• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我报告的视力障碍与全因死亡率之间的纵向关联:一项针对中国老年成年人的全国代表性队列研究。

Longitudinal associations between self-reported vision impairment and all-cause mortality: a nationally representative cohort study among older Chinese adults.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;107(11):1597-1605. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2022-321577. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1136/bjo-2022-321577
PMID:35985659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10646848/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of pre-existing and new self-reported vision impairment (VI), and its correction, on all-cause mortality among Chinese adults aged 45 years and older.

METHODS

We used four waves of data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Our analytical cohort consists of 15 808 participants aged 45 years and older with an average follow-up of 6.4 years. Exposures included pre-existing self-reported VI and vision correction (time-independent exposures), new self-reported VI and vision correction (time-dependent exposures). Outcomes were measured as the risk of all-cause mortality and the risk stratification for pre-specified factors.

RESULTS

Compared with participants with normal vision, all-cause mortality was higher among those with pre-existing self-reported VI (crude HR (cHR)=1.29, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.44; adjusted HR (aHR)=1.22, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.37) and new self-reported VI (cHR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.58; aHR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.21 to 1.51). Mortality risk was lower among those with high school or higher education. Participants who were wearing eyeglasses/contact lenses or had cataract surgery at baseline did not have significantly higher all-cause mortality (eyeglasses: aHR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.02; cataract surgery: aHR=1.12, 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.69) compared with participants with normal vision. The same was true among participants with new correction of self-reported VI (glasses: aHR=1.01, 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.24; cataract surgery: aHR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Both pre-existing and new self-reported VI increase all-cause mortality among Chinese adults aged 45 years and older, though visual correction reduces this risk.

摘要

目的

比较中国 45 岁及以上成年人中既往和新报告的视力障碍(VI)及其矫正对全因死亡率的影响。

方法

我们使用了中国健康与退休纵向研究的四波数据。我们的分析队列包括 15808 名年龄在 45 岁及以上、平均随访 6.4 年的参与者。暴露因素包括既往自我报告的 VI 和视力矫正(时间独立暴露),新的自我报告的 VI 和视力矫正(时间依赖暴露)。结果以全因死亡率和预先指定因素的风险分层来衡量。

结果

与视力正常的参与者相比,既往自我报告 VI(粗 HR(cHR)=1.29,95%可信区间:1.17 至 1.44;调整 HR(aHR)=1.22,95%可信区间:1.09 至 1.37)和新自我报告 VI(cHR=1.42,95%可信区间:1.28 至 1.58;aHR=1.36,95%可信区间:1.21 至 1.51)的全因死亡率更高。具有高中或以上学历的参与者死亡率风险较低。基线时戴眼镜/隐形眼镜或接受白内障手术的参与者全因死亡率没有显著升高(眼镜:aHR=0.82,95%可信区间:0.65 至 1.02;白内障手术:aHR=1.12,95%可信区间:0.74 至 1.69),与视力正常的参与者相比。同样的情况也适用于新报告的 VI 自我矫正的参与者(眼镜:aHR=1.01,95%可信区间:0.78 至 1.24;白内障手术:aHR=0.95,95%可信区间:0.68 至 1.31)。

结论

既往和新报告的 VI 均会增加中国 45 岁及以上成年人的全因死亡率,尽管视力矫正可以降低这种风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b89f/10646848/318df42f4329/bjo-2022-321577f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b89f/10646848/3e767b31ff14/bjo-2022-321577f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b89f/10646848/34a20188db6a/bjo-2022-321577f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b89f/10646848/318df42f4329/bjo-2022-321577f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b89f/10646848/3e767b31ff14/bjo-2022-321577f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b89f/10646848/34a20188db6a/bjo-2022-321577f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b89f/10646848/318df42f4329/bjo-2022-321577f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Longitudinal associations between self-reported vision impairment and all-cause mortality: a nationally representative cohort study among older Chinese adults.自我报告的视力障碍与全因死亡率之间的纵向关联:一项针对中国老年成年人的全国代表性队列研究。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;107(11):1597-1605. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2022-321577. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
Dual Sensory Impairment as a Predictor of Loneliness and Isolation in Older Adults: National Cohort Study.双重感觉障碍与老年人孤独及隔离的关系:全国队列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Nov 14;8(11):e39314. doi: 10.2196/39314.
3
Correction of visual impairment by cataract surgery and improved survival in older persons: the Blue Mountains Eye Study cohort.白内障手术矫正视力损害和提高老年人生存率:蓝山眼研究队列。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Sep;120(9):1720-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 May 9.
4
Longitudinal Associations of Self-reported Vision Impairment With Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Older Adults in the United States.美国老年人自述视力障碍与焦虑和抑郁症状的纵向关联。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):793-800. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1085.
5
Prevalence of Concurrent Functional Vision and Hearing Impairment and Association With Dementia in Community-Dwelling Medicare Beneficiaries.社区居住的 Medicare 受益人中同时存在功能性视力和听力障碍的患病率及其与痴呆的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211558. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1558.
6
Self-reported vision impairment, vision correction, and depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older Chinese: Findings from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.中老年中国人自述的视力障碍、视力矫正和抑郁症状:来自中国健康与退休纵向研究的发现。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;36(1):86-95. doi: 10.1002/gps.5398. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
7
Self-reported Eyeglass Use by US Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years or Older.美国 Medicare 受益人的自报戴镜情况。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 1;136(9):1047-1050. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.2524.
8
Dynamic associations between vision and hearing impairment and depressive symptoms among older Chinese adults.中国老年人视力和听力障碍与抑郁症状之间的动态关联。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Jan;116:105217. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105217. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
9
Prevalence Factors Associated With Vision Impairment and Blindness Among Individuals 85 Years and Older in Russia.俄罗斯 85 岁及以上人群视力障碍和失明的相关流行因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121138. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21138.
10
Determinants of Visual Impairment Among Chinese Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Risk Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Algorithms.中国中老年人群视力障碍的决定因素:基于机器学习算法的风险预测模型。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Oct 9;7:e59810. doi: 10.2196/59810.

引用本文的文献

1
Unilateral Visual Impairment and Increased Mortality: The UK Biobank Cohort Study.单侧视力损害与死亡率增加:英国生物银行队列研究
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jul 1;14(7):17. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.7.17.
2
Association of nonrefractive visual impairment with risk of all-cause and specific-cause mortality in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2008.1999年至2008年美国国家健康与营养检查调查中,非屈光性视力损害与全因死亡率及特定病因死亡率风险的关联
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):1109. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22249-7.
3
All-cause and cardiovascular mortality in dual sensory impairment patients: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal Association Between Self-Reported Sensory Impairments and Episodic Memory among Older Adults in China: A Prospective Cohort Study.中国老年人自报告的感觉障碍与情景记忆之间的纵向关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2022 May;35(3):382-391. doi: 10.1177/08919887211006467. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
2
The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020.《柳叶刀》全球眼健康委员会:2020年之后的愿景。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Apr;9(4):e489-e551. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30488-5. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
Association between vision impairment and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
双重感觉障碍患者的全因和心血管死亡率:队列研究的荟萃分析。
J Glob Health. 2024 Nov 29;14:04258. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04258.
4
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a digital technology-driven hierarchical healthcare screening pattern in China.数字技术驱动的分层医疗保健筛查模式在中国的成本效益和成本效用分析。
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 30;15(1):3650. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47211-w.
5
Self-rated eyesight among healthy older Australians: Baseline results of the ASPREE Longitudinal Study of Older Persons.澳大利亚健康老年人自评视力:ASPREE 老年人纵向研究的基线结果。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;51(5):413-424. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14233. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
视力障碍与死亡率的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Apr;9(4):e418-e430. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30549-0. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
4
Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.30 多年来盲症和远距离及近距离视力损伤流行率的变化趋势:全球疾病负担研究的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e130-e143. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.2020 年失明和视力障碍的原因及 30 多年来的趋势,以及与 VISION 2020:看见的权利相关的可避免盲的患病率:全球疾病负担研究的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
6
Prevalence and causes of vision loss in China from 1990 to 2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990 年至 2019 年中国视力丧失的患病率和病因:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的结果。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Dec;5(12):e682-e691. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30254-1.
7
Sensory impairment and all-cause mortality among the elderly adults in China: a population-based cohort study.中国老年人的感觉障碍与全因死亡率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Nov 26;12(23):24288-24300. doi: 10.18632/aging.202198.
8
Cognitive frailty in relation to adverse health outcomes independent of multimorbidity: results from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.认知脆弱与多重疾病无关的不良健康结局的关系:来自中国健康与退休纵向研究的结果。
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Nov 18;12(22):23129-23145. doi: 10.18632/aging.104078.
9
Urban-rural disparity in prevalence of multimorbidity in China: a cross-sectional nationally representative study.中国城乡多重疾病患病率的差异:一项具有全国代表性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 16;10(11):e038404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038404.
10
Diabetic Retinopathy, Visual Impairment, and the Risk of Six-Year Death: A Cohort Study of a Rural Population in China.糖尿病视网膜病变、视力障碍与六年死亡风险:中国农村人群的队列研究。
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(6):983-990. doi: 10.1159/000512667. Epub 2020 Oct 29.