Suppr超能文献

关于成果项目。

On the Outcome Project.

作者信息

Manthous Constantine A

机构信息

Lawrence and Memorial Hospital, New London, Connecticut.

出版信息

Yale J Biol Med. 2014 Jun 6;87(2):213-20. eCollection 2014 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2001, graduate medical education in the United States was renovated to better complement 21st century developments in American medicine, society, and culture. As in 1910, when Abraham Flexner was charged to address a relatively non-standardized system that lacked accountability and threatened credibility of the profession, Dr. David Leach led the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Outcome Project in a process that has substantially changed medical pedagogy in the United States.

METHODS

Brief review of the Flexner Report of 1910 and 6 hours of interviews with leaders of the Outcome Project (4 hours with Dr. David Leach and 1-hour interviews with Drs. Paul Batalden and Susan Swing).

RESULTS

Medical educational leaders and the ACGME concluded in the late 1990s that medical education was not preparing clinicians sufficiently for lifelong learning in the 21st century. A confluence of medical, social, and historic factors required definitions and a common vocabulary for teaching and evaluating medical competency. After a deliberate consensus-driven process, the ACGME and its leaders produced a system requiring greater accountability of learners and teachers, in six explicitly defined domains of medical "competence." While imperfect, this construct has started to take hold, creating a common vocabulary for longitudinal learning, from undergraduate to post-graduate (residency) education and in the assessment of performance following graduate training.

摘要

背景

2001年,美国研究生医学教育进行了改革,以更好地适应21世纪美国医学、社会和文化的发展。就像1910年亚伯拉罕·弗莱克斯纳受命应对一个相对不规范、缺乏问责制且威胁到该行业信誉的体系一样,大卫·利奇博士领导了研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的成果项目,这一过程极大地改变了美国的医学教学法。

方法

简要回顾1910年的《弗莱克斯纳报告》,并对成果项目的负责人进行6小时访谈(与大卫·利奇博士进行4小时访谈,与保罗·巴塔尔登博士和苏珊·斯温博士分别进行1小时访谈)。

结果

医学教育领导者和ACGME在20世纪90年代末得出结论,医学教育没有让临床医生为21世纪的终身学习做好充分准备。医学、社会和历史因素的共同作用要求为教学和评估医学能力制定定义和通用词汇。经过一个经过深思熟虑的、由共识驱动的过程,ACGME及其领导者制定了一个系统,要求学习者和教师在六个明确界定的医学“能力”领域承担更大的责任。虽然并不完美,但这个架构已开始扎根,为从本科到研究生(住院医师)教育的纵向学习以及研究生培训后的绩效评估创造了通用词汇。

相似文献

1
On the Outcome Project.关于成果项目。
Yale J Biol Med. 2014 Jun 6;87(2):213-20. eCollection 2014 Jun.
10
The Next Accreditation System in ophthalmology.眼科学的下一个认证系统。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):82-5. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

本文引用的文献

4
Developmental evaluation: building innovations in complex environments.发展性评估:在复杂环境中构建创新
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Sep;12(5):645-50. doi: 10.1177/1524839911412596. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
8

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验