Randall C K, Zentall T R
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 49596, USA.
Behav Processes. 1997 Dec;41(3):227-36. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00048-x.
Win-stay/lose-shift and win-shift/lose-stay behavior in pigeons was compared using a two-alternative conditional discrimination for which the number of trials involving each of the task components could be precisely controlled. One group was rewarded for pecking the location just pecked if those pecks were followed by food and for pecking the other location if those pecks were not followed by food (win-stay/lose-shift). Another group was rewarded for pecking the location just pecked if those pecks were not followed by food and for pecking the other location if those pecks were followed by food (win-shift/lose-stay). With increasing delay to comparison choice, pigeons were more accurate on trials when initial pecking was followed by the absence of food than by food (Experiment 1). However, when hypothesized overt response mediation was discouraged (Experiment 2), a win-stay superiority effect emerged with increasing delay to comparison choice. Thus, unlike rats, pigeons may be somewhat predisposed to repeat a response to a location to which responses have been previously rewarded.
使用一种双选条件辨别任务,精确控制涉及每个任务成分的试验次数,比较了鸽子的“赢则停留/输则转换”和“赢则转换/输则停留”行为。如果啄击后有食物,一组鸽子因啄击刚刚啄过的位置而得到奖励;如果啄击后没有食物,则因啄击另一个位置而得到奖励(赢则停留/输则转换)。另一组鸽子,如果啄击后没有食物,因啄击刚刚啄过的位置而得到奖励;如果啄击后有食物,则因啄击另一个位置而得到奖励(赢则转换/输则停留)。随着比较选择延迟时间的增加,与啄击后有食物相比,当最初啄击后没有食物时,鸽子在试验中的表现更准确(实验1)。然而,当抑制假设的明显反应中介作用时(实验2),随着比较选择延迟时间的增加,出现了赢则停留优势效应。因此,与大鼠不同,鸽子可能有点倾向于重复对先前因反应而得到奖励的位置做出反应。