• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者满意度问卷在临终关怀住院环境中是否可用?一项试点研究。

Is the patient satisfaction questionnaire an acceptable tool for use in a hospice inpatient setting? A pilot study.

机构信息

Marie Curie Hospice Edinburgh, Frogston Road West, Edinburgh EH10 7DR, UK.

College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Jun 2;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-27. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1186/1472-684X-13-27
PMID:24959100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4066835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) is an assessment tool used to evaluate patients' perspectives of their doctor's communication and interpersonal skills. The present pilot study investigated whether the PSQ could be administered successfully in a hospice inpatient setting and if it is an acceptable tool for completion by patients and relatives in this context.

METHODS

The study was conducted in two phases. A first phase was undertaken to establish the process of PSQ administration in a hospice inpatient ward. A second phase of questionnaire administration followed by semi-structured interviews explored inpatient experiences of the questionnaire process.

RESULTS

Overall, 30 inpatients and one relative were invited to complete the PSQ across both phases of data collection, representing 53% of all inpatients at the time of data collection. The remaining 47% were deemed unsuitable to ask due to a diagnosis of dying (24%), confusion (17%), distress (3%) or lack of availability (2%). The average response rate across both phases of data collection was 87%. Qualitative interview data suggested that the PSQ was considered clear, easy to understand and not burdensome in terms of time or effort for this population.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSQ appears an acceptable tool to use in a hospice inpatient setting. Many patients welcomed the opportunity to be involved and give feedback. Using a greater proportion of relatives as an alternative source of feedback could be considered in future studies.

摘要

背景

患者满意度问卷(PSQ)是一种评估工具,用于评估患者对医生沟通和人际交往技巧的看法。本初步研究旨在调查 PSQ 是否可以成功应用于临终关怀住院环境,以及在这种情况下患者和家属是否愿意使用该工具完成问卷。

方法

该研究分两个阶段进行。第一阶段旨在确定在临终关怀住院病房中管理 PSQ 的流程。第二阶段的问卷调查后进行半结构化访谈,探索患者在问卷调查过程中的体验。

结果

在数据收集的两个阶段,共邀请了 30 名住院患者和 1 名家属完成 PSQ,占当时所有住院患者的 53%。其余 47%的患者由于临终诊断(24%)、意识混乱(17%)、痛苦(3%)或无法联系(2%)而不适合被询问。在数据收集的两个阶段,平均回复率为 87%。定性访谈数据表明,对于该人群而言,PSQ 被认为清晰易懂,在时间和精力方面负担不重。

结论

PSQ 似乎是一种可在临终关怀住院环境中使用的可接受工具。许多患者欢迎有机会参与并提供反馈。未来的研究可以考虑更多地使用家属作为替代反馈源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f7/4066835/44773c5510d3/1472-684X-13-27-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f7/4066835/44773c5510d3/1472-684X-13-27-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f7/4066835/44773c5510d3/1472-684X-13-27-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Is the patient satisfaction questionnaire an acceptable tool for use in a hospice inpatient setting? A pilot study.患者满意度问卷在临终关怀住院环境中是否可用?一项试点研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Jun 2;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-27. eCollection 2014.
2
Use of a standardized patient satisfaction questionnaire to assess the quality of care provided by ophthalmology residents.使用标准化患者满意度调查问卷评估眼科住院医师提供的护理质量。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Apr;115(4):738-743.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.033. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
3
The Challenges of Multisource Feedback: Feasibility and Acceptability of Gathering Patient Feedback for Pediatric Residents.多源反馈的挑战:为儿科住院医师收集患者反馈的可行性和可接受性。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Jul;19(5):555-560. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
An exploration of family carers' experience of respite services in one specialist palliative care unit.对一家专科姑息治疗机构中家庭照顾者的喘息服务体验的探索。
Palliat Med. 2005 Dec;19(8):610-8. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1087oa.
5
"The way I am treated is as if I am under my mother's care": qualitative study of patients' experiences of receiving hospice care services in South Africa.“我所受到的待遇就好像我还在母亲的照顾下一样”:南非患者接受临终关怀服务的体验定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 1;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00605-1.
6
A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting.探索者小组的可行性评估:确定在安全的精神科住院环境中由患者主导的研究小组的可接受性和潜在结果。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 25;7(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00310-0.
7
Race as a Predictor of Palliative Care Referral Time, Hospice Utilization, and Hospital Length of Stay: A Retrospective Noncomparative Analysis.种族作为姑息治疗转诊时间、临终关怀利用情况和住院时间的预测因素:一项回顾性非对比分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jan;35(1):110-116. doi: 10.1177/1049909116686733. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
8
Validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for services provided in Spanish community pharmacies.验证西班牙语社区药店提供的服务的患者满意度问卷。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Dec;33(6):949-57. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9566-2. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
When a dying patient is asked to participate in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on symptom control: The decision-making process and experiences of relatives.当一位临终患者被要求参与一项关于症状控制的双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验时:亲属的决策过程和体验。
Palliat Med. 2022 Dec;36(10):1552-1558. doi: 10.1177/02692163221127557.

引用本文的文献

1
Description of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for hospitalised patients with palliative care needs and their families, and how these map to noted areas of importance for quality care: A systematic review.描述有姑息治疗需求的住院患者及其家属的患者报告体验测量(PREMs),以及这些测量如何映射到护理质量的重要关注领域:系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2023 Jul;37(7):898-914. doi: 10.1177/02692163231169319. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
2
Evaluation of an online tool about the expected course of disease for glioblastoma patients-A qualitative study.胶质母细胞瘤患者疾病预期病程在线工具的评估——一项定性研究。
Neurooncol Pract. 2022 May 4;9(5):411-419. doi: 10.1093/nop/npac033. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature.患者、护理人员、卫生专业人员和研究人员对生命末期参与研究的看法和经验:文献的批判性综合分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Aug 17;12:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-123.
2
Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users.服务使用者参与癌症护理:对服务使用者的影响。
Health Expect. 2011 Jun;14(2):159-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00627.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
3
Review: a narrative review of the published ethical debates in palliative care research and an assessment of their adequacy to inform research governance.
Transition of pediatric patients with an Auto-inflammatory Disease: an alternative version of the myth.
患有自身炎症性疾病的儿科患者的转变:神话的另一个版本。
Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2018 Sep 27;29(3):156-162. doi: 10.31138/mjr.29.3.156. eCollection 2018 Sep.
4
Patient empowerment, what does it mean for adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: A systematic review using critical interpretive synthesis.患者赋权,对于生命末期的成年人意味着什么:使用批判解释性综合方法的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1288-1304. doi: 10.1177/0269216318783919. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
5
An innovative nonpharmacological intervention combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia increased patient global improvement in pain and satisfaction after major surgery.一种创新的非药物干预措施与静脉自控镇痛相结合,提高了大手术后患者在疼痛和满意度方面的整体改善情况。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Apr 6;13:1033-1042. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S131517. eCollection 2017.
6
Gaining an accurate reflection of the reality of palliative care through the use of free-text feedback in questionnaires: the AFTER study.通过在问卷中使用自由文本反馈来准确反映姑息治疗的实际情况:AFTER研究
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Mar;9(1):e17. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000920. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
综述:对已发表的姑息治疗研究中伦理争议的叙述性综述,以及对其充分性的评估,以告知研究治理。
Palliat Med. 2010 Mar;24(2):111-26. doi: 10.1177/0269216309352714. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
4
What do palliative care patients and their relatives think about research in palliative care?-a systematic review.姑息治疗患者及其家属对姑息治疗研究的看法如何?——系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Aug;18(8):905-11. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0724-1. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
5
Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult?在一项基于初级保健的姑息治疗研究中招募患者:为何如此困难?
Palliat Med. 2004 Jul;18(5):452-9. doi: 10.1191/0269216304pm905oa.
6
Research sensitivities to palliative care patients.研究姑息治疗患者的敏感性。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002 Sep;11(3):220-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00343.x.
7
Ethical issues in palliative care research.姑息治疗研究中的伦理问题。
Palliat Med. 1994 Oct;8(4):298-305. doi: 10.1177/026921639400800405.