• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

曼尼托巴卫生政策中心:一项案例研究。

The manitoba centre for health policy: a case study.

作者信息

Marchessault Gail

机构信息

Independent Qualitative Health Researcher, Winnipeg, MB.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2011 Jan;6(Spec Issue):29-43.

PMID:24933371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5319571/
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (MCHP) is a university research centre with a long-standing contractual arrangement with government.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this project was to examine the facilitators and challenges in the development, establishment and continuation of MCHP.

METHODS

In-depth, semi-structured interviews with 28 participants selected purposefully and a document review were conducted and analyzed using qualitative methods.

RESULTS

Although a unique confluence of factors facilitated MCHP's establishment, participants viewed safeguards to credibility (arm's-length from government; guaranteed academic freedom) along with powerful advocates as key to longevity. Other factors that participants discussed as important to sustainability included excellence in scholarship; thorough protection of privacy; stable funding; incremental growth; teamwork; leadership; nurturing of relationships; and authentic partnerships.

CONCLUSIONS

MCHP has demonstrated that using local administrative data to address policy-related research questions is of enduring value to local and provincial communities, and also has national and international relevance.

摘要

背景

曼尼托巴卫生政策中心(MCHP)是一个与政府有着长期合同安排的大学研究中心。

目的

本项目旨在探讨MCHP发展、建立和延续过程中的促进因素和挑战。

方法

对28名有目的地挑选出的参与者进行了深入的半结构化访谈,并进行了文件审查,采用定性方法进行分析。

结果

尽管多种因素的独特融合促进了MCHP的建立,但参与者认为保障可信度(与政府保持独立;保证学术自由)以及强有力的支持者是其长久发展的关键。参与者讨论的对可持续性重要的其他因素包括学术卓越;全面保护隐私;稳定的资金;逐步增长;团队合作;领导力;培养关系;以及真正的伙伴关系。

结论

MCHP已证明,利用本地行政数据解决与政策相关的研究问题对地方和省级社区具有持久价值,并且在国家和国际上也具有相关性。

相似文献

1
The manitoba centre for health policy: a case study.曼尼托巴卫生政策中心:一项案例研究。
Healthc Policy. 2011 Jan;6(Spec Issue):29-43.
2
Population Data Centre Profile: The Manitoba Centre for Health Policy.人口数据中心简介:曼尼托巴卫生政策中心
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Feb 25;4(2):1131. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1131.
3
Partnering Healthy@Work: an Australian university-government partnership facilitating policy-relevant research.携手共创健康职场:澳大利亚大学与政府的合作推动与政策相关的研究。
Health Promot Int. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):964-976. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw033.
4
Policy context, coherence and disjuncture in the implementation of the Ideal Clinic Realisation and Maintenance programme in the Gauteng and Mpumalanga provinces of South Africa.南非豪登省和姆普马兰加省实施理想诊所实现和维持方案的政策背景、一致性和不连贯性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 3;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00567-z.
5
Building a health research relationship between First Nations and the University in Manitoba.在马尼托巴省的原住民与大学之间建立健康研究关系。
Can J Public Health. 2005 Jan-Feb;96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03405309.
6
Task shifting of HIV/AIDS case management to Community Health Service Centers in urban China: a qualitative policy analysis.中国城市地区将艾滋病病例管理工作转移至社区卫生服务中心:一项定性政策分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 2;15:253. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0924-y.
7
Straw into Gold: Lessons Learned (and Still Being Learned) at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy.化腐朽为神奇:马尼托巴省卫生政策中心的经验教训(以及仍在汲取的教训)
Healthc Policy. 2011 Jan;6(Spec Issue):44-54.
8
Introducing data into the health policy process: developing a report on the efficiency of bed use in Manitoba.将数据引入卫生政策制定过程:编写一份关于曼尼托巴省床位使用效率的报告。
Healthc Manage Forum. 1994 Summer;7(2):46-50. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)61056-3.
9
Capturing lessons learned from evidence-to-policy initiatives through structured reflection.通过结构化反思从循证政策制定中汲取经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Jan 17;12:2. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-2.
10
Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study.多机构癌症研究数据网格的安全与隐私要求:一项基于访谈的研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jun 15;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-31.

引用本文的文献

1
A profile of the Centre for Health Record Linkage.健康记录链接中心简介。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2019 Nov 29;4(2):1142. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i2.1123. eCollection 2022.
2
Closing the loop: From system-based data to evidence-influenced policy and practice.闭环:从基于系统的数据到证据影响的政策和实践。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Feb 25;6(3):1701. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i1.1701. eCollection 2021.
3
Population Data Centre Profile: The Manitoba Centre for Health Policy.人口数据中心简介:曼尼托巴卫生政策中心
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Feb 25;4(2):1131. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1131.

本文引用的文献

1
From health research to social research: privacy, methods, approaches.从健康研究到社会研究:隐私、方法与途径
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(1):117-29. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.017. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
2
Demystifying knowledge translation: learning from the community.揭开知识转化的神秘面纱:向社群学习。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Oct;10(4):203-11. doi: 10.1258/135581905774414213.
3
Establishing a population data-based policy unit.建立一个基于人口数据的政策部门。
Med Care. 1999 Jun;37(6 Suppl):JS15-26. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199906001-00006.
4
Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system.重新审视曼尼托巴省卫生政策与评估中心及其基于人群的健康信息系统。
Med Care. 1999 Jun;37(6 Suppl):JS10-4. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199906001-00005.
5
Health and health care. Experience with a population-based health information system.健康与医疗保健。基于人群的健康信息系统的经验。
Med Care. 1995 Dec;33(12 Suppl):DS1-145.
6
Elective surgical rates--do high rates mean lower standards? Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in Manitoba.择期手术率——高比率意味着更低的标准吗?马尼托巴省的扁桃体切除术和腺样体切除术
N Engl J Med. 1977 Aug 18;297(7):360-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197708182970705.
7
A new audit prodecure applied to an old question: Is the frequency of T&A justified?一种应用于老问题的新审计程序:扁桃体切除和腺样体刮除术的频率是否合理?
Med Care. 1977 Jan;15(1):1-18. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197701000-00001.