Christensen Alan C
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Genome Biol Evol. 2014 Jun 5;6(6):1448-53. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu115.
Plant mitochondrial genomes have very low mutation rates. In contrast, they also rearrange and expand frequently. This is easily understood if DNA repair in genes is accomplished by accurate mechanisms, whereas less accurate mechanisms including nonhomologous end joining or break-induced replication are used in nongenes. An important question is how different mechanisms of repair predominate in coding and noncoding DNA, although one possible mechanism is transcription-coupled repair (TCR). This work tests the predictions of TCR and finds no support for it. Examination of the mutation spectra and rates in genes and junk reveals what DNA repair mechanisms are available to plant mitochondria, and what selective forces act on the repair products. A model is proposed that mismatches and other DNA damages are repaired by converting them into double-strand breaks (DSBs). These can then be repaired by any of the DSB repair mechanisms, both accurate and inaccurate. Natural selection will eliminate coding regions repaired by inaccurate mechanisms, accounting for the low mutation rates in genes, whereas mutations, rearrangements, and expansions generated by inaccurate repair in noncoding regions will persist. Support for this model includes the structure of the mitochondrial mutS homolog in plants, which is fused to a double-strand endonuclease. The model proposes that plant mitochondria do not distinguish a damaged or mismatched DNA strand from the undamaged strand, they simply cut both strands and perform homology-based DSB repair. This plant-specific strategy for protecting future generations from mitochondrial DNA damage has the side effect of genome expansions and rearrangements.
植物线粒体基因组的突变率非常低。相比之下,它们也经常发生重排和扩增。如果基因中的DNA修复是通过精确机制完成的,而非基因区域使用包括非同源末端连接或断裂诱导复制等不太精确的机制,那么这一点就很容易理解了。一个重要的问题是,不同的修复机制如何在编码和非编码DNA中占主导地位,尽管一种可能的机制是转录偶联修复(TCR)。这项研究检验了TCR的预测结果,但未找到支持证据。对基因和垃圾DNA中的突变谱和突变率进行检查,揭示了植物线粒体可利用哪些DNA修复机制,以及哪些选择力作用于修复产物。本文提出了一个模型,即错配和其他DNA损伤通过将其转化为双链断裂(DSB)来修复。然后,这些双链断裂可以通过任何一种DSB修复机制进行修复,包括精确和不精确的机制。自然选择将淘汰通过不精确机制修复的编码区域,这就解释了基因中低突变率的原因,而在非编码区域由不精确修复产生的突变、重排和扩增将持续存在。对该模型的支持包括植物中线粒体mutS同源物的结构,它与一种双链内切核酸酶融合。该模型提出,植物线粒体不会区分受损或错配的DNA链与未受损链,它们只是切割两条链并进行基于同源性的DSB修复。这种植物特有的保护后代免受线粒体DNA损伤的策略会产生基因组扩增和重排的副作用。