Suppr超能文献

难以下咽的苦果:一项关于女性乳腺癌辅助内分泌治疗经历的定性研究

A hard pill to swallow: a qualitative study of women's experiences of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.

作者信息

Harrow Alison, Dryden Ruth, McCowan Colin, Radley Andrew, Parsons Mark, Thompson Alastair M, Wells Mary

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Institute for Research and Innovation in Social Services, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 12;4(6):e005285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005285.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore women's experiences of taking adjuvant endocrine therapy as a treatment for breast cancer and how their beliefs about the purpose of the medication, side effects experienced and interactions with health professionals might influence adherence.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semistructured, one-to-one interviews.

SETTING

2 hospitals from a single health board in Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

30 women who had been prescribed tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole or letrozole) and had been taking this medication for 1-5 years.

RESULTS

Women clearly wished to take their adjuvant endocrine therapy medication as prescribed, believing that it offered them protection against breast cancer recurrence. However, some women missed tablets and did not recognise that this could reduce the efficacy of the treatment. Women did not perceive that healthcare professionals were routinely or systematically monitoring their adherence. Side effects were common and impacted greatly on the women's quality of life but did not always cause women to stop taking their medication, or to seek advice about reducing the side effects they experienced. Few were offered the opportunity to discuss the impact of side effects or the potential options available.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most women in this study took adjuvant endocrine therapy as prescribed, many endured a range of side effects, often without seeking help. Advice, support and monitoring for adherence are not routinely offered in conventional follow-up settings. Women deserve more opportunity to discuss the pros, cons and impact of long-term adjuvant endocrine therapy. New service models are needed to support adherence, enhance quality of life and ultimately improve survival. These should ideally be community based, in order to promote self-management in the longer term.

摘要

目的

探讨女性接受辅助内分泌治疗作为乳腺癌治疗方法的经历,以及她们对药物作用目的的看法、所经历的副作用以及与医护人员的互动如何影响治疗依从性。

设计

采用半结构化一对一访谈的定性研究。

地点

苏格兰一个卫生委员会下属的两家医院。

参与者

30名已被开处他莫昔芬或芳香化酶抑制剂(阿那曲唑或来曲唑)且已服用该药物1至5年的女性。

结果

女性明确希望按规定服用辅助内分泌治疗药物,认为这能保护她们预防乳腺癌复发。然而,一些女性会漏服药物,且未意识到这会降低治疗效果。女性认为医护人员没有常规或系统地监测她们的依从性。副作用很常见,对女性的生活质量有很大影响,但并不总是导致女性停止服药或寻求减轻所经历副作用的建议。很少有人有机会讨论副作用的影响或可用的潜在选择。

结论

尽管本研究中的大多数女性按规定接受辅助内分泌治疗,但许多人忍受着一系列副作用,且常常不寻求帮助。在传统的随访环境中,通常不会提供关于依从性的建议、支持和监测。女性应该有更多机会讨论长期辅助内分泌治疗的利弊及影响。需要新的服务模式来支持依从性、提高生活质量并最终改善生存率。理想情况下,这些模式应以社区为基础,以便从长远促进自我管理。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Health literacy.健康素养
BMJ. 2012 Mar 22;344:e2188. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2188.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验