Hampson D J, Mhoma J R, Combs B, Buddle J R
School of Veterinary Studies, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia.
Epidemiol Infect. 1989 Feb;102(1):75-84. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800029708.
Antisera were prepared in rabbits against seven well-characterized strains of Treponema hyodysenteriae of known serotype, and reacted in agarose gel double immunodiffusion tests (AGDP) with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) extracted from 18 Western Australian isolates of the organism. Eight isolates were provisionally typed by this method, but sera raised against one 'typed' and two 'untypable' local isolates reacted in an unexpected fashion with LPS from other local and type strains. Serum raised against the 'typed' local isolate reached with LPS from other previously untyped local isolates: this indicated the presence of more than one major LPS antigen amongst certain local isolates, and was confirmed by cross-absorption of sera. Sera raised against apparently untypable local isolates reacted with LPS from certain type organisms, thus suggesting the presence of complex antigenic relationships between LPS antigens. The serotyping system for T. hyodysenteriae which was proposed by Baum & Joens (1979) uses unabsorbed antisera and is made unworkable by these observations. Instead we propose placing organisms which share common LPS antigens into serogroups A to E, members of which are defined by their reactivity with unabsorbed sera raised against a type organism for the group. We suggest strains B78, WA1, B169, A1 and WA6 respectively as being the most suitable type organisms for the five serogroups identified so far. Isolates possessing additional unique LPS antigens can be regarded as serotypes within the serogroup. However the serotype of an isolate can only be established if antiserum is prepared against it, and this serum continues to react homologously after cross-absorption with bacteria from other serotypes within the serogroup.
用已知血清型的7株特征明确的猪痢疾密螺旋体免疫家兔制备抗血清,并在琼脂糖凝胶双向免疫扩散试验(AGDP)中与从西澳大利亚分离的18株该菌提取的脂多糖(LPS)反应。用这种方法对8株分离株进行了初步分型,但针对1株“已分型”和2株“未分型”本地分离株制备的抗血清,与其他本地菌株和标准菌株的LPS发生了意外反应。针对“已分型”本地分离株制备的抗血清与其他先前未分型的本地分离株的LPS发生反应:这表明某些本地分离株中存在不止一种主要LPS抗原,血清交叉吸收试验证实了这一点。针对明显未分型的本地分离株制备的抗血清与某些标准菌株的LPS发生反应,因此表明LPS抗原之间存在复杂的抗原关系。Baum和Joens(1979)提出的猪痢疾密螺旋体血清分型系统使用未吸收的抗血清,而这些观察结果使其无法使用。相反,我们建议将具有共同LPS抗原的菌株归为A至E血清群,其中各血清群的成员由它们与针对该血清群标准菌株制备的未吸收抗血清的反应性来定义。我们分别建议菌株B78、WA1、B169、A1和WA6作为目前已鉴定的五个血清群最合适的标准菌株。具有额外独特LPS抗原的分离株可视为该血清群内的血清型。然而,只有针对某一分离株制备抗血清,且该血清在与血清群内其他血清型的细菌交叉吸收后仍能同源反应,才能确定该分离株的血清型。