Suppr超能文献

鸽子在无明显反应介导情况下的赢则保留/输则转换和赢则转换/输则保留学习。

Win-stay/lose-shift and win-shift/lose-stay learning by pigeons in the absence of overt response mediation.

作者信息

Randall C K, Zentall T R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 49596, USA.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 1997 Dec;41(3):227-36. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00048-x.

Abstract

Win-stay/lose-shift and win-shift/lose-stay behavior in pigeons was compared using a two-alternative conditional discrimination for which the number of trials involving each of the task components could be precisely controlled. One group was rewarded for pecking the location just pecked if those pecks were followed by food and for pecking the other location if those pecks were not followed by food (win-stay/lose-shift). Another group was rewarded for pecking the location just pecked if those pecks were not followed by food and for pecking the other location if those pecks were followed by food (win-shift/lose-stay). With increasing delay to comparison choice, pigeons were more accurate on trials when initial pecking was followed by the absence of food than by food (Experiment 1). However, when hypothesized overt response mediation was discouraged (Experiment 2), a win-stay superiority effect emerged with increasing delay to comparison choice. Thus, unlike rats, pigeons may be somewhat predisposed to repeat a response to a location to which responses have been previously rewarded.

摘要

使用一种双选条件辨别任务,精确控制涉及每个任务成分的试验次数,比较了鸽子的“赢则停留/输则转换”和“赢则转换/输则停留”行为。如果啄击后有食物,一组鸽子因啄击刚刚啄过的位置而得到奖励;如果啄击后没有食物,则因啄击另一个位置而得到奖励(赢则停留/输则转换)。另一组鸽子,如果啄击后没有食物,因啄击刚刚啄过的位置而得到奖励;如果啄击后有食物,则因啄击另一个位置而得到奖励(赢则转换/输则停留)。随着比较选择延迟时间的增加,与啄击后有食物相比,当最初啄击后没有食物时,鸽子在试验中的表现更准确(实验1)。然而,当抑制假设的明显反应中介作用时(实验2),随着比较选择延迟时间的增加,出现了赢则停留优势效应。因此,与大鼠不同,鸽子可能有点倾向于重复对先前因反应而得到奖励的位置做出反应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验