Suppr超能文献

具身词汇语义表示的灵活性。

Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations.

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Oct;33(10):2322-33. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21365. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

Abstract

According to an embodied view of language comprehension, language concepts are grounded in our perceptual systems. Evidence for the idea that concepts are grounded in areas involved in action and perception comes from both behavioral and neuroimaging studies (Glenberg [1997]: Behav Brain Sci 20:1-55; Barsalou [1999]: Behav Brain Sci 22:577-660; Pulvermueller [1999]: Behav Brain Sci 22:253-336; Barsalou et al. [2003]: Trends Cogn Sci 7:84-91). However, the results from several studies indicate that the activation of information in perception and action areas is not a purely automatic process (Raposo et al. [2009]: Neuropsychologia 47:388-396; Rueschemeyer et al. [2007]: J Cogn Neurosci 19:855-865). These findings suggest that embodied representations are flexible. In these studies, flexibility is characterized by the relative presence or absence of activation in our perceptual systems. However, even if the context in which a word is presented does not undermine a motor interpretation, it is possible that the degree to which a modality-specific region contributes to a representation depends on the context in which conceptual features are retrieved. In the present study, we investigated this issue by presenting word stimuli for which both motor and visual properties (e.g., Tennis ball, Boxing glove) were important in constituting the concept. Conform with the idea that language representations are flexible and context dependent, we demonstrate that the degree to which a modality-specific region contributes to a representation considerably changes as a function of context.

摘要

根据语言理解的体现观点,语言概念是基于我们的感知系统的。概念基于涉及行动和感知的区域的观点的证据来自行为和神经影像学研究(Glenberg [1997]:Behav Brain Sci 20:1-55;Barsalou [1999]:Behav Brain Sci 22:577-660;Pulvermueller [1999]:Behav Brain Sci 22:253-336;Barsalou 等人,2003:Trends Cogn Sci 7:84-91)。然而,几项研究的结果表明,感知和行动区域的信息激活不是一个纯粹的自动过程(Raposo 等人,2009:Neuropsychologia 47:388-396;Rueschemeyer 等人,2007:J Cogn Neurosci 19:855-865)。这些发现表明,体现的表示是灵活的。在这些研究中,灵活性的特点是我们的感知系统中激活的相对存在或不存在。然而,即使呈现单词的上下文不会破坏运动解释,也有可能模态特定区域对表示的贡献程度取决于概念特征检索的上下文。在本研究中,我们通过呈现对构成概念很重要的运动和视觉属性(例如,网球,拳击手套)的单词刺激来研究这个问题。与语言表示是灵活和上下文相关的观点一致,我们证明了模态特定区域对表示的贡献程度随着上下文的变化而显著变化。

相似文献

1
Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations.具身词汇语义表示的灵活性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Oct;33(10):2322-33. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21365. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
9
The missing link in the embodiment of syntax: prosody.句法体现中的缺失环节:韵律。
Brain Lang. 2014 Oct;137:91-102. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring semantic grounding in the posterior parietal cortex.探索后顶叶皮质中的语义基础。
Brain Struct Funct. 2025 Jun 26;230(6):106. doi: 10.1007/s00429-025-02970-0.
7
How does the "default mode" network contribute to semantic cognition?“默认模式”网络如何促进语义认知?
Brain Lang. 2024 May;252:105405. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105405. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Context effects in embodied lexical-semantic processing.具身词汇语义加工中的语境效应。
Front Psychol. 2010 Oct 4;1:150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00150. eCollection 2010.
2
Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics.成年期:具身认知与语义神经科学述评
Cortex. 2012 Jul;48(7):788-804. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
9
Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension.句子理解中感觉运动区的激活。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Feb;20(2):468-78. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp115. Epub 2009 Jun 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验