• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Industry actors, think tanks, and alcohol policy in the United kingdom.英国的行业参与者、智库和酒精政策。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1363-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301858. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
2
Vested interests in addiction research and policy. The challenge corporate lobbying poses to reducing society's alcohol problems: insights from UK evidence on minimum unit pricing.成瘾研究与政策中的既得利益。企业游说对减少社会酒精问题构成的挑战:来自英国最低单位定价证据的见解。
Addiction. 2014 Feb;109(2):199-205. doi: 10.1111/add.12380. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
3
Cleavages and co-operation in the UK alcohol industry: a qualitative study.英国酒精行业的分歧与合作:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 26;12:483. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-483.
4
Policy congruence and advocacy strategies in the discourse networks of minimum unit pricing for alcohol and the soft drinks industry levy.政策一致性与最低单位酒精定价和软饮料行业征税的话语网络中的倡导策略。
Addiction. 2020 Dec;115(12):2303-2314. doi: 10.1111/add.15068. Epub 2020 May 30.
5
The alcohol industry, charities and policy influence in the UK.英国的酒精行业、慈善机构与政策影响
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Aug;24(4):557-61. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku076. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
6
"Working the system"--British American tobacco's influence on the European union treaty and its implications for policy: an analysis of internal tobacco industry documents.“玩转体制”——英美烟草对欧盟条约的影响及其对政策的启示:对内部烟草业文件的分析。
PLoS Med. 2010 Jan 12;7(1):e1000202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000202.
7
Vested interests in addiction research and policy. Why do we not see the corporate interests of the alcohol industry as clearly as we see those of the tobacco industry?成瘾研究和政策中的既得利益。为什么我们没有像看到烟草业那样清楚地看到酒精业的企业利益?
Addiction. 2013 Apr;108(4):680-5. doi: 10.1111/add.12011.
8
Mapping discourse coalitions in the minimum unit pricing for alcohol debate: a discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage.绘制酒精最低单位定价辩论中的话语联盟图谱:对英国报纸报道的话语网络分析。
Addiction. 2019 Apr;114(4):741-753. doi: 10.1111/add.14514. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
9
Between a rock and a hard place: Economic expansion and social responsibility in UK media discourses on the global alcohol industry.进退两难:英国媒体关于全球酒精行业的论述中的经济扩张与社会责任
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;175:169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
The atlas network: a "strategic ally" of the tobacco industry.地图集网络:烟草行业的“战略盟友”。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Oct;32(4):433-448. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2351. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Corporate social responsibility, policy framing and strategic marketing: understanding the alcohol industry's use of social media in Uganda.企业社会责任、政策框架与战略营销:理解乌干达酒类行业对社交媒体的运用。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2024 Jun 20;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13011-024-00611-z.
2
Under the influence: system-level effects of alcohol industry-funded health information organizations.受影响之下:酒类行业资助的健康信息组织的系统层面影响。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Dec 1;38(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad167.
3
Political and socioeconomic factors that shaped health taxes implementation in Peru.影响秘鲁健康税实施的政治和社会经济因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012024.
4
The emperor has no clothes: a synthesis of findings from the Transformative Research on the Alcohol industry, Policy and Science research programme.皇帝没穿衣服:转化酒精产业研究、政策和科学研究计划研究结果综述。
Addiction. 2023 Mar;118(3):558-566. doi: 10.1111/add.16058. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
5
Förnuft och känsla - Kunskapsbruk hos gårdagens förbudskritiker och dagens alkoholliberaler.理性与情感——昨日禁酒批评者和今日酒精自由主义者的知识运用。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022 Jun;39(3):240-261. doi: 10.1177/14550725211072631. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
6
The Views of Researchers on the Alcohol Industry's Involvement in Science: Findings from an Interview Study.研究者对酒精行业参与科学研究的看法:一项访谈研究的结果。
Eur Addict Res. 2022;28(4):267-274. doi: 10.1159/000522603. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
7
Reconceptualising the study of alcohol policy decision-making: the contribution of political science.重新审视酒精政策决策研究:政治学的贡献。
Addict Res Theory. 2020 Jun 9;29(5):427-435. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2020.1773445. eCollection 2021.
8
Alcohol policy, multi-level governance and corporate political strategy: The campaign for Scotland's minimum unit pricing in Edinburgh, London and Brussels.酒精政策、多层次治理与企业政治战略:爱丁堡、伦敦和布鲁塞尔关于苏格兰最低单位定价的运动。
Br J Polit Int Relat. 2021 Aug;23(3):391-409. doi: 10.1177/1369148120959040. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
9
Alcohol marketing versus public health: David and Goliath?酒精营销与公共卫生:大卫与歌利亚?
Global Health. 2021 Apr 12;17(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00696-2.
10
'Tied up in a legal mess': The alcohol industry's use of litigation to oppose minimum alcohol pricing in Scotland.“陷入法律困境”:酒精行业利用诉讼反对苏格兰的最低酒精定价
Scott Aff. 2020 Feb;29(1):3-23. doi: 10.3366/scot.2020.0304.

本文引用的文献

1
Vested interests in addiction research and policy. The challenge corporate lobbying poses to reducing society's alcohol problems: insights from UK evidence on minimum unit pricing.成瘾研究与政策中的既得利益。企业游说对减少社会酒精问题构成的挑战:来自英国最低单位定价证据的见解。
Addiction. 2014 Feb;109(2):199-205. doi: 10.1111/add.12380. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
2
Be aware of Drinkaware.留意“饮酒须知”组织。
Addiction. 2014 Apr;109(4):519-24. doi: 10.1111/add.12356. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
3
Government drops plans for minimum alcohol pricing in England and Wales.英国政府放弃在英格兰和威尔士实施最低酒精定价的计划。
BMJ. 2013 Jul 18;347:f4622. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4622.
4
Industry use of evidence to influence alcohol policy: a case study of submissions to the 2008 Scottish government consultation.行业利用证据影响酒精政策:以 2008 年苏格兰政府咨询为例的研究。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001431. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
5
Vested Interests in addiction research and policy. Alliance between tobacco and alcohol industries to shape public policy.在成瘾研究和政策方面存在既得利益。烟草和酒精行业之间的联盟来塑造公共政策。
Addiction. 2013 May;108(5):852-64. doi: 10.1111/add.12134.
6
Misleading UK alcohol industry criticism of Canadian research on minimum pricing.英国酒精行业对加拿大最低定价研究的误导性批评。
Addiction. 2013 Jun;108(6):1172-3. doi: 10.1111/add.12178.
7
Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries.利润与大流行病:预防烟草、酒精和超加工食品及饮料行业的有害影响。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):670-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62089-3. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
8
The relationship between minimum alcohol prices, outlet densities and alcohol-attributable deaths in British Columbia, 2002-09.2002-09 年不列颠哥伦比亚省最低酒价、销售点密度与酒精相关死亡人数之间的关系。
Addiction. 2013 Jun;108(6):1059-69. doi: 10.1111/add.12139. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
9
Public health, academic medicine, and the alcohol industry's corporate social responsibility activities.公共卫生、学术医学与酒精行业的企业社会责任活动。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Feb;103(2):206-14. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300847. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
10
On the state of public health in England.关于英格兰的公共卫生状况。
Lancet. 2012 Nov 24;380(9856):1793-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61955-2. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

英国的行业参与者、智库和酒精政策。

Industry actors, think tanks, and alcohol policy in the United kingdom.

机构信息

Benjamin Hawkins and Jim McCambridge are with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1363-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301858. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301858
PMID:24922137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4103247/
Abstract

Corporate actors seek to influence alcohol policies through various means, including attempts to shape the evidential content of policy debates. In this case study, we examined how SABMiller engaged the think tank Demos to produce reports on binge drinking, which were heavily promoted among policymakers at crucial stages in the development of the UK government's 2012 alcohol strategy. One key report coincided with other SABMiller-funded publications, advocating measures to enhance parenting as an alternative to minimum unit pricing. In this instance, the perceived independence of an influential think tank was used to promote industry interests in tactics similar to those of transnational tobacco corporations. This approach is in keeping with other alcohol industry efforts to marginalize the peer-reviewed literature.

摘要

企业行为体试图通过各种手段影响酒精政策,包括试图塑造政策辩论的证据内容。在这个案例研究中,我们研究了 SABMiller 如何聘请智库 Demos 制作关于狂饮的报告,这些报告在英国政府 2012 年酒精战略制定的关键阶段,在政策制定者中得到了大力推广。一份关键报告恰逢 SABMiller 资助的其他出版物,倡导采取措施加强育儿,作为最低单位定价的替代方案。在这种情况下,利用有影响力的智库的表面独立性来推动行业利益,采取类似于跨国烟草公司的策略。这种方法符合酒精行业将同行评议文献边缘化的其他努力。