1MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health,Imperial College London,London,United Kingdom.
3Department of Neurosurgery/Emergency Medicine and Critical Care,Tohoku University Hospital,Miyagi,Japan.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014 Jun;29(3):245-53. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14000521. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
In catastrophic events, a key to reducing health risks is to maintain functioning of local health facilities. However, little research has been conducted on what types and levels of care are the most likely to be affected by catastrophic events. Problem The Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster (GEJED) was one of a few "mega disasters" that have occurred in an industrialized society. This research aimed to develop an analytical framework for the holistic understanding of hospital damage due to the disaster.
Hospital damage data in Miyagi Prefecture at the time of the GEJED were collected retrospectively. Due to the low response rate of questionnaire-based surveillance (7.7%), publications of the national and local governments, medical associations, other nonprofit organizations, and home web pages of hospitals were used, as well as literature and news sources. The data included information on building damage, electricity and water supply, and functional status after the earthquake. Geographical data for hospitals, coastline, local boundaries, and the in undated areas, as well as population size and seismic intensity were collected from public databases. Logistic regression was conducted to identify the risk factors for hospitals ceasing inpatient and outpatient services. The impact was displayed on maps to show the geographical distribution of damage.
Data for 143 out of 147 hospitals in Miyagi Prefecture (97%) were obtained. Building damage was significantly associated with closure of both inpatient and outpatient wards. Hospitals offering tertiary care were more resistant to damage than those offering primary care, while those with a higher proportion of psychiatric care beds were more likely to cease functioning, even after controlling for hospital size, seismic intensity, and distance from the coastline.
Implementation of building regulations is vital for all health care facilities, irrespective of function. Additionally, securing electricity and water supplies is vital for hospitals at risk for similar events in the future. Improved data sharing on hospital viability in a future event is essential for disaster preparedness.
在灾难性事件中,降低健康风险的关键是维持当地卫生设施的运转。然而,对于哪些类型和级别的医疗服务最有可能受到灾难性事件的影响,研究甚少。
东日本大地震(GEJED)是工业化社会中发生的几次“特大灾害”之一。本研究旨在开发一个分析框架,以全面了解灾害对医院造成的破坏。
回顾性收集了 GEJED 期间宫城县的医院受损数据。由于基于问卷调查的监测响应率较低(7.7%),因此还利用了政府、医学协会、其他非营利组织和医院的主页、文献和新闻来源等渠道收集数据。这些数据包括地震后的建筑损坏、电力和供水以及功能状态等信息。从公共数据库中收集了医院、海岸线、地方边界和未受影响地区的地理位置数据,以及人口规模和地震强度数据。使用逻辑回归识别了导致医院停止门诊和住院服务的风险因素。将影响显示在地图上,以显示受损的地理分布。
获得了宫城县 147 家医院中的 143 家(97%)的数据。建筑损坏与住院和门诊病房关闭均显著相关。提供三级护理的医院比提供初级护理的医院更能抵御损坏,而提供更多精神科病床的医院即使在控制医院规模、地震强度和距海岸线距离后,也更有可能停止运作。
无论功能如何,所有医疗保健设施都必须执行建筑法规。此外,为了确保未来类似事件中医院的电力和供水,这一点至关重要。在未来的事件中,提高有关医院生存能力的数据共享对于灾难准备至关重要。