• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国全国性调查中对残疾的概念化:世界卫生组织(WHO)《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)框架的应用。

Conceptualizing disability in US national surveys: application of the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework.

作者信息

Brandt Diane E, Ho Pei-Shu, Chan Leighton, Rasch Elizabeth K

机构信息

Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Blvd. Rm. 3C01 MSC 7515, Bethesda, MD, 20892-7515, USA,

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2014 Dec;23(10):2663-71. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0740-6. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-014-0740-6
PMID:24948041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10544787/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Disability data inform resource allocation and utilization, characterize functioning and changes over time, and provide a mechanism to monitor progress toward promoting and protecting the rights of individuals with disability. Data collection efforts, however, define and measure disability in varied ways. Our objective was to see how the content of disability measures differed in five US national surveys and over time.

METHODS

Using the WHO ICF as a conceptual framework for measuring disability, we assessed the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), Current Population Survey (CPS), Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), National Survey of SSI Children and Families (NSCF), and American Community Survey (ACS) for their content coverage of disability relative to each of the four ICF components (i.e., body functions, body structures, activities and participation, and environment). We used second-level ICF three-digit codes to classify question content into categories within each ICF component and computed the proportion of categories within each ICF component that was represented in the questions selected from these five surveys.

RESULTS

The disability measures varied across surveys and years. The NHIS captured a greater proportion of the ICF body functions and body structures components than did other surveys. The SIPP captured the most content of the ICF activities and participation component, and the NSCF contained the most content of the ICF environmental factors component.

CONCLUSIONS

This research successfully illustrated demonstrated the utility of the ICF in examining the content of disability measures in five national surveys and over time.

摘要

目的

残疾数据为资源分配和利用提供信息,描述功能及随时间的变化情况,并提供一种机制来监测在促进和保护残疾人权利方面的进展。然而,数据收集工作对残疾的定义和衡量方式各不相同。我们的目标是了解美国五项全国性调查中残疾衡量指标的内容差异以及随时间的变化情况。

方法

以世界卫生组织《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)作为衡量残疾的概念框架,我们评估了国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)、当前人口调查(CPS)、收入与项目参与调查(SIPP)、补充保障收入儿童与家庭全国调查(NSCF)以及美国社区调查(ACS)在残疾内容覆盖方面相对于ICF的四个组成部分(即身体功能、身体结构、活动与参与以及环境)的情况。我们使用ICF二级三位数编码将问题内容分类到每个ICF组成部分的类别中,并计算从这五项调查中选取的问题所代表的每个ICF组成部分内类别的比例。

结果

残疾衡量指标在不同调查和年份中存在差异。NHIS涵盖的ICF身体功能和身体结构组成部分的比例高于其他调查。SIPP涵盖的ICF活动与参与组成部分的内容最多,而NSCF包含的ICF环境因素组成部分的内容最多。

结论

本研究成功说明了ICF在审视五项全国性调查中残疾衡量指标的内容以及随时间变化情况方面的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8871/10544787/2eeecdc9517d/nihms-1926410-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8871/10544787/d312d9c60d24/nihms-1926410-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8871/10544787/abe99f92fbe8/nihms-1926410-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8871/10544787/2eeecdc9517d/nihms-1926410-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8871/10544787/d312d9c60d24/nihms-1926410-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8871/10544787/abe99f92fbe8/nihms-1926410-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8871/10544787/2eeecdc9517d/nihms-1926410-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Conceptualizing disability in US national surveys: application of the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework.美国全国性调查中对残疾的概念化:世界卫生组织(WHO)《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)框架的应用。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Dec;23(10):2663-71. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0740-6. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
2
Linking of the quality of life in neurological disorders (Neuro-QoL) to the international classification of functioning, disability and health.神经系统疾病生活质量(Neuro-QoL)与国际功能、残疾和健康分类的关联。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Sep;26(9):2435-2448. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1590-9. Epub 2017 May 5.
3
Development of core sets for deafblindness using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: the perspectives of individuals with lived experience.使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》制定聋盲核心数据集:有实际生活经历者的观点
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Dec;60(6):1060-1069. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08500-9. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Concept analysis of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS(®)) and the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF).患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS(®))与国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的概念分析。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Aug;23(6):1677-86. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0622-y. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
5
Measuring functioning and disability in Korea: comparing general and dedicated surveys using the ICF as a reference framework.韩国的功能与残疾测量:以《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》为参考框架比较一般性调查和专门性调查。
PLoS One. 2025 May 12;20(5):e0323616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323616. eCollection 2025.
6
Identifying content gaps in health status measures for intermittent claudication using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类法识别间歇性跛行健康状况测量中的内容差距。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Mar;67(3):868-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.062. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
7
Mapping the content of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) using the International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability.使用《国际功能、健康和残疾分类》对患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)的内容进行映射。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Nov;23(9):2431-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0691-y. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
8
Patient-reported outcome measures for physical function in cancer patients: content comparison of the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, FACT-G, and PROMIS measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.癌症患者身体功能的患者报告结局测量指标:使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类对 EORTC CAT 核心量表、EORTC QLQ-C30 量表、SF-36 量表、FACT-G 量表和 PROMIS 量表进行的内容比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 21;23(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01826-z.
9
20 Years of ICF-International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Uses and Applications around the World.20 年的 ICF-国际功能、残疾和健康分类:在世界范围内的使用和应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11321. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811321.
10
Burden of treatment in the light of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a "best fit" framework synthesis.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的治疗负担:一种“最佳匹配”框架综合分析
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(13):1253-1261. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1194898. Epub 2016 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Functioning Should Be Used as a Population Health Indicator? A Discussion of a Chilean Population Study.为何应将功能作为人群健康指标?关于一项智利人群研究的讨论。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;13(13):1606. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131606.
2
The Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile: Historical Overview and Future Directions.生活影响烧伤恢复评估(LIBRE)概况:历史回顾与未来方向。
Eur Burn J. 2025 May 14;6(2):23. doi: 10.3390/ebj6020023.
3
Insurance gaps at age-19 and age-26 health insurance eligibility thresholds by childhood-onset condition severity, Colorado 2014-2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence, characteristics, and poverty status of Supplemental Security Income multirecipients.补充保障收入多重领取者的患病率、特征及贫困状况。
Soc Secur Bull. 2013;73(3):11-21.
2
Mapping Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) items to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).将患者特定功能量表(PSFS)项目映射到国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)。
Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;92(2):310-7. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090382. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
3
How to measure what matters: development and application of guiding principles to select measurement instruments in an epidemiologic study on functioning.
2014 - 2018年科罗拉多州,按儿童期发病疾病严重程度划分的19岁和26岁医疗保险资格门槛下的保险缺口。
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60(2):e14432. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14432. Epub 2025 Jan 12.
4
The prevalence of disability and associated factors among community adults in the baseline of CHCN-BTH Cohort Study.社区成年人中残疾的流行率及其在 CHCN-BTH 队列研究基线期的相关因素。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 5;23(1):1727. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15066-3.
5
Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF).基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的长期护理工具内容比较。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 17;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03824-2.
6
Assessing the content based on ICF and quality based on COSMIN criteria of patient-reported outcome measures of functioning in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.基于 ICF 和 COSMIN 标准评估乳腺癌幸存者生存患者报告结局测量功能的内容和质量:系统评价。
Breast Cancer. 2022 May;29(3):377-393. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01340-6. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
Beyond question wording: How survey design and administration shape estimates of disability.超越问题措辞:调查设计和管理如何影响残疾估计。
Disabil Health J. 2021 Oct;14(4):101115. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101115. Epub 2021 May 15.
8
Estimates of prevalence, demographic characteristics and social factors among people with disabilities in the USA: a cross-survey comparison.美国残疾人的患病率、人口特征及社会因素估计:一项跨调查比较
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 14;8(2):e017828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017828.
9
Sexual orientation differences in functional limitations, disability, and mental health services use: Results from the 2013-2014 National Health Interview Survey.性取向在功能限制、残疾和精神卫生服务使用方面的差异:来自 2013-2014 年全国健康访谈调查的结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Dec;85(12):1111-1121. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000243. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA).跨文化调适与丹麦版短肢体功能评估问卷(SMFA)的验证。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):267-271. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1643-0. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
如何衡量重要指标:在一项关于功能的流行病学研究中选择测量工具的指导原则的制定和应用。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;90(11 Suppl 2):S29-38. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fe41.
4
Measuring disability and monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics.测量残疾状况和监测《联合国残疾人权利公约》:残疾统计华盛顿小组的工作。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 31;11 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S4.
5
Measuring common outcome measures and their concepts using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in adults with burn injury: a systematic review.采用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)测量成人烧伤损伤的常见结局测量指标及其概念:系统评价。
Burns. 2011 Sep;37(6):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 May 6.
6
The myth and reality of disability prevalence: measuring disability for research and service.残疾流行率的误区与现实:为研究和服务衡量残疾。
Disabil Health J. 2011 Jan;4(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
7
A comparative review of contemporary participation measures' psychometric properties and content coverage.当代参与测量的心理计量学特性和内容覆盖面的比较综述。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Sep;91(9 Suppl):S17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.011.
8
Measuring participation as defined by the international classification of functioning, disability and health: an evaluation of existing measures.按照《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》所定义的那样衡量参与度:对现有测量方法的评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 May;90(5):856-66. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.010.
9
ICF-based classification and measurement of functioning.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的功能分类与测量
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008 Sep;44(3):315-28.
10
Mapping the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-16) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.将卒中影响量表(SIS - 16)映射到《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》。
J Rehabil Med. 2008 Feb;40(2):102-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0141.