Kozarek R A, Patterson D J, Gelfand M D, Botoman V A, Ball T J, Wilske K R
Virginia Mason Clinic, Seattle, Washington.
Ann Intern Med. 1989 Mar 1;110(5):353-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-5-353.
To determine whether methotrexate has anti-inflammatory activity in refractory inflammatory bowel disease.
Nonrandomized, open-label, preliminary trial of methotrexate along with standard medications for 12 weeks.
Referral-based gastroenterology practice.
Twenty-one patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (14, Crohn disease; 7, chronic ulcerative colitis); 17 taking variable doses of corticosteroids and 14 on sulfasalazine or metronidazole. Of the 21 patients, 10 had previously failed azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine trials.
Sulfasalazine and metronidazole were continued and prednisone dose was tapered according to clinical response. Methotrexate was given as a 25-mg intramuscular injection weekly for 12 weeks, then switched to a tapering oral dose if a clinical and objective improvement was noted.
Sixteen of twenty-one patients (11 of 14 patients with Crohn disease, 5 of 7 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis) had an objective response as measured by disease activity indices (modified Crohn's Disease Activity Index, 13.3 to 5.4 [P = 0.0001], Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index, 13.3 to 6.3 [P = 0.007]). Prednisone dosage decreased from 21.4 mg +/- 5.6 (SEM) to 5.5 mg +/- 2.0; P = 0.006 and 38.6 mg +/- 6.35 to 12.9 mg +/- 3.4; P = 0.01, respectively. Five patients with Crohn colitis had colonoscopic healing and 4 had normal histology at 12 weeks. In contrast, none of the 7 patients with ulcerative colitis had normal flexible sigmoidoscopies, despite histologic improvement in 5. Side effects included mild rises in transaminase levels in 2 patients, transient leukopenia in 1, self-limited diarrhea and nausea in 2 patients, and 1 case each of brittle nails and atypical pneumonitis.
Although this pilot study is encouraging, further work is needed before methotrexate can be recommended for inflammatory bowel disease.
确定甲氨蝶呤在难治性炎症性肠病中是否具有抗炎活性。
甲氨蝶呤与标准药物联合使用12周的非随机、开放标签的初步试验。
基于转诊的胃肠病学实践。
21例难治性炎症性肠病患者(14例克罗恩病;7例慢性溃疡性结肠炎);17例服用不同剂量的皮质类固醇,14例服用柳氮磺胺吡啶或甲硝唑。在这21例患者中,10例先前使用硫唑嘌呤或6-巯基嘌呤试验失败。
继续使用柳氮磺胺吡啶和甲硝唑,并根据临床反应逐渐减少泼尼松剂量。甲氨蝶呤每周肌肉注射25mg,共12周,如果观察到临床和客观改善,则改为逐渐减量的口服剂量。
21例患者中有16例(14例克罗恩病患者中的11例,7例慢性溃疡性结肠炎患者中的5例)通过疾病活动指数测量有客观反应(改良克罗恩病活动指数,从13.3降至5.4 [P = 0.0001],溃疡性结肠炎活动指数,从13.3降至6.3 [P = 0.007])。泼尼松剂量分别从21.4mg±5.6(标准误)降至5.5mg±2.0;P = 0.006,以及从38.6mg±6.35降至12.9mg±3.4;P = 0.01。5例克罗恩结肠炎患者在12周时结肠镜检查愈合,4例组织学正常。相比之下,7例溃疡性结肠炎患者中无一例乙状结肠镜检查正常,尽管5例组织学有改善。副作用包括2例患者转氨酶水平轻度升高,1例短暂性白细胞减少,2例患者自限性腹泻和恶心,以及各1例脆甲和非典型肺炎。
尽管这项初步研究令人鼓舞,但在推荐甲氨蝶呤用于炎症性肠病之前,还需要进一步研究。