Suppr超能文献

埃德蒙顿家庭优先试验(FFE)方案:一项基于社区的随机试验,比较针对低收入家庭的四种服务整合方法。

The protocol for the Families First Edmonton trial (FFE): a randomized community-based trial to compare four service integration approaches for families with low-income.

作者信息

Drummond Jane, Schnirer Laurie, So Sylvia, Mayan Maria, Williamson Deanna L, Bisanz Jeffrey, Fassbender Konrad, Wiebe Natasha

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton Alberta, AB T6G 1C9, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 19;14:223. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-223.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Families with low incomes experience an array of health and social challenges that compromise their resilience and lead to negative family outcomes. Along with financial constraints, there are barriers associated with mental and physical health, poorer education and language. In addition, vulnerable populations experience many services as markedly unhelpful. This combination of family and service barriers results in reduced opportunities for effective, primary-level services and an increased use of more expensive secondary-level services (e.g., emergency room visits, child apprehensions, police involvement). A systematic review of effective interventions demonstrated that promotion of physical and mental health using existing service was critically important.

METHODS/DESIGN: The Families First Edmonton Trial (FFE) tests four service integration approaches to increase use of available health and social services for families with low-income. It is a randomized, two-factor, single-blind, longitudinal effectiveness trial where low-income families (1168) were randomly assigned to receive either (1) Family Healthy Lifestyle plus Family Recreation service integration (Comprehensive), (2) Family Healthy Lifestyle service integration, (3) Family Recreation service integration, or (4) existing services. To be eligible families needed to be receiving one of five government income assistance programs. The trial was conducted in the City of Edmonton between January 2006 and August 2011. The families were followed for a total of three years of which interventional services were received for between 18 and 24 months. The primary outcome is the number of family linkages to health and social services as measured by a customized survey tool "Family Services Inventory". Secondary outcomes include type and satisfaction with services, cost of services, family member health, and family functioning. Where possible, the measures for secondary outcomes were selected because of their standardization, the presence of published norming data, and their utility as comparators to other studies of low-income families. As an effectiveness trial, community and government partners participated in all committees through a mutually agreed upon governance model and helped manage and problem solve with researchers.

DISCUSSION

Modifications were made to the FFE trial based on the pragmatics of community-based trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00705328.

摘要

背景

低收入家庭面临一系列健康和社会挑战,这些挑战损害了他们的恢复力,并导致负面的家庭结果。除了经济限制外,还存在与心理健康、身体健康、教育程度较低和语言相关的障碍。此外,弱势群体认为许多服务明显没有帮助。家庭和服务障碍的这种结合导致获得有效初级服务的机会减少,而更多地使用更昂贵的二级服务(如急诊室就诊、儿童监护、警方介入)。一项对有效干预措施的系统评价表明,利用现有服务促进身心健康至关重要。

方法/设计:埃德蒙顿家庭第一试验(FFE)测试了四种服务整合方法,以增加低收入家庭对现有健康和社会服务的使用。这是一项随机、双因素、单盲、纵向有效性试验,低收入家庭(1168户)被随机分配接受以下服务之一:(1)家庭健康生活方式加家庭娱乐服务整合(综合组),(2)家庭健康生活方式服务整合,(3)家庭娱乐服务整合,或(4)现有服务。符合条件的家庭需要正在接受五项政府收入援助计划中的一项。该试验于2006年1月至2011年8月在埃德蒙顿市进行。对家庭进行了总共三年的跟踪,其中接受干预服务的时间为18至24个月。主要结果是通过定制的调查工具“家庭服务清单”衡量的家庭与健康和社会服务的联系数量。次要结果包括服务类型和满意度、服务成本、家庭成员健康状况和家庭功能。在可能的情况下,选择次要结果的衡量指标是因为它们的标准化、已发表的常模数据的存在以及它们作为与其他低收入家庭研究的比较指标的效用。作为一项有效性试验,社区和政府合作伙伴通过共同商定的治理模式参与了所有委员会,并帮助研究人员进行管理和解决问题。

讨论

基于社区试验的实际情况对FFE试验进行了修改。

试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00705328。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/973b/4060625/c9420e59e4c0/1472-6963-14-223-1.jpg

相似文献

8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Geographic disparities in children's mental health care.
Pediatrics. 2003 Oct;112(4):e308. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.4.e308.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents: a systematic review.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Aug;90:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.026. Epub 2013 May 4.
2
Systematic review of physical activity and health in the early years (aged 0-4 years).
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Aug;37(4):773-92. doi: 10.1139/h2012-070.
3
Moral codes of mothering and the introduction of welfare-to-work in Ontario.
Can Rev Sociol. 2012 Feb;49(1):26-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-618x.2011.01279.x.
7
Child poverty, health and health care use in Canada.
Paediatr Child Health. 2001 Oct;6(8):509-13. doi: 10.1093/pch/6.8.509.
8
Socioeconomic status and self-reported barriers to mental health service use.
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;52(3):201-6. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200312.
10
The environment of childhood poverty.
Am Psychol. 2004 Feb-Mar;59(2):77-92. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.77.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验