• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后顶叶皮层:比较回忆和熟悉度的记住/知道及来源记忆测试

The posterior parietal cortex: comparing remember/know and source memory tests of recollection and familiarity.

作者信息

Frithsen Amy, Miller Michael B

机构信息

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Building 251, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9660, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2014 Aug;61:31-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.011
PMID:24949554
Abstract

Numerous neuroimaging studies have shown a dissociation within the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC) between recollection and familiarity, with dorsal regions routinely active during familiarity and ventral regions active during recollection. The two most common methods for separating the neural correlates of these retrieval states are the remember/know paradigm and tests probing source memory. While relatively converging results have been found using these methods, the literature is lacking an adequate and direct comparison of the two procedures. We directly compared these two methodologies and found differences in both the magnitude and extent of activation within the left PPC. During familiarity, dorsal PPC regions were more strongly activated by the source test, while the remember/know test led to stronger recollection-related activations within the ventral regions of the PPC. This modulation of PPC activity is particularly important because it suggests that the neural correlates of familiarity and recollection depend on how they are operationalized. Previous assumptions that remember/know and source memory tests are functionally equivalent should therefore be re-evaluated. Additionally, any theories attempting to explain the functional role of the PPC during memory retrieval must take these differences into account.

摘要

众多神经影像学研究表明,在左后顶叶皮层(PPC)内,回忆和熟悉感之间存在分离现象,背侧区域在熟悉感期间通常活跃,而腹侧区域在回忆期间活跃。分离这些检索状态的神经关联的两种最常见方法是记住/知道范式和探测源记忆的测试。虽然使用这些方法已发现相对趋同的结果,但文献中缺乏对这两种程序的充分且直接的比较。我们直接比较了这两种方法,发现左PPC内激活的程度和范围均存在差异。在熟悉感期间,源测试对PPC背侧区域的激活更强,而记住/知道测试则导致PPC腹侧区域内与回忆相关的激活更强。PPC活动的这种调节尤为重要,因为它表明熟悉感和回忆的神经关联取决于它们的操作方式。因此,应重新评估之前关于记住/知道和源记忆测试在功能上等效的假设。此外,任何试图解释PPC在记忆检索过程中的功能作用的理论都必须考虑到这些差异。

相似文献

1
The posterior parietal cortex: comparing remember/know and source memory tests of recollection and familiarity.后顶叶皮层:比较回忆和熟悉度的记住/知道及来源记忆测试
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Aug;61:31-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
2
Distinct brain networks in recognition memory share a defined region in the precuneus.在识别记忆中,不同的大脑网络共享顶下小叶的一个特定区域。
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Nov;30(10):1947-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06973.x. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
3
What's the gist? The influence of schemas on the neural correlates underlying true and false memories.要点是什么?图式对真假记忆背后神经关联的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.023. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
4
Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched.当记忆强度相匹配时,熟悉度和回忆会产生不同的眼动、瞳孔和内侧颞叶反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Nov;50(13):3080-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
5
Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.记忆/知晓判断探究回忆程度。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):400-5. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20041.
6
Dissociating the roles of the default-mode, dorsal, and ventral networks in episodic memory retrieval.分离默认模式、背侧和腹侧网络在情景记忆检索中的作用。
Neuroimage. 2010 May 1;50(4):1648-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.051. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
7
Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: a review of neuroimaging and patient data.回忆与熟悉感的神经关联:神经影像学与患者数据综述
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 11;45(10):2163-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.007. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
8
Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity.注意力和信心对假设的与回忆及熟悉度相关的事件相关电位的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(8):1088-106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.011.
9
Dissociable parietal regions facilitate successful retrieval of recently learned and personally familiar information.顶叶的可分离区域有助于成功检索最近学习到的和个人熟悉的信息。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Mar;51(4):573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.013. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
10
Subjective recollection independent from multifeatural context retrieval following damage to the posterior parietal cortex.顶叶后部受损后独立于多特征情境检索的主观回忆。
Cortex. 2017 Jun;91:114-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic Dimensions Support the Cortical Representation of Object Memorability.语义维度支持物体记忆性的皮层表征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jun 12:1-27. doi: 10.1162/jocn.a.60.
2
Systems-level decoding reveals the cognitive and behavioral profile of the human intraparietal sulcus.系统层面的解码揭示了人类顶内沟的认知和行为特征。
Front Neuroimaging. 2023 Jan 9;1:1074674. doi: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.1074674. eCollection 2022.
3
Characterizing functional modules in the human thalamus: coactivation-based parcellation and systems-level functional decoding.
在人类丘脑的功能模块的特点:基于共激活的分区和系统水平的功能解码。
Brain Struct Funct. 2023 Nov;228(8):1811-1834. doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02603-w. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
Distinct neural mechanisms underlie subjective and objective recollection and guide memory-based decision making.不同的神经机制是主观和客观回忆的基础,并指导基于记忆的决策。
Elife. 2021 Mar 9;10:e62520. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62520.
5
Information content best characterises the hemispheric selectivity of the inferior parietal lobe: a meta-analysis.信息内容最能描述下顶叶的半球选择性:一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 15;10(1):15112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72228-8.
6
Human hippocampal CA3 damage disrupts both recent and remote episodic memories.人类海马 CA3 区损伤会破坏近期和远期情景记忆。
Elife. 2020 Jan 24;9:e41836. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41836.
7
Varieties of recollective experience.回忆体验的多样性。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 3;137:107295. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107295. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
8
Pattern Separation and Source Memory Engage Distinct Hippocampal and Neocortical Regions during Retrieval.模式分离和源记忆在检索过程中涉及不同的海马和新皮层区域。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 22;40(4):843-851. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0564-19.2019. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
9
Differential Medial Temporal Lobe and Parietal Cortical Contributions to Real-world Autobiographical Episodic and Autobiographical Semantic Memory.内侧颞叶和顶叶皮层对真实世界自传体情景和自传体语义记忆的差异贡献。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 18;8(1):6190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24549-y.
10
Ventral lateral parietal cortex and episodic memory retrieval.腹外侧顶下小叶与情景记忆提取。
Cortex. 2018 Oct;107:238-250. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 25.