Spin-Neto Rubens, Stavropoulos Andreas, Coletti Felipe L, Pereira Luís A V D, Marcantonio Elcio, Wenzel Ann
Department of Dentistry - Oral Radiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Dentistry - Periodontology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jul;26(7):747-52. doi: 10.1111/clr.12343. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
To compare cortical (AL-C) and corticocancellous (AL-CC) fresh-frozen block bone allografts to cortical block bone autografts (AT) used for lateral ridge augmentation in terms of radiographic dimensional maintenance and histomorphometrical graft remodeling.
Twenty-four patients, requiring ridge augmentation in the anterior maxilla prior to implant placement, were treated with AT, AL-C or AL-CC bone blocks (eight patients per graft type). Patients were examined with CBCT prior to, 14 days, and 6-8 months after grafting. Amount of augmentation and dimensional block graft maintenance over time was evaluated by comparing planimetric measurements of the alveolar ridge made on CBCT sections of the augmentation area. During implant installation surgery, 6-8 months after grafting, cylindrical biopsies were harvested perpendicularly to the lateral aspect of the augmented alveolar ridge. The relative volumes of vital and necrotic bone and soft tissues were histomorphometrically estimated. Comparisons among groups and observation times were performed using Friedman test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test.
Radiographic evaluation showed that the three types of grafts resulted in a significant increase in alveolar ridge width, with no significant differences among the groups in terms of ridge dimensions at the various observation times. However, significant graft resorption (P = 0.03) was observed in the AL-CC group over time (-8.3 ± 7.1%) compared with the AT and AL-C groups, where a slight increase was observed, on average (1.5 ± 20.6% and 1.3 ± 14.9%, respectively). Histomorphometrical analysis showed that larger amounts of vital bone were found in the biopsies from the AT augmented sites (25.1 ± 11.2%) compared with AL-CC and AL-C augmented sites (9.3 ± 3.8% and 3.9 ± 4.6%, respectively; P ≤ 0.01). AL-CC and AT biopsies had the smallest amount of necrotic bone (38.2 ± 12.1% and 56.7 ± 26.0, respectively) compared with AL-C (83.7 ± 10.8%, P < 0.01) biopsies. AL-CC biopsies showed the largest amount of soft tissues (52.5 ± 11.7%) compared with those from AT (18.1 ± 17.1%, P = 0.03) and AL-C (12.3 ± 8.5%, P < 0.01) sites.
AL block bone graft architecture influences significantly its dimensional incorporation and remodeling. Compared with AT bone graft, a small portion of the AL block consists of vital bone 6-8 months after grafting. Cortical AL blocks seem to show the least amounts of vital bone, while corticocancellous AL blocks seem to undergo more resorption over time.
比较皮质骨(AL-C)和皮质松质骨(AL-CC)新鲜冷冻块状骨移植与皮质块状骨自体移植(AT)用于外侧牙槽嵴增高时在影像学尺寸维持和组织形态计量学移植物重塑方面的情况。
24例在种植体植入前需要上颌前部牙槽嵴增高的患者,分别接受AT、AL-C或AL-CC骨块治疗(每种移植类型8例患者)。在移植前、移植后14天以及6至8个月时对患者进行CBCT检查。通过比较在CBCT增强区域切片上进行的牙槽嵴面积测量,评估随时间推移的增高量和块状移植物尺寸维持情况。在移植后6至8个月的种植体植入手术期间,垂直于增高后的牙槽嵴外侧获取圆柱形活检样本。通过组织形态计量学估计活骨、坏死骨和软组织的相对体积。使用Friedman检验,随后进行Dunn事后检验,对组间和观察时间进行比较。
影像学评估显示,三种类型的移植物均导致牙槽嵴宽度显著增加,在不同观察时间点,各组在牙槽嵴尺寸方面无显著差异。然而,与AT组和AL-C组相比,AL-CC组随时间观察到显著的移植物吸收(P = 0.03)(-8.3±7.1%),而AT组和AL-C组平均观察到轻微增加(分别为1.5±20.6%和1.3±14.9%)。组织形态计量学分析显示,与AL-CC组和AL-C组增高部位的活检样本相比(分别为9.3±3.8%和3.9±4.6%),AT组增高部位的活检样本中活骨量更多(25.1±11.2%;P≤0.01)。与AL-C组活检样本(83.7±10.8%,P < 0.01)相比,AL-CC组和AT组活检样本中的坏死骨量最少(分别为38.2±12.1%和56.7±26.0%)。与AT组(18.1±17.1%,P = 0.03)和AL-C组(12.3±8.5%,P < 0.01)部位相比,AL-CC组活检样本中的软组织量最大(52.5±11.7%)。
AL块状骨移植结构对其尺寸整合和重塑有显著影响。与AT骨移植相比,移植后6至8个月,AL块状骨的一小部分由活骨组成。皮质AL块状骨似乎显示出最少的活骨量,而皮质松质AL块状骨似乎随时间经历更多的吸收。