Suppr超能文献

评价苯乙烯-二乙烯基苯珠粒作为固定化脂肪酶的载体。

Evaluation of styrene-divinylbenzene beads as a support to immobilize lipases.

机构信息

Departamento de Biocatalisis, ICP-CSIC, Campus UAM-CSIC, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain.

Escuela de Química, Grupo de investigación en Bioquímica y Microbiología (GIBIM), Edificio Camilo Torres 210, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga 680001, Colombia.

出版信息

Molecules. 2014 Jun 10;19(6):7629-45. doi: 10.3390/molecules19067629.

Abstract

A commercial and very hydrophobic styrene-divinylbenzene matrix, MCI GEL® CHP20P, has been compared to octyl-Sepharose® beads as support to immobilize three different enzymes: lipases from Thermomyces lanuginosus (TLL) and from Rhizomucor miehie (RML) and Lecitase® Ultra, a commercial artificial phospholipase. The immobilization mechanism on both supports was similar: interfacial activation of the enzymes versus the hydrophobic surface of the supports. Immobilization rate and loading capacity is much higher using MCI GEL® CHP20P compared to octyl-Sepharose® (87.2 mg protein/g of support using TLL, 310 mg/g using RML and 180 mg/g using Lecitase® Ultra). The thermal stability of all new preparations is much lower than that of the standard octyl-Sepharose® immobilized preparations, while the opposite occurs when the inactivations were performed in the presence of organic co-solvents. Regarding the hydrolytic activities, the results were strongly dependent on the substrate and pH of measurement. Octyl-Sepharose® immobilized enzymes were more active versus p-NPB than the enzymes immobilized on MCI GEL® CHP20P, while RML became 700-fold less active versus methyl phenylacetate. Thus, the immobilization of a lipase on this matrix needs to be empirically evaluated, since it may present very positive effects in some cases while in other cases it may have very negative ones.

摘要

一种商业的、疏水性很强的苯乙烯-二乙烯基苯基质 MCI GEL® CHP20P,与辛基-Sepharose®珠相比,被用作固定三种不同的酶:从Thermomyces lanuginosus(TLL)和Rhizomucor miehie(RML)中提取的脂肪酶,以及 Lecitase® Ultra,一种商业人工磷脂酶。两种载体上的固定化机制相似:酶的界面活化与载体的疏水性表面相对应。与辛基-Sepharose®相比,MCI GEL® CHP20P 的固定化速度和负载能力要高得多(使用 TLL 时为 87.2mg 蛋白/g 载体,使用 RML 时为 310mg/g,使用 Lecitase® Ultra 时为 180mg/g)。所有新制备物的热稳定性都远低于标准的辛基-Sepharose®固定化制备物,而在存在有机共溶剂的情况下进行失活时则相反。关于水解活性,结果强烈依赖于底物和测量的 pH 值。与 p-NPB 相比,辛基-Sepharose®固定化的酶比固定在 MCI GEL® CHP20P 上的酶更活跃,而 RML 对甲基苯基乙酸酯的活性降低了 700 倍。因此,需要对这种基质上的脂肪酶的固定化进行经验评估,因为在某些情况下它可能会产生非常积极的效果,而在其他情况下它可能会产生非常消极的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c67/6271320/bc8bd5dc6d74/molecules-19-07629-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验