• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用计算工具时的多数投票及其他问题。

Majority vote and other problems when using computational tools.

作者信息

Vihinen Mauno

机构信息

Department of Experimental Medical Science, BMC D10, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Hum Mutat. 2014 Aug;35(8):912-4. doi: 10.1002/humu.22600. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1002/humu.22600
PMID:24915749
Abstract

Computational tools are essential for most of our research. To use these tools, one needs to know how they work. Problems in application of computational methods to variation analysis can appear at several stages and affect, for example, the interpretation of results. Such cases are discussed along with suggestions how to avoid them. The applications include incomplete reporting of methods, especially about the use of prediction tools; method selection on unscientific grounds and without consulting independent method performance assessments; extending application area of methods outside their intended purpose; use of the same data several times for obtaining majority vote; and filtering of datasets so that variants of interest are excluded. All these issues can be avoided by discontinuing the use software tools as black boxes.

摘要

计算工具对我们的大多数研究至关重要。要使用这些工具,人们需要了解它们的工作原理。在将计算方法应用于变异分析时,问题可能出现在几个阶段,并影响例如结果的解释。本文将讨论这些情况,并提出如何避免这些情况的建议。这些应用包括方法报告不完整,特别是关于预测工具的使用;基于不科学的理由选择方法,且未参考独立的方法性能评估;将方法的应用领域扩展到其预期目的之外;多次使用相同的数据以获得多数投票;以及对数据集进行筛选,从而排除感兴趣的变异。通过不再将软件工具当作黑箱使用,所有这些问题都可以避免。

相似文献

1
Majority vote and other problems when using computational tools.使用计算工具时的多数投票及其他问题。
Hum Mutat. 2014 Aug;35(8):912-4. doi: 10.1002/humu.22600. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
2
Problems in variation interpretation guidelines and in their implementation in computational tools.变异解读指南及其在计算工具中的实施存在的问题。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1206. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1206. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
3
Guidelines for reporting and using prediction tools for genetic variation analysis.遗传变异分析报告和预测工具使用指南。
Hum Mutat. 2013 Feb;34(2):275-82. doi: 10.1002/humu.22253. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
4
Using Grid technology for computationally intensive applied bioinformatics analyses.将网格技术应用于计算密集型的应用生物信息学分析。
In Silico Biol. 2006;6(6):495-504.
5
PON-P and PON-P2 predictor performance in CAGI challenges: Lessons learned.在CAGI挑战中PON-P和PON-P2预测器的性能:经验教训。
Hum Mutat. 2017 Sep;38(9):1085-1091. doi: 10.1002/humu.23199. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
Variation Interpretation Predictors: Principles, Types, Performance, and Choice.变异解读预测指标:原理、类型、性能及选择
Hum Mutat. 2016 Jun;37(6):579-97. doi: 10.1002/humu.22987. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
Evaluation of methods for predicting the topology of beta-barrel outer membrane proteins and a consensus prediction method.β-桶状外膜蛋白拓扑结构预测方法的评估及一种共识预测方法
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Jan 12;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-7.
8
Feature selection environment for genomic applications.用于基因组应用的特征选择环境。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Oct 22;9:451. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-451.
9
Prediction of torsade-causing potential of drugs by support vector machine approach.用支持向量机方法预测药物引发尖端扭转型室速的可能性。
Toxicol Sci. 2004 May;79(1):170-7. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfh082. Epub 2004 Feb 19.
10
Gene structure prediction by spliced alignment of genomic DNA with protein sequences: increased accuracy by differential splice site scoring.通过基因组DNA与蛋白质序列的剪接比对进行基因结构预测:通过差异剪接位点评分提高准确性。
J Mol Biol. 2000 Apr 14;297(5):1075-85. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3641.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in Clinicogenetic Correlations: One Phenotype - Many Genes.临床遗传学关联中的挑战:一种表型 - 多个基因。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2021 Mar 2;8(3):311-321. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13163. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Problems in variation interpretation guidelines and in their implementation in computational tools.变异解读指南及其在计算工具中的实施存在的问题。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1206. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1206. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
3
New insights into the pathogenicity of non-synonymous variants through multi-level analysis.
通过多层次分析深入了解非同义变异的致病性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 7;9(1):1667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38189-9.
4
Representativeness of variation benchmark datasets.变异性基准数据集的代表性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2478-6.
5
Accurate Classification of Gene Variants in 84 Italian Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.84例意大利1型神经纤维瘤病患者基因变异的准确分类
Genes (Basel). 2018 Apr 17;9(4):216. doi: 10.3390/genes9040216.
6
HUMA: A platform for the analysis of genetic variation in humans.HUMA:一个用于分析人类遗传变异的平台。
Hum Mutat. 2018 Jan;39(1):40-51. doi: 10.1002/humu.23334. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
7
Development of pathogenicity predictors specific for variants that do not comply with clinical guidelines for the use of computational evidence.针对不符合计算证据使用临床指南的变异体的致病性预测指标的开发。
BMC Genomics. 2017 Aug 11;18(Suppl 5):569. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3914-0.
8
CHARGE and Kabuki Syndromes: Gene-Specific DNA Methylation Signatures Identify Epigenetic Mechanisms Linking These Clinically Overlapping Conditions.CHARGE综合征和歌舞伎综合征:基因特异性DNA甲基化特征揭示了将这些临床重叠病症联系起来的表观遗传机制。
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 May 4;100(5):773-788. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.04.004.
9
PON-P and PON-P2 predictor performance in CAGI challenges: Lessons learned.在CAGI挑战中PON-P和PON-P2预测器的性能:经验教训。
Hum Mutat. 2017 Sep;38(9):1085-1091. doi: 10.1002/humu.23199. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
PaPI: pseudo amino acid composition to score human protein-coding variants.PaPI:用于评估人类蛋白质编码变体的伪氨基酸组成。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015 Apr 19;16:123. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0554-8.