Suppr超能文献

针对爱尔兰纵向老龄化研究中自我报告的听力问题,对照低语语音测试进行验证。

Validation of the self-reported hearing questions in the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing against the Whispered Voice Test.

作者信息

Kenny Gibson William, Cronin Hilary, Kenny Rose Anne, Setti Annalisa

机构信息

The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, TILDA, Trinity College Dublin, Chemistry Extension Building, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jun 14;7:361. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-361.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self report questions are often used in population studies to assess sensory efficacy and decline. These questions differ in their validity in assessing sensory impairment depending on the wording of the question and the characteristics of the population. We tested the validity of the self-report questions on hearing efficacy (self reported hearing, ability in following a conversation, use of a telephone and use of hearing aids) used in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).

METHODS

We tested sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values of each question against the Whispered Voice Test, a relatively easy to administer and cost effective alternative to the standard audiometric test.

RESULTS

In this population the question 'Is your hearing (with or without a hearing appliance)/ Excellent/Very Good/Good/Fair/Poor?' showed the best diagnostic value in relation to the other questions (sensitivity 55.56% and specificity 94.67%). The question 'Can you use a normal telephone?' was deemed ineffective because of a very poor sensitivity (5.56%) and was proposed for exclusion from subsequent waves of TILDA.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that this validity check was useful to select the questions that most effectively assess hearing deficits and provided crucial information for the subsequent waves. We argue that longitudinal studies using self-reports of sensory efficacy would benefit from a similar check.

摘要

背景

在人群研究中,自我报告问题常被用于评估感官功能及衰退情况。这些问题在评估感官损伤时的有效性因问题措辞和人群特征而异。我们测试了爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究(TILDA)中使用的关于听力功能的自我报告问题(自我报告的听力、对话理解能力、电话使用情况及助听器使用情况)的有效性。

方法

我们针对低语测试(一种相对易于实施且成本效益高的标准听力测试替代方法)测试了每个问题的敏感性和特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。

结果

在该人群中,问题“您的听力(无论是否使用听力辅助器具)/优秀/非常好/好/一般/差?”相对于其他问题显示出最佳诊断价值(敏感性55.56%,特异性94.67%)。问题“您能使用普通电话吗?”因敏感性极低(5.56%)而被认为无效,并建议在TILDA后续研究中排除该问题。

结论

我们表明这种有效性检查有助于选择最有效地评估听力缺陷的问题,并为后续研究提供关键信息。我们认为,使用感官功能自我报告的纵向研究将受益于类似的检查。

相似文献

9
Does this patient have hearing impairment?这位患者有听力障碍吗?
JAMA. 2006 Jan 25;295(4):416-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.4.416.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States.美国老年人听力损失的患病率及相关风险因素。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 May;66(5):582-90. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr002. Epub 2011 Feb 27.
8
Hearing acuity as a predictor of walking difficulties in older women.听力敏锐度可预测老年女性的行走困难。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Dec;57(12):2282-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02553.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
9
Hearing as a predictor of falls and postural balance in older female twins.听力作为老年女性双胞胎跌倒和姿势平衡的预测指标。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Feb;64(2):312-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gln015. Epub 2009 Jan 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验