Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Einstein Healthcare Network Elkins Park, PA, USA ; Department of Neurology and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Neurology and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Front Psychol. 2014 May 26;5:494. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00494. eCollection 2014.
Neuroimaging studies have found that sensorimotor systems are engaged when participants observe actions or comprehend action language. However, most of these studies have asked the binary question of whether action concepts are embodied or not, rather than whether sensory and motor areas of the brain contain graded amounts of information during putative action simulations. To address this question, we used repetition suppression (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine if functionally-localized motor movement and visual motion regions-of-interest (ROI) and two anatomical ROIs (inferior frontal gyrus, IFG; left posterior middle temporal gyrus, pMTG) were sensitive to changes in the exemplar (e.g., two different people "kicking") or representational format (e.g., photograph or schematic drawing of someone "kicking") within pairs of action images. We also investigated whether concrete versus more symbolic depictions of actions (i.e., photographs or schematic drawings) yielded different patterns of activation throughout the brain. We found that during a conceptual task, sensory and motor systems represent actions at different levels of specificity. While the visual motion ROI did not exhibit RS to different exemplars of the same action or to the same action depicted by different formats, the motor movement ROI did. These effects are consistent with "person-specific" action simulations: if the motor system is recruited for action understanding, it does so by activating one's own motor program for an action. We also observed significant repetition enhancement within the IFG ROI to different exemplars or formats of the same action, a result that may indicate additional cognitive processing on these trials. Finally, we found that the recruitment of posterior brain regions by action concepts depends on the format of the input: left lateral occipital cortex and right supramarginal gyrus responded more strongly to symbolic depictions of actions than concrete ones.
神经影像学研究发现,当参与者观察动作或理解动作语言时,感觉运动系统会被激活。然而,这些研究大多询问了一个二元问题,即动作概念是否具有身体性,而不是大脑中的感觉和运动区域在假设的动作模拟过程中是否包含分级信息。为了解决这个问题,我们使用重复抑制(RS)功能磁共振成像来确定功能上定位的运动和视觉运动区域-感兴趣区(ROI)以及两个解剖学 ROI(额下回,IFG;左后颞中回,pMTG)是否对范例(例如,两个人“踢”)或表示格式(例如,某人“踢”的照片或示意图)的变化敏感。我们还研究了动作的具体表示与更具符号性的表示(即照片或示意图)是否在整个大脑中产生不同的激活模式。我们发现,在概念任务中,感觉和运动系统以不同的特异性水平表示动作。虽然视觉运动 ROI 对同一动作的不同范例或不同格式表示的同一动作没有表现出 RS,但运动运动 ROI 则有。这些效应与“特定于人的”动作模拟一致:如果运动系统被招募用于动作理解,它会通过激活自己的动作程序来实现。我们还观察到 IFG ROI 内对同一动作的不同范例或格式的重复增强,这一结果可能表明这些试验中存在额外的认知处理。最后,我们发现,动作概念对大脑后部区域的招募取决于输入的格式:左侧外侧枕叶皮层和右侧缘上回对动作的符号表示比对具体表示的反应更强烈。