Kiefer David, Tellez-Girón Patricia, Bradbury E Jane
WMJ. 2014 Apr;113(2):64-71.
Herbal medicine use is common in the United States, especially in immigrant populations. Understanding of this plant use is incomplete, with significant gaps in the literature for people living in the Midwest, about the plant species used, and about how home herbal medicine use interacts with allopathic medicine.
This pilot project used a qualitative research approach (interviews and focus groups, convenience sampling) to explore this topic for Latin America immigrants living in Madison, Wisconsin.
Eight interviews and focus groups consisting of 42 people yielded 199 minutes of audio recordings and the mention of 57 medicinal plants. These plants were obtained from gardens, relatives and friends (abroad and local), mail order, and local retail establishments. Retail sites sold fresh plants, dried plants, spices, foods, and packaged products, ranging from 20 to over 150 plant products per site. A preponderance of plants, especially in Latino-focused stores, was food that also served a medicinal purpose. Participants mentioned 35 distinct health and disease categories for which herbal medicines were used, and sometimes, but not always, discussed plant use with their health care provider. When compared with likely Latin binomial taxonomic names, clinically relevant confusions with the use of common plant names also were identified.
Overall, the findings presented illustrate the complexities surrounding herbal medicine use and create a case for future work to involve other demographics, and focus on botanical identification, the quantification of disclosure rates, and the development of educational interventions for physicians and patients.
草药在美国使用普遍,尤其是在移民群体中。人们对草药使用的了解并不全面,关于美国中西部居民使用的植物种类,以及家庭草药使用与对抗疗法如何相互作用,相关文献存在重大空白。
本试点项目采用定性研究方法(访谈和焦点小组,便利抽样),针对居住在威斯康星州麦迪逊市的拉丁美洲移民探索该主题。
8次访谈和焦点小组,共42人,产生了199分钟的录音,并提及了57种药用植物。这些植物来自花园、亲戚和朋友(国内外)、邮购以及当地零售机构。零售场所出售新鲜植物、干植物、香料、食品和包装产品,每个场所的植物产品从20种到150多种不等。大量植物,尤其是在以拉丁裔为重点的商店中,是兼具药用目的的食物。参与者提到了35种使用草药的不同健康和疾病类别,并且有时(但并非总是)会与他们的医疗服务提供者讨论植物的使用情况。与可能的拉丁双名分类学名称相比,还发现了使用常见植物名称时在临床上相关的混淆情况。
总体而言,所呈现的研究结果说明了围绕草药使用的复杂性,并为未来的工作提供了依据,即纳入其他人群,并专注于植物鉴定、披露率的量化以及为医生和患者制定教育干预措施。