Reed Phil
Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Learn Behav. 2016 Dec;44(4):340-346. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0225-2.
Two experiments examined acquisition of win-stay, win-shift, lose-stay, and lose-shift rules by which hungry rats could earn food reinforcement. In Experiment 1, two groups of rats were trained in a two-lever operant task that required them to follow either a win-stay/lose-shift or a win-shift/lose-stay contingency. The rates of acquisition of the individual rules within each contingency differed: lose-shift and lose-stay rules were acquired faster than win-stay and win-shift rules. Contrary to a number of previous reports, the win-shift rule was acquired less rapidly than any of the other rules. In Experiment 2, the four rules were taught separately, but subjects still acquired the win-shift rule more slowly than any of the other rules.
两项实验研究了饥饿的大鼠通过赢则留、赢则变、输则留和输则变规则来获取食物强化的情况。在实验1中,两组大鼠在双杠杆操作性任务中接受训练,要求它们遵循赢则留/输则变或赢则变/输则留的 contingency 。每种 contingency 中各个规则的习得速度不同:输则变和输则留规则的习得速度比赢则留和赢则变规则更快。与之前的一些报告相反,赢则变规则的习得速度比其他任何规则都要慢。在实验2中,四个规则是分别教授的,但受试者仍然比其他任何规则都更慢地习得赢则变规则。