Waligora Marcin, Dranseika Vilius, Piasecki Jan
Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Michalowskiego 12, Krakow 31-126, Poland.
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Jun 13;15:44. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-44.
Assent is an important ethical and legal requirement of paediatric research. Unfortunately, there are significant differences between the guidelines on the details of assent.
What often remains unclear is the scope of the assent, the procedure for acquiring it, and the way in which children's capacity to assent is determined. There is a general growing tendency that suggests that the process of assent should be personalised, that is, tailored to a particular child. This article supports the idea of personalisation. However, we also propose placing limits on personalisation by introducing a suggested requirement of assent starting at a school-age threshold. In some situations RECs/IRBs and researchers could reduce the suggested threshold.
A recommended age threshold is likely to serve the interests of children better than ambiguous and flexible criteria for personalised age determination.
同意是儿科研究重要的伦理和法律要求。不幸的是,关于同意细节的指南之间存在显著差异。
通常仍不明确的是同意的范围、获取同意的程序以及确定儿童同意能力的方式。普遍存在一种日益增长的趋势,即同意过程应个性化,也就是说,应针对特定儿童量身定制。本文支持个性化的观点。然而,我们也提议通过引入从学龄门槛开始的同意建议要求来对个性化加以限制。在某些情况下,伦理审查委员会/机构审查委员会及研究人员可以降低建议的门槛。
推荐的年龄门槛可能比用于个性化年龄确定的模糊且灵活的标准更符合儿童的利益。