed fluids versus room temperature fluids. Output temperatures ≥ 36.4°C were achieved for all rates ≥ 60 mL/h.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Product B had superior warming capabilities. Placing the fluid warmer close to the patient is recommended. Use of prewarmed fluids had no benefit. Lower IV fluid flow rates resulted in lower output fluid temperatures.

摘要

目的

测定3种静脉输液加温器的体外输出温度差异。

设计

前瞻性随机研究。

样本

3种静脉输液加温器。

方法

比较一种适用于人和兽医的距离依赖型血液和液体加温器(产品A)以及一种兽医专用的距离依赖型液体加温器(产品B)在距设备至测试静脉0、4、8和12厘米处,以及流速为20、60、100、140、180、220、260和300毫升/小时时,使用室温(约22°C)液体的加温能力(第1阶段)。将性能更优的加温器与一种非距离依赖型静脉输液加温器(产品C)在相同流速下使用室温液体进行比较(第2阶段)。使用第2阶段中性能更优的加温器评估预热液体(38°C)与室温液体的效果(第3阶段)。

结果

在第1阶段,对于所有流速和距离,产品B产生的液体温度明显高于产品A。与4、8和12厘米处相比,两种距离依赖型设备在0厘米处产生的液体温度更高。在第2阶段,产品B在流速为60、100、140和180毫升/小时时产生的液体温度高于产品C。在第3阶段,使用预热液体与室温液体相比没有显著益处。所有流速≥60毫升/小时时均达到了≥36.4°C的输出温度。

结论及临床意义

产品B具有更优的加温能力。建议将液体加温器放置在靠近患者的位置。使用预热液体没有益处。较低的静脉输液流速导致较低的输出液体温度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验