• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科重症监护研究中的困境

Dilemmas in undertaking research in paediatric intensive care.

作者信息

Kanthimathinathan Hari Krishnan, Scholefield Barnaby R

机构信息

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2014 Nov;99(11):1043-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304871. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2013-304871
PMID:24919710
Abstract

Providing evidence-based interventions for infants and children is important in paediatric intensive care, where decision making impacts most acutely on morbidity and mortality. However, despite the major progress of medicine in the 21st century, we still lack this evidence for majority of the decisions we make. In this article, we explore and suggest possible solutions for several dilemmas faced by paediatric intensive care researchers. These include ethical dilemmas such as validity of informed consent, use of deferred consent, balancing risk versus benefit and methodological dilemmas such as how to generate high-quality evidence with low-patient volume, choice of valid outcome measures and how best to use research and researchers' networks.

摘要

在儿科重症监护中,为婴幼儿提供循证干预措施非常重要,因为在此环境下,决策对发病率和死亡率的影响最为直接。然而,尽管21世纪医学取得了重大进展,但对于我们所做的大多数决策,我们仍然缺乏相关证据。在本文中,我们探讨并提出了儿科重症监护研究人员面临的几个困境的可能解决方案。这些困境包括伦理困境,如知情同意的有效性、延期同意的使用、风险与益处的权衡,以及方法学困境,如如何在低患者数量的情况下产生高质量证据、有效结局指标的选择,以及如何最好地利用研究和研究人员网络。

相似文献

1
Dilemmas in undertaking research in paediatric intensive care.儿科重症监护研究中的困境
Arch Dis Child. 2014 Nov;99(11):1043-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304871. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
2
Clarification.澄清。
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Mar;100(3):291. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304871.cl.
3
Ethical problems in pediatric critical care: consent.儿科重症监护中的伦理问题:同意
Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5 Suppl):S407-10. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065274.46402.DB.
4
Attitudes to end-of-life decisions in paediatric intensive care.儿科重症监护中对临终决策的态度。
Nurs Ethics. 2009 Jan;16(1):83-92. doi: 10.1177/0969733008097994.
5
Children are not small adults: documentation of assent for research involving children.儿童并非缩小版的成人:关于儿童参与研究的同意书记录。
J Pediatr. 2006 Jul;149(1 Suppl):S31-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.048.
6
Resources employed by health researchers to ensure ethical research practice.健康研究人员用于确保研究实践符合伦理道德的资源。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Jun;5(2):21-34. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.21.
7
Ethical challenges in conducting research on dying patients and those at high risk of dying.对临终患者和高危死亡患者进行研究的伦理挑战。
Account Res. 2012;19(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.622173.
8
[End of life in paediatric intensive care units: the intensivist's point of view].[儿科重症监护病房的临终关怀:重症监护医生的观点]
Arch Pediatr. 2010 Jun;17(6):970-1. doi: 10.1016/S0929-693X(10)70203-7.
9
Ethics of drug research in the pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房药物研究的伦理问题。
Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Feb;17(1):43-53. doi: 10.1007/s40272-014-0101-5.
10
Protecting participants of clinical trials conducted in the intensive care unit.保护重症监护病房临床试验的参与者。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):237-49. doi: 10.1177/0885066610390867.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing early rehabilitation and mobilisation for children in UK paediatric intensive care units: the PERMIT feasibility study.在英国儿科重症监护病房实施儿童早期康复和活动:PERMIT 可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Nov;27(27):1-155. doi: 10.3310/HYRW5688.
2
Complex and alternate consent pathways in clinical trials: methodological and ethical challenges encountered by underserved groups and a call to action.临床试验中的复杂和替代同意途径:服务不足群体遇到的方法学和伦理挑战及行动呼吁。
Trials. 2023 Feb 28;24(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07159-6.
3
Guardians and research staff experiences and views about the consent process in hospital-based paediatric research studies in urban Malawi: A qualitative study.
监护人及研究人员对马拉维城市医院儿科研究中知情同意过程的经验和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00865-x.
4
A Survey of Resources and Nursing Workforce for Clinical Research Delivery in Paediatric Intensive Care Within the UK / Ireland.英国/爱尔兰儿科重症监护临床研究资源与护理人力调查
Front Pediatr. 2022 May 2;10:848378. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.848378. eCollection 2022.
5
COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities for research nursing and nursing research on paediatric intensive care.新型冠状病毒肺炎:儿科重症监护中研究护理与护理研究面临的挑战与机遇
Nurs Crit Care. 2020 Sep;25(5):321-323. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12531. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
6
Doing more of less: what registry data tell us about death in PICU.少做多得:登记数据告诉我们的关于儿科重症监护病房死亡的情况。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Sep;45(9):1272-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05714-x. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
7
Acute Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Children.危重症患儿的急性康复
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;4(4):171-173. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563384.
8
Therapeutic hypothermia after paediatric cardiac arrest: Pooled randomized controlled trials.儿科心搏骤停后治疗性低温:汇总随机对照试验。
Resuscitation. 2018 Dec;133:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
9
Patient and public involvement in Paediatric Intensive Care research: considerations, challenges and facilitating factors.患者及公众参与儿科重症监护研究:考量因素、挑战及促进因素
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Nov 7;2:32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0046-7. eCollection 2016.
10
Transforming PICU Culture to Facilitate Early Rehabilitation.转变儿科重症监护病房文化以促进早期康复
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;4(4):204-211. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563547.