Suppr超能文献

国家药物相关问题数据库:实践中的应用评估、可靠性和可再现性。

A national drug related problems database: evaluation of use in practice, reliability and reproducibility.

机构信息

The Danish Research Unit for Hospital Pharmacy, Amgros I/S, Dampfærgevej 22, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark,

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Aug;36(4):742-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9957-2. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A drug related problems database (DRP-database) was developed on request by clinical pharmacists. The information from the DRP-database has only been used locally e.g. to identify focus areas and to communicate identified DRPs to the hospital wards. Hence the quality of the data at the national level is unknown, which may compromise national analyses for benchmarking and identification of national focus areas.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the use in practice, reliability and reproducibility of the DRPs documented in the Danish drug related problems database.

SETTING

Danish hospital pharmacies.

METHODS

Practice use of the DRP-database was explored by an electronic questionnaire distributed to hospital pharmacies, and consisted of questions regarding current and previous use of the DRP-database. The reliability was evaluated by comparing the categorization of 24 cases by clinical pharmacists with categorization performed by the project group. Reproducibility was explored by re-categorization of a sample of existing records in the DRP-database by two project group members individually.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Observed proportion of agreement and Fleiss' kappa as measures of inter-rater reliability and reproducibility.

RESULTS

The practice use study of 12 hospital pharmacy locations revealed that when implementing the DRP-database, the majority of identified DRPs are documented in the DRP-database, however, some variations throughout the country exist. The interrater reliability study of 34 clinical pharmacists showed high inter-rater reliability with the project group (Fleiss' kappa = 0.79 with 95 % CI (0.70; 0.88)), and the reproducibility study also documented high inter-rater reliability of a sample of 379 records from the DRP-database re-categorized by two project group members (Fleiss' kappa = 0.81 with 95 % CI (0.78; 0.85)).

CONCLUSION

The study showed high reliability and reproducibility of the DRP-database, however, some local variation in the use of the DRP-database throughout the country existed affecting the overall quality. These findings indicate that data in the DRP-database may be pooled, and national analyses may be conducted to explore development areas for common interest.

摘要

背景

应临床药师的要求开发了一个药物相关问题数据库(DRP 数据库)。该数据库的信息仅在当地使用,例如,用于确定重点领域并将已识别的 DRP 传达给医院病房。因此,国家级别的数据质量是未知的,这可能会影响国家基准分析和确定国家重点领域。

目的

本研究旨在评估丹麦药物相关问题数据库中记录的 DRP 的实际应用、可靠性和可重复性。

设置

丹麦医院药房。

方法

通过向医院药房分发电子问卷来探索 DRP 数据库的实际应用,该问卷包含关于当前和以前使用 DRP 数据库的问题。通过比较临床药师对 24 个病例的分类和项目组的分类来评估可靠性。通过两名项目组成员分别对 DRP 数据库中的现有记录样本进行重新分类来探索可重复性。

主要观察指标

观察一致性比例和 Fleiss' kappa 作为评估组内可靠性和可重复性的指标。

结果

对 12 家医院药房的实践应用研究表明,在实施 DRP 数据库时,大多数已识别的 DRP 都记录在 DRP 数据库中,但全国各地存在一些差异。对 34 名临床药师的组内可靠性研究表明,项目组具有很高的组内可靠性(Fleiss' kappa = 0.79,95 % CI(0.70;0.88)),对 DRP 数据库中 379 个记录样本的可重复性研究也记录了两名项目组成员重新分类的高组内可靠性(Fleiss' kappa = 0.81,95 % CI(0.78;0.85))。

结论

本研究表明 DRP 数据库具有很高的可靠性和可重复性,但全国各地在使用 DRP 数据库方面存在一些差异,影响了整体质量。这些发现表明,DRP 数据库中的数据可以进行汇总,并且可以进行国家分析,以探索共同感兴趣的发展领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验