• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品规划的途径:学术性食品系统研究综述

Avenues into Food Planning: A Review of Scholarly Food System Research.

作者信息

Brinkley Catherine

机构信息

Department of City and Regional Planning, School of Design, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Int Plan Stud. 2013 Apr 1;18(2):243-266. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2013.774150.

DOI:10.1080/13563475.2013.774150
PMID:24932131
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4053247/
Abstract

This review summarizes several avenues of planning inquiry into food systems research, revealing gaps in the literature, allied fields of study and mismatches between scholarly disciplines and the food system life cycle. Planners and scholars in associated fields have identified and defined problems in the food system as 'wicked' problems, complex environmental issues that require systemic solutions at the community scale. While food justice scholars have contextualized problem areas, planning scholars have made a broad case for planning involvement in solving these wicked problems while ensuring that the functional and beneficial parts of the food system continue to thrive. This review maps the entry points of scholarly interest in food systems and planning's contributions to its study, charting a research agenda for the future.

摘要

本综述总结了对粮食系统研究进行规划性探究的几种途径,揭示了文献、相关研究领域中的差距,以及学术学科与粮食系统生命周期之间的不匹配。相关领域的规划者和学者已将粮食系统中的问题识别并定义为“棘手”问题,即需要在社区层面采取系统性解决方案的复杂环境问题。虽然粮食正义学者已将问题领域置于具体情境中,但规划学者已广泛论证了规划参与解决这些棘手问题的必要性,同时确保粮食系统的功能性和有益部分能够持续蓬勃发展。本综述梳理了学术界对粮食系统感兴趣的切入点以及规划对其研究的贡献,绘制了未来的研究议程。

相似文献

1
Avenues into Food Planning: A Review of Scholarly Food System Research.食品规划的途径:学术性食品系统研究综述
Int Plan Stud. 2013 Apr 1;18(2):243-266. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2013.774150.
2
Thinking of selection and widening access as complex and wicked problems.将选择和扩大入学机会视为复杂和棘手的问题。
Med Educ. 2018 Dec;52(12):1228-1239. doi: 10.1111/medu.13670. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
3
Translating land justice through comparison: a US-French dialogue and research agenda.通过比较来阐释土地正义:美法对话与研究议程
Agric Human Values. 2021;38(4):865-880. doi: 10.1007/s10460-021-10202-4. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
4
Tackling 'wicked' health promotion problems: a New Zealand case study.解决“棘手”的健康促进问题:新西兰案例研究。
Health Promot Int. 2013 Mar;28(1):84-94. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das006. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
5
Wicked problems and a 'wicked' solution.棘手问题与“棘手”的解决方案。
Global Health. 2018 Apr 13;14(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0353-x.
6
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
7
The ethics of wicked problems: an exegesis.棘手问题的伦理学:一篇注释
Socioecol Pract Res. 2023;5(1):35-47. doi: 10.1007/s42532-022-00137-3. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
8
Advancing the science of unfinished nursing care: Exploring the benefits of cross-disciplinary knowledge exchange, knowledge integration and transdisciplinarity.推进未完护理研究的科学发展:探索跨学科知识交流、知识整合和跨学科的益处。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Apr;75(4):905-917. doi: 10.1111/jan.13948. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Ethics and health planning: implications for education.伦理与健康规划:对教育的启示
Health Policy Educ. 1981 Sep;2(2):103-17. doi: 10.1016/0165-2281(81)90009-6.
10
Psychological Antecedents of Retirement Planning: A Systematic Review.退休规划的心理前因:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 9;9:1870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01870. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's dual centrality in food security solutions: The need for a stronger gender lens in food systems' transformation.女性在粮食安全解决方案中的双重核心地位:粮食系统转型中需要更强的性别视角。
Curr Res Environ Sustain. 2021;3:100094. doi: 10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100094. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
The Need for a Food Systems Approach in Smallholder Food and Nutrition Security Initiatives: Lessons from Inclusive Agribusiness in Smallholder Communities.小农粮食与营养安全倡议中采用粮食系统方法的必要性:小农社区包容性农业综合企业的经验教训。
Foods. 2021 Jul 31;10(8):1785. doi: 10.3390/foods10081785.
3
Estimating food production in an urban landscape.估算城市景观中的食物产量。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 20;10(1):5141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62126-4.

本文引用的文献

1
From Farm to Nuisance: Animal Agriculture and the Rise of Planning Regulation.从农场到麻烦:畜牧业与规划监管的兴起
J Plan Hist. 2014 May;13(2):113-135. doi: 10.1177/1538513213507542.
2
Evaluating the Benefits of Peri-Urban Agriculture.评估城郊农业的益处。
J Plan Lit. 2012 Aug;27(3):259-269. doi: 10.1177/0885412211435172.
3
Better measurement needed to move food-environment research forward.需要更好的测量方法来推动食物环境研究的发展。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Jan;21(1):2-3. doi: 10.1002/oby.20015.
4
Pushing produce: the New York City Green Carts initiative.推广农产品:纽约市绿色手推车计划
J Urban Health. 2012 Dec;89(6):937-8. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9688-4.
5
Comparative approaches to measuring food access in urban areas: the case of Portland, Oregon.城市地区衡量食物获取的比较方法:以俄勒冈州波特兰市为例。
Urban Stud. 2011;48(8):1715-737. doi: 10.1177/0042098010375994.
6
Peak oil, food systems, and public health.峰值石油、食物系统与公共卫生。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Sep;101(9):1587-97. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300123. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
7
Resource management as a key factor for sustainable urban planning.资源管理作为可持续城市规划的关键因素。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
8
The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design.城市代谢及其在城市规划与设计中的应用研究。
Environ Pollut. 2011 Aug-Sep;159(8-9):1965-73. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.022. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
9
An analysis of public health policy and legal issues relevant to mobile food vending.关于流动食品摊贩的公共卫生政策和法律问题分析。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2038-46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.185892. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
10
The contribution of urban foodways to health disparities.城市饮食文化对健康差距的影响。
J Urban Health. 2010 May;87(3):381-93. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9441-9.