Suppr超能文献

探究亲社会行为的因素结构和病因。

Examining the factor structure and etiology of prosociality.

作者信息

Mikolajewski Amy J, Chavarria Jesus, Moltisanti Allison, Hart Sara A, Taylor Jeanette

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida State University.

Florida Center for Reading Research.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1259-67. doi: 10.1037/a0037132. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

Abstract

Prosociality is one construct included in the developmental propensity model proposed by Lahey and Waldman (2003, 2005) to explain the development of conduct problems in childhood and adolescence. Findings from previous literature on 2 facets of prosociality, dispositional sympathy and respect for rules, suggest that both may have genetic and nonshared environmental influences, but only the latter may have shared environmental influence. The goal of the current article was to explore the structure of the prosociality disposition from a measurement perspective as well as to examine the etiology of this construct. The sample consisted of 686 twin pairs ages 7 to 13. Parents rated their children's prosociality using the Child and Adolescent Dispositions Scale. The factor structure of the prosociality scale was examined using confirmatory factor analysis to compare a 1-factor model with a 2-factor model. Twin analyses were used to examine the proportion of variance associated with genetic and environmental effects on the latent factor(s) from the best fitting model. Results of the current study suggest that prosociality is a disposition that can be conceptualized as 2 related factors rather than a unitary dimension. These 2 factors map onto the subscales of the prosociality dimension (dispositional sympathy and respect for rules). Both factors had significant genetic and nonshared environmental influences, but only respect for rules had significant shared environmental influences. Examining the dispositional sympathy and respect for rules facets of prosociality separately allowed for the discovery that shared environmental factors may have more impact on respect for rules than sympathy.

摘要

亲社会行为是拉希和瓦尔德曼(2003年、2005年)提出的发展倾向模型中包含的一个概念,用于解释儿童和青少年行为问题的发展。以往关于亲社会行为两个方面(特质性同情和对规则的尊重)的文献研究结果表明,这两个方面可能都受到遗传和非共享环境的影响,但只有后者可能受到共享环境的影响。本文的目的是从测量角度探讨亲社会倾向的结构,并研究这一概念的病因。样本包括686对7至13岁的双胞胎。父母使用儿童和青少年特质量表对孩子的亲社会行为进行评分。使用验证性因素分析来检验亲社会量表的因素结构,以比较单因素模型和双因素模型。双胞胎分析用于检验与最佳拟合模型中潜在因素的遗传和环境效应相关的方差比例。当前研究结果表明,亲社会行为是一种可以被概念化为两个相关因素而非单一维度的倾向。这两个因素对应于亲社会维度的子量表(特质性同情和对规则的尊重)。两个因素都有显著的遗传和非共享环境影响,但只有对规则的尊重有显著的共享环境影响。分别考察亲社会行为的特质性同情和对规则的尊重这两个方面,可以发现共享环境因素对尊重规则的影响可能比对同情的影响更大。

相似文献

1
Examining the factor structure and etiology of prosociality.
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1259-67. doi: 10.1037/a0037132. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
2
The Developmental Propensity Model Extends to Oppositional Defiant Disorder: a Twin Study.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Oct;47(10):1611-1623. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00556-z.
4
Common genetic and nonshared environmental factors contribute to the association between socioemotional dispositions and the externalizing factor in children.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;54(1):67-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02621.x. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
6
A meta-analysis of the associations between callous-unemotional traits and empathy, prosociality, and guilt.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Feb;75:101809. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101809. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
7
Daily Deviations in Anger, Guilt, and Sympathy: A Developmental Diary Study of Aggression.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Nov;44(8):1515-1526. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0143-y.

引用本文的文献

3
Empathic Accuracy in Clinical Populations.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 3;11:457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00457. eCollection 2020.
4
The Developmental Propensity Model Extends to Oppositional Defiant Disorder: a Twin Study.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Oct;47(10):1611-1623. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00556-z.
5
Home Environmental and Behavioral Risk Indices for Reading Achievement.
Learn Individ Differ. 2017 Jul;57:9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
2
An update on the Florida State Twin Registry.
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013 Feb;16(1):471-5. doi: 10.1017/thg.2012.74. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
4
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.
Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
5
Genetic influence on literacy constructs in kindergarten and first grade: evidence from a diverse twin sample.
Behav Genet. 2010 Sep;40(5):591-602. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9368-7. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
6
Are there meaningful etiological differences within antisocial behavior? Results of a meta-analysis.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Mar;29(2):163-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.12.004. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
8
Genetic and environmental influences on behavior: capturing all the interplay.
Psychol Rev. 2007 Apr;114(2):423-40. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.423.
9
Aetiology of the relationship between callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems in childhood.
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2007 May;49:s33-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.190.5.s33.
10
The Florida State Twin Registry: research aims and design.
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Dec;9(6):958-62. doi: 10.1375/183242706779462525.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验