Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Diagn Pathol. 2014 Jun 16;9:118. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-118.
Ki67 is currently the proliferation biomarker of choice, with both prognostic and predictive value in breast cancer. A lack of consensus regarding Ki67 use in pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical practice may hinder its formal acceptance in the clinical setting.
One hundred breast cancer samples were stained for Ki67. A standard estimation of Ki67 using fixed denominators of 200, 400 and 1 000 counted tumor cells was performed, and a cut-off at 20% was applied, Ki67static. A novel stepwise counting strategy for Ki67 estimation, Ki67scs, was developed based on rejection regions derived from exact two-sided binomial confidence intervals for proportions. Ki67scs was defined by the following parameters: the cut-off (20%), minimum (50) and maximum (400) number of tumor cells to count, increment (10) and overall significance level of the test procedure (0.05). Results from Ki67scs were compared to results from the Ki67static estimation with fixed denominators.
For Ki67scs, the median number of tumor cells needed to determine Ki67 status was 100; the average, 175. Among 38 highly proliferative samples, the average Ki67scs fraction was 45%. For these samples, the fraction decreased from 39% to 37% to 35% with static counting of 200, 400 and 1 000 cells, respectively. The largest absolute difference between the estimation methods was 23% (42% (Ki67scs) vs. 19% (Ki67static)) and resulted in an altered sample classification. Among the 82 unequivocal samples, 74 samples received the same classification using both Ki67scs and Ki67static. Of the eight disparate samples, seven were classified highly proliferative by Ki67static when 200 cells were counted; whereas all eight cases were classified as low proliferative when 1 000 cells were counted.
Ki67 estimation using fixed denominators may be inadequate, particularly for tumors demonstrating extensive heterogeneity. We propose a time saving stepwise counting strategy, which acknowledges small highly proliferative hot spots.
The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/3588156111195336.
Ki67 目前是首选的增殖生物标志物,在乳腺癌中有预后和预测价值。在分析前、分析中和分析后实践中,Ki67 的使用缺乏共识,这可能会阻碍其在临床环境中的正式接受。
对 100 例乳腺癌样本进行 Ki67 染色。使用固定分母 200、400 和 1000 个计数肿瘤细胞对 Ki67 进行标准估计,并应用 20%的截止值 Ki67static。基于精确双边二项式置信区间的拒绝区域,开发了一种新的用于 Ki67 估计的逐步计数策略 Ki67scs。Ki67scs 由以下参数定义:截止值(20%)、最小(50)和最大(400)计数肿瘤细胞数、增量(10)和测试过程的整体显著性水平(0.05)。Ki67scs 的结果与使用固定分母的 Ki67static 估计结果进行比较。
对于 Ki67scs,确定 Ki67 状态所需的肿瘤细胞中位数为 100;平均值为 175。在 38 个高度增殖的样本中,Ki67scs 分数的平均值为 45%。对于这些样本,静态计数 200、400 和 1000 个细胞时,Ki67scs 分数分别从 39%降至 37%至 35%。两种估计方法之间的最大绝对差异为 23%(42%(Ki67scs)与 19%(Ki67static)),导致样本分类发生改变。在 82 个明确的样本中,74 个样本使用 Ki67scs 和 Ki67static 得到相同的分类。在 8 个不一致的样本中,当计数 200 个细胞时,7 个样本被 Ki67static 分类为高度增殖;而当计数 1000 个细胞时,所有 8 个病例均被分类为低度增殖。
使用固定分母的 Ki67 估计可能不充分,特别是对于表现出广泛异质性的肿瘤。我们提出了一种节省时间的逐步计数策略,该策略承认小的高度增殖热点。
本文的虚拟幻灯片可以在此处找到:http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/3588156111195336.