Suppr超能文献

气味辨别测试的跨文化管理

Cross-Cultural Administration of an Odor Discrimination Test.

作者信息

Sorokowska Agnieszka, Sorokowski Piotr, Hummel Thomas

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wroclaw, Poland ; TU Dresden, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell & Taste Clinic, Dresden, Germany.

Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Chemosens Percept. 2014;7(2):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s12078-014-9169-0. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

Abstract

Olfactory sensitivity can be evaluated by various tests, with "Sniffin' Sticks" test (SST) being one of the most popular. SST consists of tests for odor threshold, discrimination, and identification. It seems relatively straightforward to administer threshold tests in different groups and societies and it has been shown that odor identification tests requires special adaptation before they can be administered to various populations. However, few studies have investigated the application of an odor discrimination task in various regions/cultures. In the present study, we compared the discrimination scores of 169 Polish people with the scores of 99 Tsimane', Bolivian Amerindians. The Tsimane' participants scored very low in the discrimination task, despite their general high olfactory sensitivity. This result suggests that when a discrimination task is chosen as the form of olfactory testing, some additional variables need to be controlled. We suggest three sources of low scores of our participants-their cognitive profile, the cultural background, i.e., little knowledge of the odors used in the discrimination test and problems associated with testing environment.

摘要

嗅觉灵敏度可以通过各种测试来评估,“嗅棒”测试(SST)是最常用的测试之一。SST包括气味阈值、辨别和识别测试。在不同群体和社会中进行阈值测试似乎相对简单,并且已经表明,气味识别测试在应用于不同人群之前需要进行特殊调整。然而,很少有研究调查气味辨别任务在不同地区/文化中的应用。在本研究中,我们比较了169名波兰人与99名玻利维亚美洲印第安人齐曼内人的辨别分数。尽管齐曼内人参与者的总体嗅觉灵敏度较高,但他们在辨别任务中的得分非常低。这一结果表明,当选择辨别任务作为嗅觉测试的形式时,需要控制一些额外的变量。我们提出了参与者得分低的三个原因——他们的认知特征、文化背景,即对辨别测试中使用的气味了解甚少,以及与测试环境相关的问题。

相似文献

1
Cross-Cultural Administration of an Odor Discrimination Test.
Chemosens Percept. 2014;7(2):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s12078-014-9169-0. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
2
Cultural Adaptation of the Iranian Version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" Olfactory Test.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Nov 17;35:153. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.153. eCollection 2021.
4
Cross-cultural application of the "Sniffin' Sticks" odor identification test.
Am J Rhinol. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):570-3. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3075.
5
[Polish version of the Sniffin' Sticks Test - adaptation and normalization].
Otolaryngol Pol. 2014 Nov-Dec;68(6):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.otpol.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
7
Determinants of human olfactory performance: a cross-cultural study.
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 15;506-507:196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.027. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
8
Danish validation of sniffin' sticks olfactory test for threshold, discrimination, and identification.
Laryngoscope. 2018 Aug;128(8):1759-1766. doi: 10.1002/lary.27052. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
9
Olfactory functioning in early multiple sclerosis: Sniffin' Sticks Test study.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Aug 26;12:2143-7. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S116195. eCollection 2016.
10
The applicability of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test in a Turkish population.
Med Sci Monit. 2013 Dec 30;19:1221-6. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889838.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital adaptation of odor identification test: Current knowledge, gaps, and initial insights from a DAC global cohort.
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2025 Aug 18;9:25424823251362132. doi: 10.1177/25424823251362132. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Odour and indoor air quality hazards in railway cars: an Australian mixed methods case study.
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2024 Jun 24;22(2):503-517. doi: 10.1007/s40201-024-00908-y. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Current Perspectives on Olfactory Loss in Atypical Parkinsonisms-A Review Article.
Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 4;12(10):2257. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102257.
5
How well can young adults and children discriminate between odors?
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov;88(8):2360-2375. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01981-6. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
10
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Apr;12(4):327-680. doi: 10.1002/alr.22929.

本文引用的文献

1
Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language.
Cognition. 2014 Feb;130(2):266-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.004.
3
Background sound modulates the performance of odor discrimination task.
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jul;212(2):305-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2729-5. Epub 2011 May 21.
4
The weirdest people in the world?
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
5
Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Dec;32(10):1062-7. doi: 10.1080/13803391003683070. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
6
An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction.
Chem Senses. 2010 Jan;35(1):3-20. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjp083. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
9
The importance of chemosensory clues in Aguaruna tree classification and identification.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008 May 3;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-12.
10
Cross-cultural application of the "Sniffin' Sticks" odor identification test.
Am J Rhinol. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):570-3. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3075.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验