• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cross-Cultural Administration of an Odor Discrimination Test.气味辨别测试的跨文化管理
Chemosens Percept. 2014;7(2):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s12078-014-9169-0. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
2
Cultural Adaptation of the Iranian Version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" Olfactory Test.伊朗版“嗅觉棒”嗅觉测试的文化适应性
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Nov 17;35:153. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.153. eCollection 2021.
3
Olfaction and environment: Tsimane' of Bolivian rainforest have lower threshold of odor detection than industrialized German people.嗅觉与环境:玻利维亚雨林中的提斯曼人比工业化的德国人群的气味探测阈限更低。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e69203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069203. Print 2013.
4
Cross-cultural application of the "Sniffin' Sticks" odor identification test.“嗅觉棒”嗅觉识别测试的跨文化应用
Am J Rhinol. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):570-3. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3075.
5
[Polish version of the Sniffin' Sticks Test - adaptation and normalization].[嗅觉棒测试波兰语版本 - 改编与标准化]
Otolaryngol Pol. 2014 Nov-Dec;68(6):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.otpol.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
6
Spanish Validation for Olfactory Function Testing Using the Sniffin' Sticks Olfactory Test: Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification.使用嗅棒嗅觉测试进行嗅觉功能测试的西班牙语验证:阈值、辨别力和识别力。
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):943. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120943.
7
Determinants of human olfactory performance: a cross-cultural study.人类嗅觉表现的决定因素:一项跨文化研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 15;506-507:196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.027. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
8
Danish validation of sniffin' sticks olfactory test for threshold, discrimination, and identification.丹麦对嗅觉棒嗅觉测试在阈值、辨别力和识别方面的验证。
Laryngoscope. 2018 Aug;128(8):1759-1766. doi: 10.1002/lary.27052. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
9
Olfactory functioning in early multiple sclerosis: Sniffin' Sticks Test study.早期多发性硬化症的嗅觉功能:“嗅棒”测试研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Aug 26;12:2143-7. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S116195. eCollection 2016.
10
The applicability of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test in a Turkish population.“嗅探棒”嗅觉测试在土耳其人群中的适用性。
Med Sci Monit. 2013 Dec 30;19:1221-6. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889838.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital adaptation of odor identification test: Current knowledge, gaps, and initial insights from a DAC global cohort.嗅觉识别测试的数字适应性:DAC全球队列的当前知识、差距和初步见解
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2025 Aug 18;9:25424823251362132. doi: 10.1177/25424823251362132. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Odour and indoor air quality hazards in railway cars: an Australian mixed methods case study.铁路车厢内的气味与室内空气质量危害:一项澳大利亚的混合方法案例研究。
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2024 Jun 24;22(2):503-517. doi: 10.1007/s40201-024-00908-y. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Current Perspectives on Olfactory Loss in Atypical Parkinsonisms-A Review Article.非典型帕金森综合征嗅觉丧失的当前观点——一篇综述文章
Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 4;12(10):2257. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102257.
4
Qualitative and Quantitative Sex-Related Differences in the Perception of Single Molecules from Coffee Headspace.咖啡顶空单分子感知中的定性和定量性别相关差异。
Foods. 2024 Oct 11;13(20):3239. doi: 10.3390/foods13203239.
5
How well can young adults and children discriminate between odors?年轻人和儿童对气味的辨别能力如何?
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov;88(8):2360-2375. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01981-6. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
6
Is the perception of odour pleasantness shared across cultures and ecological conditions? Evidence from Amazonia, East Africa, New Guinea, Malaysia and Poland.不同文化和生态条件下对气味宜人度的感知是否相同?来自亚马孙地区、东非、新几内亚、马来西亚和波兰的证据。
Biol Lett. 2024 Jun;20(6):20240120. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0120. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
7
Effect of the Polymorphism of the Human Gene on Olfactory Function and BMI in Different Age Groups.人类基因多态性对不同年龄组嗅觉功能和 BMI 的影响。
Nutrients. 2024 Mar 13;16(6):821. doi: 10.3390/nu16060821.
8
Application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to Elucidate the Connections among Smell, Obesity with Related Metabolic Alterations, and Eating Habit in Patients with Weight Excess.应用人工神经网络(ANN)阐明超重患者嗅觉、肥胖及其相关代谢改变与饮食习惯之间的联系。
Metabolites. 2023 Jan 30;13(2):206. doi: 10.3390/metabo13020206.
9
Olfactory Sensitivity Is Associated with Body Mass Index and Polymorphism in the Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels .嗅觉敏感性与体重指数和电压门控钾通道多态性有关。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 24;14(23):4986. doi: 10.3390/nu14234986.
10
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.国际过敏与鼻科学学会共识声明:嗅觉。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Apr;12(4):327-680. doi: 10.1002/alr.22929.

本文引用的文献

1
Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language.只要你掌握了恰当的语言,气味是可以用语言表达出来的。
Cognition. 2014 Feb;130(2):266-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.004.
2
Olfaction and environment: Tsimane' of Bolivian rainforest have lower threshold of odor detection than industrialized German people.嗅觉与环境:玻利维亚雨林中的提斯曼人比工业化的德国人群的气味探测阈限更低。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e69203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069203. Print 2013.
3
Background sound modulates the performance of odor discrimination task.背景音调节气味辨别任务的表现。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jul;212(2):305-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2729-5. Epub 2011 May 21.
4
The weirdest people in the world?世界上最奇怪的人?
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
5
Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks.气味检测、气味辨别和气味识别任务中的认知因素。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Dec;32(10):1062-7. doi: 10.1080/13803391003683070. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
6
An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction.人类嗅觉功能的初步评估。
Chem Senses. 2010 Jan;35(1):3-20. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjp083. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
7
Cultural adaptation of an olfactory identification test: the Greek version of Sniffin' Sticks.嗅觉识别测试的文化适应性:希腊版嗅觉棒测试
Rhinology. 2008 Dec;46(4):292-6.
8
Odour identification and discrimination in Dutch adults over 45 years.45岁以上荷兰成年人的气味识别与辨别能力
Rhinology. 2008 Jun;46(2):131-6.
9
The importance of chemosensory clues in Aguaruna tree classification and identification.化学感应线索在阿瓜鲁纳树木分类和识别中的重要性。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008 May 3;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-12.
10
Cross-cultural application of the "Sniffin' Sticks" odor identification test.“嗅觉棒”嗅觉识别测试的跨文化应用
Am J Rhinol. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):570-3. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3075.

气味辨别测试的跨文化管理

Cross-Cultural Administration of an Odor Discrimination Test.

作者信息

Sorokowska Agnieszka, Sorokowski Piotr, Hummel Thomas

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wroclaw, Poland ; TU Dresden, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell & Taste Clinic, Dresden, Germany.

Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Chemosens Percept. 2014;7(2):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s12078-014-9169-0. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1007/s12078-014-9169-0
PMID:24883170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4037584/
Abstract

Olfactory sensitivity can be evaluated by various tests, with "Sniffin' Sticks" test (SST) being one of the most popular. SST consists of tests for odor threshold, discrimination, and identification. It seems relatively straightforward to administer threshold tests in different groups and societies and it has been shown that odor identification tests requires special adaptation before they can be administered to various populations. However, few studies have investigated the application of an odor discrimination task in various regions/cultures. In the present study, we compared the discrimination scores of 169 Polish people with the scores of 99 Tsimane', Bolivian Amerindians. The Tsimane' participants scored very low in the discrimination task, despite their general high olfactory sensitivity. This result suggests that when a discrimination task is chosen as the form of olfactory testing, some additional variables need to be controlled. We suggest three sources of low scores of our participants-their cognitive profile, the cultural background, i.e., little knowledge of the odors used in the discrimination test and problems associated with testing environment.

摘要

嗅觉灵敏度可以通过各种测试来评估,“嗅棒”测试(SST)是最常用的测试之一。SST包括气味阈值、辨别和识别测试。在不同群体和社会中进行阈值测试似乎相对简单,并且已经表明,气味识别测试在应用于不同人群之前需要进行特殊调整。然而,很少有研究调查气味辨别任务在不同地区/文化中的应用。在本研究中,我们比较了169名波兰人与99名玻利维亚美洲印第安人齐曼内人的辨别分数。尽管齐曼内人参与者的总体嗅觉灵敏度较高,但他们在辨别任务中的得分非常低。这一结果表明,当选择辨别任务作为嗅觉测试的形式时,需要控制一些额外的变量。我们提出了参与者得分低的三个原因——他们的认知特征、文化背景,即对辨别测试中使用的气味了解甚少,以及与测试环境相关的问题。