2001年英格兰和威尔士不同种族之间健康预期寿命的不平等情况。
Inequalities in healthy life expectancy between ethnic groups in England and Wales in 2001.
作者信息
Wohland Pia, Rees Phil, Nazroo James, Jagger Carol
机构信息
a Institute for Ageing and Health , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK.
出版信息
Ethn Health. 2015;20(4):341-53. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2014.921892. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
OBJECTIVES
We aim to develop robust estimates of disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) and healthy life expectancy (HLE) for ethnic groups in England and Wales in 2001 and to examine observed variations across ethnic groups.
DESIGN
DFLE and HLE by age and gender for five-year age groups were computed for 16 ethnic groups by combining the 2001 Census data on ethnicity, self-reported limiting long-term illness and self-rated health using mortality by ethnic group estimated by two methods: the Standardised Illness Ratio (SIR) method and the Geographically Weighted Method (GWM).
RESULTS
The SIR and GWM methods differed somewhat in their estimates of life expectancy (LE) at birth but produced very similar estimates of DFLE and HLE by ethnic group. For the more conservative method (GWM), the range in DFLE at birth was 10.5 years for men and 11.9 years for women, double that in LE. DFLE at birth was highest for Chinese men (64.7 years, 95% CI 64.0-65.3) and women (67.0 years, 95% CI 66.4-67.6). Over half of the ethnic minority groups (men: 10; women: 9) had significantly lower DFLE at birth than White British men (61.7 years, 95% CI 61.7-61.7) or women (64.1 years, 95% CI 64.1-64.2), mostly the Black, Asian and mixed ethnic groups. The lowest DFLE observed was for Bangladeshi men (54.3 years, 95% CI 53.7-54.8) and Pakistani women (55.1 years, 95% CI 54.8-55.4). Notable were Indian women whose LE was similar to White British women but who had 4.3 years less disability-free (95% CI 4.0-4.6).
CONCLUSIONS
Inequalities in DFLE between ethnic groups are large and exceed those in LE. Moreover, certain ethnic groups have a larger burden of disability that does not seem to be associated with shorter LE. With the increasing population of the non-White British community, it is essential to be able to identify the ethnic groups at higher risk of disability, in order to target appropriate interventions.
目标
我们旨在对2001年英格兰和威尔士各民族的无残疾预期寿命(DFLE)和健康预期寿命(HLE)进行可靠估计,并研究各民族之间观察到的差异。
设计
通过将2001年人口普查中关于种族、自我报告的长期受限疾病和自我评定健康状况的数据,与使用两种方法估计的按种族划分的死亡率相结合,计算了16个种族的按年龄和性别的五岁年龄组的DFLE和HLE:标准化疾病比率(SIR)法和地理加权法(GWM)。
结果
SIR法和GWM法在出生时预期寿命(LE)的估计上有些差异,但在按种族划分的DFLE和HLE估计上非常相似。对于更保守的方法(GWM),出生时DFLE的范围男性为10.5岁,女性为11.9岁,是LE范围的两倍。出生时DFLE最高的是中国男性(64.7岁,95%可信区间64.0 - 65.3)和女性(67.0岁,95%可信区间66.4 - 67.6)。超过一半的少数族裔群体(男性:10个;女性:9个)出生时的DFLE显著低于英国白人男性(61.7岁,95%可信区间61.7 - 61.7)或女性(64.1岁,95%可信区间64.1 - 64.2),主要是黑人、亚洲人和混合族裔群体。观察到的最低DFLE是孟加拉国男性(54.3岁,95%可信区间53.7 - 54.8)和巴基斯坦女性(55.1岁,95%可信区间54.8 - 55.4)。值得注意的是印度女性,其LE与英国白人女性相似,但无残疾时间少4.3年(95%可信区间4.0 - 4.6)。
结论
各民族之间DFLE的不平等很大,超过了LE的不平等。此外,某些民族的残疾负担更大,这似乎与较短的LE无关。随着非英国白人社区人口的增加,能够识别出残疾风险较高的民族至关重要,以便进行适当的干预。