• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对医疗工作场所暴力问题的个人、人际关系、工作场所及社会层面的建议。

Individual, relationship, workplace, and societal recommendations for addressing healthcare workplace violence.

作者信息

Gillespie Gordon Lee, Gates Donna M, Fisher Bonnie S

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Work. 2015;51(1):67-71. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141890.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-141890
PMID:24939109
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8909741/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Workplace violence from coworkers, patients, and visitors is a problem affecting every occupational group in the health and social service sector [1-3]. Workplace violence is demonstrated by coworkers through bullying behaviors and by patients and visitors through physical threats and assaults.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to highlight the special issue authors' and guest editors' recommendations for protecting healthcare workers from being victimized and incurring the negative consequences of having experienced workplace violence.

METHODS

Recommendations from the special issue were categorized and discussed in relation to the Social-Ecological Model and the prevention efforts targeting individuals, relationships, communities, and society.

RESULTS

Individual-level recommendations focused on the personal risk reduction for healthcare workers. Relationship-level recommendations addressed the problem of bullying between coworkers and physical violence derived from patients and visitors. Workplace-level recommendations discussed a multi-faceted systems approach to violence management. Societal-level recommendations centered on a universal health policy approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a model such as the Social-Ecological Model can be helpful in planning violence prevention efforts in the healthcare setting.

摘要

背景

来自同事、患者及访客的工作场所暴力是一个影响卫生和社会服务部门每个职业群体的问题[1-3]。同事通过欺凌行为表现出工作场所暴力,患者和访客则通过身体威胁和攻击表现出来。

目的

本文旨在强调特刊作者和客座编辑提出的关于保护医护人员免受伤害以及避免遭受工作场所暴力负面影响的建议。

方法

根据社会生态模型以及针对个人、人际关系、社区和社会的预防措施,对特刊的建议进行分类和讨论。

结果

个人层面的建议侧重于降低医护人员的个人风险。人际关系层面的建议解决了同事之间的欺凌问题以及患者和访客引发的身体暴力问题。工作场所层面的建议讨论了针对暴力管理的多方面系统方法。社会层面的建议以普遍的卫生政策方法为核心。

结论

使用社会生态模型等模型有助于规划医疗环境中的暴力预防工作。

相似文献

1
Individual, relationship, workplace, and societal recommendations for addressing healthcare workplace violence.针对医疗工作场所暴力问题的个人、人际关系、工作场所及社会层面的建议。
Work. 2015;51(1):67-71. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141890.
2
Workplace violence prevention: improving front-line health-care worker and patient safety.预防工作场所暴力:提高一线医护人员和患者的安全。
New Solut. 2013 Jan 1;23(2):297-313. doi: 10.2190/NS.23.2.f.
3
ANA Sets 'Zero Tolerance' Policy for Workplace Violence, Bullying. Position Statement Calls on Health Care Employers to Implement Violence Prevention Programs.美国护士协会为职场暴力和欺凌制定“零容忍”政策。立场声明呼吁医疗保健雇主实施暴力预防计划。
Ala Nurse. 2015 Dec;42(4):17.
4
Violence in the healthcare workplace.医疗工作场所的暴力行为。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug 1;36(4):234-238. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000961. Epub 2024 May 16.
5
Strengthening a Culture to Address Bullying and Incivility in the Care Environment.强化文化建设,应对照护环境中的欺凌和粗言秽语行为。
J Nurs Adm. 2021 Oct 1;51(10):475-477. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001048.
6
Workplace Violence in Health Care-It's Not "Part of the Job".医疗保健领域的工作场所暴力——这并非“工作的一部分”。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016 Aug;71(7):427-34. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000334.
7
Environmental evaluation for workplace violence in healthcare and social services.医疗保健和社会服务领域工作场所暴力的环境评估
J Safety Res. 2008;39(2):237-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.02.028. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
8
Barriers to Effective Implementation of Programs for the Prevention of Workplace Violence in Hospitals.医院预防工作场所暴力项目有效实施的障碍
Online J Issues Nurs. 2014 Dec 4;20(1):7.
9
Creating a successful workplace violence prevention program for healthcare workers.为医护人员创建一个成功的职场暴力预防项目。
J Healthc Prot Manage. 2017;33(1):31-43.
10
Workplace violence in healthcare: strategies for advocacy.医疗保健领域的工作场所暴力:宣传策略。
Online J Issues Nurs. 2013 Jan 31;18(1):5.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational violence toward mental health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international study.新冠疫情期间针对心理健康专业人员的职业暴力:一项国际研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 20;15:1527182. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1527182. eCollection 2024.
2
Perspectives of physicians on risk factors for patient aggression and violence against physicians in Chinese hospitals: a Q-methodology study.中国医院医生对患者攻击和暴力侵害医生风险因素的看法:一项Q方法研究
Hum Resour Health. 2025 Jan 20;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12960-025-00976-7.
3
Consensus on relevant psychosocial interventions applied in health institutions to prevent psychological violence at work: Delphi method.医疗机构中应用相关心理社会干预措施预防工作场所心理暴力的共识:德尔菲法。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Jan 5;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06680-w.
4
Roles of doctor-patient relationship perception and job satisfaction in the impact of workplace violence on medical professionals' turnover intentions in the early phase of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China.在 COVID-19 早期,医患关系感知和工作满意度在工作场所暴力对医疗专业人员离职意愿的影响中的作用:中国的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 4;13(9):e074744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074744.
5
Workplace violence against emergency health care workers: What Strategies do Workers use?工作场所对急诊医护人员的暴力行为:工作人员使用了哪些策略?
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 May 6;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00621-9.
6
Judicial judgment and media sensation of violence against medical staff in China: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA).中国针对医务人员暴力事件的司法判断与媒体轰动效应:模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 22;16(10):e0259014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259014. eCollection 2021.
7
Time lost: Factors influencing advanced practice provider's prioritization of sleep.时间的流逝:影响高级实践提供者优先考虑睡眠的因素。
Work. 2021;68(3):653-665. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203400.
8
An Economic Model of Optimal Penalty for Health Care Workplace Violence.医疗保健工作场所暴力最优惩罚的经济模型。
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019884190. doi: 10.1177/0046958019884190.
9
[Aggression and subjective risk in emergency medicine : A survey].[急诊医学中的攻击行为与主观风险:一项调查]
Anaesthesist. 2016 Aug;65(8):580-4. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0202-3. Epub 2016 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Violence against Healthcare Workers in a Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科针对医护人员的暴力行为。
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2010 Jan;32(1):68-82. doi: 10.1097/tme.0b013e3181c8b0b4.
2
Perceptions of horizontal violence in staff nurses and intent to leave.注册护士对横向暴力的认知及离职意向
Work. 2015;51(1):91-7. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152015.
3
Measurable results: Reducing staff injuries on a specialty psychiatric unit for patients with developmental disabilities.
Work. 2015;51(1):99-111. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152014.
4
Using database reports to reduce workplace violence: Perceptions of hospital stakeholders.利用数据库报告减少工作场所暴力:医院利益相关者的看法
Work. 2015;51(1):51-9. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141887.
5
Staff perspectives of violence in the emergency department: Appeals for consequences, collaboration, and consistency.急诊科工作人员对暴力行为的看法:对后果、协作和一致性的呼吁。
Work. 2015;51(1):5-18. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141893.
6
Hospital staff registered nurses' perception of horizontal violence, peer relationships, and the quality and safety of patient care.医院工作人员注册护士对横向暴力、同事关系以及患者护理质量与安全的认知。
Work. 2015;51(1):29-37. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141892.
7
Workplace violence prevention for nurses on-line course: Program development.护士职场暴力预防在线课程:项目开发
Work. 2015;51(1):79-89. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141891.
8
Development of the Personal Workplace Safety Instrument for Emergency Nurses.急诊护士个人工作场所安全工具的开发。
Work. 2015;51(1):61-6. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141889.
9
Risk assessment for patient perpetrated violence: Analysis of three assaults against healthcare workers.患者实施暴力行为的风险评估:针对医护人员的三起袭击事件分析
Work. 2015;51(1):73-7. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141888.
10
Staff perceptions of workplace violence in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科工作人员对工作场所暴力的认知
Work. 2015;51(1):39-49. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141895.