Bharaswadkar Sandeep, Kanchar Avinash, Thakur Narendra, Shah Shubhangi, Patnaik Brinda, Click Eleanor S, Kumar Ajay M V, Dewan Puneet Kumar
Office of the World Health Organization (WHO) Representative in India, New Delhi, India.
Directorate of Health Services, Pune Municipal Corporation, Maharashtra, India.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 4;9(6):e97993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097993. eCollection 2014.
Private Practitioners (PP) are the primary source of health care for patients in India. Limited representative information is available on TB management practices of Indian PP or on the efficacy of India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) to improve the quality of TB management through training of PP.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a systematic random sample of PP in one urban area in Western India (Pune, Maharashtra). We presented sample clinical vignettes and determined the proportions of PPs who reported practices consistent with International Standards of TB Care (ISTC). We examined the association between RNTCP training and adherence to ISTC by calculating odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
Of 3,391 PP practicing allopathic medicine, 249 were interviewed. Of these, 55% had been exposed to RNTCP. For new pulmonary TB patients, 63% (158/249) of provider responses were consistent with ISTC diagnostic practices, and 34% (84/249) of responses were consistent with ISTC treatment practices. However, 48% (120/249) PP also reported use of serological tests for TB diagnosis. In the new TB case vignette, 38% (94/249) PP reported use of at least one second line anti-TB drug in the treatment regimen. RNTCP training was not associated with diagnostic or treatment practices.
In Pune, India, despite a decade of training activities by the RNTCP, high proportions of providers resorted to TB serology for diagnosis and second-line anti-TB drug use in new TB patients. Efforts to achieve universal access to quality TB management must account for the low quality of care by PP and the lack of demonstrated effect of current training efforts.
在印度,私人执业医生是患者医疗保健的主要来源。关于印度私人执业医生的结核病管理实践,或关于印度修订的国家结核病控制规划(RNTCP)通过培训私人执业医生来提高结核病管理质量的效果,可获取的代表性信息有限。
我们对印度西部一个城市地区(马哈拉施特拉邦浦那)的私人执业医生进行了系统随机抽样的横断面调查。我们展示了样本临床病例,并确定报告的实践与国际结核病防治标准(ISTC)相符的私人执业医生比例。我们通过计算比值比和95%置信区间,研究了RNTCP培训与遵守ISTC之间的关联。
在3391名从事对抗疗法医学的私人执业医生中,有249人接受了访谈。其中,55%曾接触过RNTCP。对于新的肺结核患者,63%(158/249)的医生回答与ISTC诊断实践相符,34%(84/249)的回答与ISTC治疗实践相符。然而,48%(120/249)的私人执业医生还报告使用血清学检测进行结核病诊断。在新的结核病病例中,38%(94/249)的私人执业医生报告在治疗方案中使用了至少一种二线抗结核药物。RNTCP培训与诊断或治疗实践无关。
在印度浦那,尽管RNTCP进行了十年的培训活动,但仍有很大比例的医生在新结核病患者的诊断中采用结核病血清学检测,并使用二线抗结核药物。实现普遍获得高质量结核病管理的努力必须考虑到私人执业医生提供的低质量医疗服务以及当前培训努力缺乏明显效果的情况。