Williams Robert K, Black Ian H, Howard Diantha B, Adams David C, Mathews Donald M, Friend Alexander F, Meyers H W Bud
From the Department of Anesthesiology, Vermont Children's Hospital; †Department of Anesthesiology, Fletcher Allen Health Care; ‡Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Vermont; and §James M. Jeffords Center for Policy Research, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Anesth Analg. 2014 Sep;119(3):651-660. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000288.
Observational studies on pediatric anesthesia neurotoxicity have been unable to distinguish long-term effects of general anesthesia (GA) from factors associated with the need for surgery. A recent study on elementary school children who had received a single GA during the first year of life demonstrated an association in otherwise healthy children between the duration of anesthesia and diminished test scores and also revealed a subgroup of children with "very poor academic achievement" (VPAA), scoring below the fifth percentile on standardized testing. Analysis of postoperative cognitive function in a similar cohort of children anesthetized with an alternative to GA may help to begin to separate the effects of anesthesia from other confounders.
We used a novel methodology to construct a combined medical and educational database to search for these effects in a similar cohort of children receiving spinal anesthesia (SA) for the same procedures. We compared former patients with a control population of students matched by grade, gender, year of testing, and socioeconomic status.
Vermont Department of Education records were analyzed for 265 students who had a single exposure to SA during infancy for circumcision, pyloromyotomy, or inguinal hernia repair. Exposure to SA and surgery had no significant effect on the odds of children having VPAA. (mathematics: P = 0.18; odds ratio 1.50, confidence interval (CI), 0.83-2.68; reading: P = 0.55; odds ratio = 1.19, CI, 0.67-2.1). There was no relationship between duration of exposure to SA and surgery and performance on mathematics (P = 0.73) or reading (P = 0.57) standardized testing. There was a small but statistically significant decrease in reading and math scores in the exposed group (mathematics: P = 0.03; reading: P = 0.02).
We found no link between duration of surgery with infant SA and scores on academic achievement testing in elementary school. We also found no relationship between infant SA and surgery with VPAA on elementary school testing, although the CIs were wide.
关于儿科麻醉神经毒性的观察性研究无法区分全身麻醉(GA)的长期影响与手术需求相关因素。最近一项针对在一岁时接受过单次全身麻醉的小学生的研究表明,在其他方面健康的儿童中,麻醉持续时间与测试分数降低之间存在关联,并且还发现了一个“学业成绩非常差”(VPAA)的儿童亚组,其在标准化测试中的得分低于第五百分位。对使用全身麻醉替代方法进行麻醉的类似儿童队列的术后认知功能分析,可能有助于开始将麻醉的影响与其他混杂因素区分开来。
我们使用一种新颖的方法构建了一个综合医疗和教育数据库,以在接受相同手术的脊髓麻醉(SA)的类似儿童队列中寻找这些影响。我们将以前的患者与按年级、性别、测试年份和社会经济地位匹配的学生对照人群进行了比较。
对佛蒙特州教育部记录的265名在婴儿期因包皮环切术、幽门肌切开术或腹股沟疝修补术而单次接受脊髓麻醉的学生进行了分析。暴露于脊髓麻醉和手术对儿童出现学业成绩非常差的几率没有显著影响。(数学:P = 0.18;优势比1.50,置信区间(CI),0.83 - 2.68;阅读:P = 0.55;优势比 = 1.19,CI,0.67 - 2.1)。暴露于脊髓麻醉和手术的持续时间与数学(P = 0.73)或阅读(P = 0.57)标准化测试成绩之间没有关系。暴露组的阅读和数学成绩有小幅但具有统计学意义的下降(数学:P = 0.03;阅读:P = 0.02)。
我们发现婴儿脊髓麻醉的手术持续时间与小学学业成绩测试分数之间没有关联。我们还发现婴儿脊髓麻醉和手术与小学测试中的学业成绩非常差之间没有关系,尽管置信区间较宽。