Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD (FG, SW, SK, OAP, CR-G, NDF, SDM, MTL, NEC); Respiratory Epidemiology, Occupational Medicine and Public Health, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK (SDM); Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (SDM, DC, PAB); Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA (AWB).
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jun 19;106(6):dju118. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju118. Print 2014 Jun.
Targeting smokers at higher lung cancer risk can improve efficiency and reduce false-positive detection in lung cancer screening. We evaluated whether time to first cigarette after waking (TTFC), a single-item measure of nicotine dependency, could improve stratification of lung cancer risk beyond standard smoking metrics (intensity, duration, and pack-years).
In 3249 ever-smokers (n = 1812 case subjects; n = 1437 control subjects) from a population-based case-control study in Italy, we examined the association between TTFC and lung cancer using logistic regression and estimated lung cancer incidence by levels of TTFC, and intensity, duration, and pack-years using absolute risk regression. Significance tests were two-sided.
Compared with smokers with TTFC greater than 60 minutes, the lung cancer odds ratios for TTFC of 31 to 60 minutes, 6 to 30 minutes, and 5 or fewer minutes (by increasing dependency) were 2.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.03 to 3.26), 2.27 (95% CI = 1.79 to 2.88), and 3.50 (95% CI = 2.64 to 4.64), respectively (P trend < .0001). The average lung cancer incidence rates for smokers of 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30 and more than 30 cigarettes per day were consistently higher among smokers with TTFC of 60 or fewer minutes vs more than 60 minutes (64.1 vs 11.7; 125.6 vs 28.6; 130.1 vs 40.7; and 260.8 vs 108.9 per 100000 person-years, respectively). The slopes of increase in lung cancer rates with smoking duration and pack-years were statistically significantly greater among smokers with higher dependency (P interaction < .001).
Lung cancer risk increases with shorter TTFC; this simple nicotine dependency measure increases lung cancer risk stratification beyond standard smoking measures. Assessing TTFC may improve lung cancer risk prediction and could be useful in lung cancer screening and smoking cessation programs.
针对肺癌风险较高的吸烟者可以提高效率,并减少肺癌筛查中的假阳性检测。我们评估了在标准吸烟指标(强度、持续时间和包年数)之外,吸烟后首次吸烟时间(TTFC)这一衡量尼古丁依赖的单一指标是否可以改善肺癌风险的分层。
在意大利一项基于人群的病例对照研究中,我们对 3249 名曾经吸烟者(病例组 1812 例,对照组 1437 例)进行了 TTFC 与肺癌之间的关联研究,采用 logistic 回归进行分析,并通过 TTFC 水平、强度、持续时间和包年数的绝对风险回归来估计肺癌的发病率。显著性检验为双侧检验。
与 TTFC 大于 60 分钟的吸烟者相比,TTFC 为 31 至 60 分钟、6 至 30 分钟和 5 分钟或更短时间的肺癌比值比(OR)分别为 2.57(95%置信区间[CI] = 2.03 至 3.26)、2.27(95%CI = 1.79 至 2.88)和 3.50(95%CI = 2.64 至 4.64)(P 趋势<0.0001)。每天吸烟 1 至 10 支、11 至 20 支、21 至 30 支和 30 支以上的吸烟者中,TTFC 为 60 分钟或更短的吸烟者的平均肺癌发病率始终高于 TTFC 大于 60 分钟的吸烟者(分别为 64.1 与 11.7;125.6 与 28.6;130.1 与 40.7;260.8 与 108.9 每 100000 人年)。在依赖程度较高的吸烟者中,随着吸烟持续时间和包年数的增加,肺癌发生率的增加斜率具有统计学意义(P 交互<0.001)。
肺癌风险随 TTFC 缩短而增加;这种简单的尼古丁依赖测量方法可在标准吸烟指标之外提高肺癌风险分层。评估 TTFC 可能会提高肺癌风险预测的准确性,并且可能有助于肺癌筛查和戒烟计划。