• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用德尔格毒品检测5000和Affiniton DrugWipe口腔液毒品筛查设备检测被捕司机的吸毒情况及吸毒率。

Detection and prevalence of drug use in arrested drivers using the Dräger Drug Test 5000 and Affiniton DrugWipe oral fluid drug screening devices.

作者信息

Logan Barry K, Mohr Amanda L A, Talpins Stephen K

机构信息

The Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, Willow Grove, PA, USA NMS Labs, Willow Grove, PA, USA

The Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, Willow Grove, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Anal Toxicol. 2014 Sep;38(7):444-50. doi: 10.1093/jat/bku050. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1093/jat/bku050
PMID:24894458
Abstract

The use of oral fluid (OF) drug testing devices offers the ability to rapidly obtain a drug screening result at the time of a traffic stop. We describe an evaluation of two such devices, the Dräger Drug Test 5000 and the Affiniton DrugWipe, to detect drug use in a cohort of drivers arrested from an investigation of drug impaired driving (n = 92). Overall, 41% of these drivers were ultimately confirmed positive by mass spectrometry for the presence of one or more drugs. The most frequently detected drugs were cannabinoids (30%), benzodiazepines (11%) and cocaine (10%). Thirty-nine percent of drivers with blood alcohol concentrations >0.08 g/100 mL were found to be drug positive. Field test results obtained from OF samples were compared with collected OF and urine samples subsequently analyzed in the laboratory by gas or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The Dräger Drug Test 5000 (DDT5000) and DrugWipe returned overall sensitivities of 51 and 53%, and positive predictive values of 93 and 63%, respectively. The most notable difference in performance was the DDT5000's better sensitivity in detecting marijuana use. Both devices failed to detect benzodiazepine use. Oral fluid proved to be a more effective confirmatory specimen, with more drugs being confirmed in OF than urine.

摘要

使用口腔液(OF)药物检测设备能够在交通拦截时快速获得药物筛查结果。我们描述了对两种此类设备——德格5000药物检测试剂盒和Affiniton药物擦拭试纸——的评估,以检测从一起药物影响驾驶调查中被捕的一组驾驶员(n = 92)的药物使用情况。总体而言,这些驾驶员中有41%最终通过质谱法被确认为一种或多种药物呈阳性。检测到的最常见药物是大麻素(30%)、苯二氮䓬类药物(11%)和可卡因(10%)。血液酒精浓度>0.08 g/100 mL的驾驶员中有39%被发现药物呈阳性。将从口腔液样本获得的现场检测结果与收集的口腔液和尿液样本进行比较,随后在实验室通过气相或液相色谱 - 质谱法进行分析。德格5000药物检测试剂盒(DDT5000)和药物擦拭试纸的总体灵敏度分别为51%和53%,阳性预测值分别为93%和63%。性能上最显著的差异是DDT5000在检测大麻使用方面具有更好的灵敏度。两种设备都未能检测到苯二氮䓬类药物的使用。口腔液被证明是一种更有效的确证样本,与尿液相比,口腔液中被确证的药物更多。

相似文献

1
Detection and prevalence of drug use in arrested drivers using the Dräger Drug Test 5000 and Affiniton DrugWipe oral fluid drug screening devices.使用德尔格毒品检测5000和Affiniton DrugWipe口腔液毒品筛查设备检测被捕司机的吸毒情况及吸毒率。
J Anal Toxicol. 2014 Sep;38(7):444-50. doi: 10.1093/jat/bku050. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
2
Performance evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices in normal police procedure in Germany.德国正常警察程序中现场口腔液药物筛查设备的性能评估
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 May;238:120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
3
Laboratory evaluation and field application of roadside oral fluid collectors and drug testing devices.路边口腔液收集器及药物检测装置的实验室评估与现场应用
Ther Drug Monit. 2008 Apr;30(2):188-95. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181679249.
4
Roadside oral fluid testing: comparison of the results of drugwipe 5 and drugwipe benzodiazepines on-site tests with laboratory confirmation results of oral fluid and whole blood.路边口腔液检测:Drugwipe 5和Drugwipe苯二氮䓬类药物现场检测结果与口腔液和全血实验室确认结果的比较。
Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Mar 5;175(2-3):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.05.022. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
5
Evaluation of on-site oral fluid screening using Drugwipe-5(+), RapidSTAT and Drug Test 5000 for the detection of drugs of abuse in drivers.现场口腔液筛查评估:使用 Drugwipe-5(+)、RapidSTAT 和 Drug Test 5000 检测驾驶员体内的滥用药物。
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 May 20;198(1-3):2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
6
A field test of substance use screening devices as part of routine drunk-driving spot detection operating procedures in South Africa.南非将物质使用筛查设备纳入常规酒驾抽查操作程序的现场测试。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 May 23.
7
Screening for drugs in oral fluid: illicit drug use and drug driving in a sample of Queensland motorists.口腔液中药物筛查:昆士兰驾驶者样本中的非法药物使用与药驾情况
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 May;26(3):301-7. doi: 10.1080/09595230701247764.
8
Opioids in oral fluid of Spanish drivers.唾液中的阿片类药物:西班牙司机的情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jun 1;187:35-39. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
9
Prevalence of psychoactive substances, alcohol, illicit drugs, and medicines, in Spanish drivers: a roadside study.西班牙驾驶员中精神活性物质、酒精、非法药物和药物的流行情况:一项路边研究。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Nov 30;223(1-3):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
10
The use of oral fluid and sweat wipes for the detection of drugs of abuse in drivers.使用口腔液和汗液擦拭物检测驾驶员滥用药物的情况。
J Forensic Sci. 2002 Nov;47(6):1380-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in driving under the influence of cannabis: The role of medical and recreational cannabis use.大麻影响下驾驶的性别差异:医用大麻和娱乐用大麻使用的作用。
Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;110:106525. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106525. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Differences in alcohol cognitions, consumption, and consequences among first-time DUI offenders who co-use alcohol and marijuana.首次酒后驾车且同时使用酒精和大麻的违法者在酒精认知、饮酒量和后果方面的差异。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Oct 1;191:187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 15.