Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症患者日常功能的自我报告与基于表现的测量方法比较:对测量方法选择的启示

Comparison of self-report and performance-based measures of everyday functioning in individuals with schizophrenia: implications for measure selection.

作者信息

Elliott Colette Seter, Fiszdon Joanna M

机构信息

a VA Connecticut Healthcare System , Psychology Service (116B), 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven , CT 06516 , USA.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2014;19(6):485-94. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2014.922062. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Both self-report and performance-based measures are often used in assessment of everyday functioning for individuals with schizophrenia. However, there is little evidence of overlap between them, and there are no established standards for which measures might be most appropriate. In order to better understand differences among these types of measures, we examined relationships between a self-report and two performance-based measures of everyday functioning. We also examined their patterns of interrelationships to neurocognition and psychiatric symptoms.

METHODS

Participants were 71 outpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Measures of everyday functioning (Independent Living Skill Survey-Self Report (ILSS-SR); University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment; and Medication Management Ability Assessment), cognition and psychiatric symptoms were administered. Correlation analyses were conducted to examine the relationships among the functioning measures, and their relationships to cognition and symptoms. Regression analyses further examined the unique contributions of neurocognitive and symptom variables to functional measures.

RESULTS

Consistent with the literature, the two performance-based measures were related to each other, but not to the self-report measure. Whereas the performance-based measures were related to neurocognition but not to the psychiatric symptoms, the opposite pattern was observed for the self-report measure.

CONCLUSIONS

The pattern of interrelationships among these self-report and performance-based measures suggests that they tap different aspects of everyday functioning. This has important implications for measure selection, particularly for evaluating intervention outcomes. When targeting symptoms, a self-report measure like the ILSS-SR may be more appropriate, whereas a performance-based measure may be more sensitive to functional changes subsequent to treatments targeting cognition.

摘要

引言

自我报告和基于表现的测量方法常用于评估精神分裂症患者的日常功能。然而,几乎没有证据表明它们之间存在重叠,也没有确定哪种测量方法可能最合适的既定标准。为了更好地理解这些类型测量方法之间的差异,我们研究了一种自我报告与两种基于表现的日常功能测量方法之间的关系。我们还研究了它们与神经认知和精神症状的相互关系模式。

方法

研究对象为71名精神分裂症谱系障碍门诊患者。采用了日常功能测量方法(独立生活技能调查 - 自我报告(ILSS - SR);加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校基于表现的技能评估;以及药物管理能力评估)、认知和精神症状测量方法。进行相关分析以检验功能测量方法之间的关系,以及它们与认知和症状的关系。回归分析进一步检验了神经认知和症状变量对功能测量方法的独特贡献。

结果

与文献一致,两种基于表现的测量方法相互关联,但与自我报告测量方法无关。基于表现的测量方法与神经认知相关,但与精神症状无关,而自我报告测量方法则呈现相反的模式。

结论

这些自我报告和基于表现的测量方法之间的相互关系模式表明,它们反映了日常功能不同的方面。这对测量方法的选择具有重要意义,特别是在评估干预结果时。当针对症状时,像ILSS - SR这样的自我报告测量方法可能更合适,而基于表现的测量方法可能对针对认知的治疗后的功能变化更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验