Allen Stephen J, Jordan Sue, Storey Melanie, Thornton Catherine A, Gravenor Michael B, Garaiova Iveta, Plummer Susan F, Wang Duolao, Morgan Gareth
College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Arch Dis Child. 2014 Nov;99(11):1014-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305799. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
To evaluate a multistrain, high-dose probiotic in the prevention of eczema.
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial.
Antenatal clinics, research clinic, children at home.
Pregnant women and their infants.
Women from 36 weeks gestation and their infants to age 6 months received daily either the probiotic (Lactobacillus salivarius CUL61, Lactobacillus paracasei CUL08, Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis CUL34 and Bifidobacterium bifidum CUL20; total of 10(10) organisms/day) or matching placebo.
Diagnosed eczema at age 2 years. Infants were followed up by questionnaire. Clinical examination and skin prick tests to common allergens were done at 6 months and 2 years.
The cumulative frequency of diagnosed eczema at 2 years was similar in the probiotic (73/214, 34.1%) and placebo arms (72/222, 32.4%; OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.6). Among the secondary outcomes, the cumulative frequency of skin prick sensitivity at 2 years was reduced in the probiotic (18/171; 10.5%) compared with the placebo arm (32/173; 18.5%; OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.98). The statistically significant differences between the arms were mainly in sensitisation to cow's milk and hen's egg proteins at 6 months. Atopic eczema occurred in 9/171 (5.3%) children in the probiotic arm and 21/173 (12.1%) in the placebo arm (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.91).
The study did not provide evidence that the probiotic either prevented eczema during the study or reduced its severity. However, the probiotic seemed to prevent atopic sensitisation to common food allergens and so reduce the incidence of atopic eczema in early childhood.
ISRCTN26287422.
评估一种多菌株、高剂量益生菌预防湿疹的效果。
一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组试验。
产前诊所、研究诊所、儿童家中。
孕妇及其婴儿。
妊娠36周的女性及其6个月大的婴儿每天接受益生菌(唾液乳杆菌CUL61、副干酪乳杆菌CUL08、动物双歧杆菌亚种乳酸亚种CUL34和两歧双歧杆菌CUL20;共10¹⁰个微生物/天)或匹配的安慰剂。
2岁时诊断为湿疹。通过问卷调查对婴儿进行随访。在6个月和2岁时进行临床检查和对常见过敏原的皮肤点刺试验。
益生菌组(73/214,34.1%)和安慰剂组(72/222,32.4%;比值比1.07,95%可信区间0.72至1.6)2岁时诊断为湿疹的累积频率相似。在次要结局中,与安慰剂组(32/173;18.5%;比值比0.52,95%可信区间0.28至0.98)相比,益生菌组2岁时皮肤点刺敏感性的累积频率降低。两组之间具有统计学意义的差异主要在6个月时对牛奶和鸡蛋蛋白的致敏情况。益生菌组9/171(5.3%)的儿童发生特应性湿疹,安慰剂组为21/173(12.1%)(比值比0.40,95%可信区间0.18至0.91)。
该研究未提供证据表明益生菌在研究期间预防了湿疹或降低了其严重程度。然而,益生菌似乎预防了对常见食物过敏原的特应性致敏,从而降低了幼儿期特应性湿疹的发病率。
ISRCTN26287422。