Federation University, Australia.
City University London, UK.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Jul;34(5):376-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 27.
We report a meta-analysis of up to 40 data sets that examined the personality dimensions in the Five-Factor Model (FFM) and the integrated Five-Factor Model (IFFM) in relation to ADHD symptom domains of inattention (IA) and hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI). The IFFM incorporated the dimensions of other personality models (in particular, those of Eysenck, Tellegen, and Cloninger, as well as the FFM). Major findings were: (1) IA and HI were both associated with low conscientious inhibition/conscientiousness, and low agreeable inhibition/agreeableness, and with high negative emotionality/neuroticism; (2) conscientious inhibition and conscientiousness were more strongly related to IA than HI; (3) agreeable inhibition and agreeableness were more strongly related to HI than IA; and (4) the association of conscientious inhibition and conscientiousness with HI was moderated by age group and source from where participants were recruited (associations were stronger in children than adults, and clinical samples than community samples). These findings are discussed in relation to single and multiple pathway theories, underlying factors and processes for the personality-ADHD link, and clinical implications.
我们对多达 40 个数据集进行了荟萃分析，这些数据集考察了五因素模型（FFM）和整合五因素模型（IFFM）中的人格维度与 ADHD 症状领域的注意力不集中（IA）和多动/冲动（HI）之间的关系。IFFM 纳入了其他人格模型的维度（特别是 Eysenck、Tellegen 和 Cloninger 的模型，以及 FFM）。主要发现如下：（1）IA 和 HI 均与低尽责性抑制/尽责性以及低宜人性抑制/宜人性相关，与高负性情绪/神经质相关；（2）尽责性抑制和尽责性与 IA 的相关性强于 HI；（3）宜人性抑制和宜人性与 HI 的相关性强于 IA；（4）尽责性抑制和尽责性与 HI 的相关性受年龄组和参与者招募来源的调节（在儿童中比在成人中更强，在临床样本中比在社区样本中更强）。这些发现与单一和多路径理论、人格与 ADHD 关系的潜在因素和过程以及临床意义有关。
