• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How much does mental health discrimination cost: valuing experienced discrimination in relation to healthcare care costs and community participation.心理健康歧视造成了多大的代价:评估与医疗保健成本和社区参与相关的经历歧视的价值。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Oct;24(5):423-34. doi: 10.1017/S2045796014000377. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
2
The economic costs of mental health-related discrimination.与心理健康相关的歧视所带来的经济成本。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Aug;134 Suppl 446(Suppl Suppl 446):34-44. doi: 10.1111/acps.12608.
3
Mental health-related discrimination as a predictor of low engagement with mental health services.与心理健康相关的歧视作为心理健康服务参与度低的预测因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Feb 1;66(2):171-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300448. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
4
Discrimination in relation to parenthood reported by community psychiatric service users in the UK: a framework analysis.英国社区精神科服务使用者报告的与为人父母相关的歧视:一项框架分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Apr 20;13:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-120.
5
Measuring the economic costs of discrimination experienced by people with mental health problems: development of the Costs of Discrimination Assessment (CODA).衡量心理健康问题患者所遭受歧视的经济成本:歧视成本评估(CODA)的制定。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 May;50(5):787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0968-z. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
6
[Discrimination perceived by people with a diagnosis of schizophrenic disorders. INternational study of DIscrimination and stiGma Outcomes (INDIGO): French results].[精神分裂症谱系障碍患者所感受到的歧视。歧视与耻辱结局国际研究(INDIGO):法国的研究结果]
Encephale. 2012 Jun;38(3):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
7
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
8
Psychiatric diagnosis and other predictors of experienced and anticipated workplace discrimination and concealment of mental illness among mental health service users in England.精神卫生服务使用者在英格兰经历和预期的工作场所歧视和精神疾病隐瞒与精神科诊断及其他预测因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;53(10):1099-1109. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1561-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Coping with stigma and discrimination: evidence from mental health service users in England.应对污名化和歧视:来自英格兰心理健康服务使用者的证据。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):577-588. doi: 10.1017/S204579601700021X. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
Perspectives of healthcare providers, service users, and family members about mental illness stigma in primary care settings: A multi-site qualitative study of seven countries in Africa, Asia, and Europe.在初级保健环境中心理疾病污名化的医护人员、服务使用者和家属观点:一项在非洲、亚洲和欧洲七个国家的多地点定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 27;16(10):e0258729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258729. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Perceived Discrimination in Healthcare Among United States Middle-aged and Older Adults.美国中老年成年人在医疗保健中感知到的歧视相关因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Aug 5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09796-w.
2
Care management staff perspectives on stigma and barriers to substance use treatment experienced by latine adults who use substances.护理管理人员对使用药物的拉丁裔成年人在药物使用治疗中所经历的耻辱感和障碍的看法。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2025 May 10;15:100342. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100342. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Factors Associated with Perceived Discrimination in Healthcare Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults.与中老年人群在医疗保健中感知到的歧视相关的因素。
Res Sq. 2025 May 2:rs.3.rs-6507515. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507515/v1.
4
Typologies of mental healthcare discrimination experiences and associations with current provider care ratings: A latent class analysis.心理保健歧视经历的类型及其与当前提供者护理评级的关联:一项潜在类别分析。
SSM Ment Health. 2022 Dec;2. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100105. Epub 2022 May 4.
5
Workplace-Based Organizational Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Happiness among Healthcare Workers: A Realist Review.基于工作场所的组织干预措施促进医护人员的心理健康和幸福感:一项现实主义综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;16(22):4396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224396.
6
Discriminative nursing care: A grounded theory study.差异化护理:一项扎根理论研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jul;8(7):2289-2293. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_341_19.
7
Does mental health-related discrimination predict health service use 2 years later? Findings from an Australian national survey.心理健康相关歧视是否会预测 2 年后的卫生服务利用情况?来自澳大利亚全国性调查的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;55(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01762-2. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Associations of Perceived Discrimination With Impaired Functioning in a Population Sample With Psychological Distress.在有心理困扰的人群样本中,感知到的歧视与功能受损之间的关联。
Psychiatry. 2018 Summer;81(2):130-140. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2017.1354622. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
9
The economic costs of mental health-related discrimination.与心理健康相关的歧视所带来的经济成本。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Aug;134 Suppl 446(Suppl Suppl 446):34-44. doi: 10.1111/acps.12608.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the economic costs of discrimination experienced by people with mental health problems: development of the Costs of Discrimination Assessment (CODA).衡量心理健康问题患者所遭受歧视的经济成本:歧视成本评估(CODA)的制定。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 May;50(5):787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0968-z. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
2
Anticipated and experienced discrimination amongst people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a cross sectional study.精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症患者中预期的和经历过的歧视:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 May 29;14:157. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-157.
3
Attitudes of the German public to restrictions on persons with mental illness in 1993 and 2011.1993年和2011年德国公众对精神疾病患者限制措施的态度。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014 Sep;23(3):263-70. doi: 10.1017/S2045796014000183. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
4
What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.与心理健康相关的污名对寻求帮助有何影响?对定量和定性研究的系统评价。
Psychol Med. 2015 Jan;45(1):11-27. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000129. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
5
Discrimination against people with severe mental illness and their access to social capital: findings from the Viewpoint survey.对严重精神疾病患者的歧视及其社会资本获取情况:观点调查结果
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014 Jun;23(2):155-65. doi: 10.1017/S2045796013000243. Epub 2013 May 20.
6
Discrimination in relation to parenthood reported by community psychiatric service users in the UK: a framework analysis.英国社区精神科服务使用者报告的与为人父母相关的歧视:一项框架分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Apr 20;13:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-120.
7
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Discrimination and Stigma Scale (DISC).歧视与污名量表(DISC)的编制与心理测量学评估。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Jun 30;208(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
8
Economic evaluation of the anti-stigma social marketing campaign in England 2009-2011.2009 - 2011年英国反耻辱感社会营销活动的经济评估
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2013 Apr;55:s95-101. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.113746.
9
Anti-stigma training for medical students: the Education Not Discrimination project.医学生反污名化培训:“教育而非歧视”项目
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2013 Apr;55:s89-94. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.114017.
10
Experiences of discrimination among people using mental health services in England 2008-2011.2008 - 2011年英格兰使用心理健康服务人群的歧视经历。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2013 Apr;55:s58-63. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.112912.

心理健康歧视造成了多大的代价:评估与医疗保健成本和社区参与相关的经历歧视的价值。

How much does mental health discrimination cost: valuing experienced discrimination in relation to healthcare care costs and community participation.

作者信息

Evans-Lacko S, Clement S, Corker E, Brohan E, Dockery L, Farrelly S, Hamilton S, Pinfold V, Rose D, Henderson C, Thornicroft G, McCrone P

机构信息

Health Service and Population Research Department,Institute of Psychiatry,King's College London,De Crespigny Park,London E5 8AF,UK.

出版信息

Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Oct;24(5):423-34. doi: 10.1017/S2045796014000377. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1017/S2045796014000377
PMID:24905844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8367353/
Abstract

AIMS

This study builds on existing research on the prevalence and consequences of mental illness discrimination by investigating and quantifying the relationships between experienced discrimination and costs of healthcare and leisure activities/social participation among secondary mental health service users in England.

METHODS

We use data from the Mental Illness-Related Investigations on Discrimination (MIRIAD) study (n = 202) and a subsample of the Viewpoint study (n = 190). We examine experiences of discrimination due to mental illness in the domains of personal relationships, community activities, and health care, and how such experienced discrimination relates to patterns of service use and engagement in leisure activities.

RESULTS

Our findings show that the cost of health services used for individuals who reported previous experiences of discrimination in a healthcare setting was almost twice as high as for those who did not report any discrimination during the last 12 months (Relative Risk: 1.73; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.39, 2.17) and this was maintained after controlling for symptoms and functioning. Experienced discrimination in healthcare (Relative Risk: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.81, 0.84) or in relationships (Relative Risk: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.87, 0.91), however, was associated with lower participation in, and hence lower costs of, leisure activities. Individuals who reported any discrimination in a healthcare setting had, on average, £434 higher costs associated with health service use while reported discrimination in the community was associated with increased leisure costs of £32.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings make an important initial step towards understanding the magnitude of the costs of mental health-related discrimination.

摘要

目的

本研究基于现有的关于精神疾病歧视的患病率及后果的研究,通过调查和量化英格兰二级心理健康服务使用者所经历的歧视与医疗保健及休闲活动/社会参与成本之间的关系来展开。

方法

我们使用了来自精神疾病相关歧视调查(MIRIAD)研究(n = 202)和观点研究的一个子样本(n = 190)的数据。我们考察在人际关系、社区活动和医疗保健领域因精神疾病而遭受歧视的经历,以及这种经历的歧视如何与服务使用模式和休闲活动参与情况相关。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,在医疗保健环境中报告有过歧视经历的个人所使用的医疗服务成本,几乎是在过去12个月中未报告任何歧视的个人的两倍(相对风险:1.73;95%置信区间(CI):1.39,2.17),并且在控制了症状和功能后这一情况依然存在。然而,在医疗保健(相对风险:0.83;95% CI:0.81,0.84)或人际关系(相对风险:0.89;95% CI:0.87,0.91)方面经历的歧视,与较低的休闲活动参与度相关,进而与较低的休闲活动成本相关。在医疗保健环境中报告有任何歧视的个人,与医疗服务使用相关的成本平均高出434英镑,而在社区中报告的歧视与休闲成本增加32英镑相关。

结论

这些发现朝着理解与心理健康相关的歧视成本规模迈出了重要的第一步。