Stark Jonathan S, Kim Stacy L, Oliver John S
Terrestrial and Nearshore Ecosystems Program, Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia.
Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 11;9(2):e98802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098802. eCollection 2014.
The impacts of two Antarctic stations in different regions, on marine sediment macrofaunal communities were compared: McMurdo, a very large station in the Ross Sea; and Casey, a more typical small station in East Antarctica. Community structure and diversity were compared along a gradient of anthropogenic disturbance from heavily contaminated to uncontaminated locations. We examined some of the inherent problems in comparing data from unrelated studies, such as different sampling methods, spatial and temporal scales of sampling and taxonomic uncertainty. These issues generated specific biases which were taken into account when interpreting patterns. Control sites in the two regions had very different communities but both were dominated by crustaceans. Community responses to anthropogenic disturbance (sediment contamination by metals, oils and sewage) were also different. At McMurdo the proportion of crustaceans decreased in disturbed areas and polychaetes became dominant, whereas at Casey, crustaceans increased in response to disturbance, largely through an increase in amphipods. Despite differing overall community responses there were some common elements. Ostracods, cumaceans and echinoderms were sensitive to disturbance in both regions. Capitellid, dorvelleid and orbiniid polychaetes were indicative of disturbed sites. Amphipods, isopods and tanaids had different responses at each station. Biodiversity and taxonomic distinctness were significantly lower at disturbed locations in both regions. The size of the impact, however, was not related to the level of contamination, with a larger reduction in biodiversity at Casey, the smaller, less polluted station. The impacts of small stations, with low to moderate levels of contamination, can thus be as great as those of large or heavily contaminated stations. Regional broad scale environmental influences may be important in determining the composition of communities and thus their response to disturbance, but there are some generalizations regarding responses which will aid future management of stations.
罗斯海的大型科考站麦克默多站;以及南极东部较为典型的小型科考站凯西站。沿着从严重污染到未受污染地点的人为干扰梯度,比较了群落结构和多样性。我们研究了比较无关研究数据时存在的一些固有问题,例如不同的采样方法、采样的空间和时间尺度以及分类学的不确定性。这些问题产生了特定的偏差,在解释模式时已将其考虑在内。两个区域的对照点群落差异很大,但均以甲壳类动物为主。群落对人为干扰(金属、石油和污水对沉积物的污染)的反应也不同。在麦克默多站,受干扰区域的甲壳类动物比例下降,多毛类动物成为优势种,而在凯西站,甲壳类动物对干扰的反应是增加,主要是通过端足类动物数量的增加。尽管总体群落反应不同,但也有一些共同因素。介形虫、涟虫和棘皮动物在两个区域对干扰都很敏感。小头虫科、多齿围沙蚕属和奥尔比虫科多毛类动物是受干扰地点的指示物种。端足类动物、等足类动物和异足类动物在每个科考站的反应不同。两个区域受干扰地点的生物多样性和分类独特性均显著较低。然而,影响的大小与污染程度无关,污染程度较低的小型凯西站生物多样性的减少幅度更大。因此,污染程度低至中等的小型科考站的影响可能与大型或污染严重的科考站一样大。区域尺度的广泛环境影响在决定群落组成以及群落对干扰的反应方面可能很重要,但关于这些反应有一些一般性结论,这将有助于未来科考站的管理。