• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息治疗研究中的伦理问题。

Ethical issues in palliative care research.

作者信息

de Raeve L

机构信息

Centre for Philosophy and Health Care, University College of Swansea, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 1994 Oct;8(4):298-305. doi: 10.1177/026921639400800405.

DOI:10.1177/026921639400800405
PMID:7529102
Abstract

Much has been written about the ethics of experimental research upon human subjects, particularly where such subjects can be said to be in a vulnerable position in relation to the researcher. This paper attempts to address such questions with reference to people who are dying. A case is made to defend the view that no research is morally justifiable with this client group. Less extreme views are also explored. One justification for such research activity comes from a rights-based perspective and another from the weighing of benefits and harms. In the process of exploring these issues, the author attempts to demonstrate that no research methodology can be said to be benign.

摘要

关于以人类为对象的实验研究的伦理问题,已有诸多著述,尤其是当这些对象相对于研究者而言可被认为处于弱势地位时。本文试图针对濒死之人探讨此类问题。有人提出理由来捍卫这样一种观点,即对这一客户群体进行任何研究在道德上都是不合理的。同时也探讨了不那么极端的观点。此类研究活动的一种正当理由来自基于权利的视角,另一种则来自对利弊的权衡。在探讨这些问题的过程中,作者试图表明,没有任何研究方法可被认为是无害的。

相似文献

1
Ethical issues in palliative care research.姑息治疗研究中的伦理问题。
Palliat Med. 1994 Oct;8(4):298-305. doi: 10.1177/026921639400800405.
2
Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research: how do we respect autonomy?质性研究中的伦理困境:我们如何尊重自主性?
NATNEWS. 1993 Jan;2(10 Suppl):S1-5.
3
Ethical considerations in qualitative research with hospice patients.
Qual Health Res. 1992 May;2(2):238-49. doi: 10.1177/104973239200200207.
4
Basic ethical principles in the conduct of biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects.涉及人类受试者的生物医学和行为研究中的基本伦理原则。
Tex Rep Biol Med. 1979;38:139-68.
5
Ethical aspects of phenomenological research with mentally ill people.对精神病患者进行现象学研究的伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 1997 Jan;4(1):49-56. doi: 10.1177/096973309700400106.
6
Ethical issues in clinical research. Informed consent and risks versus benefits in the treatment of primary hypertension.临床研究中的伦理问题。原发性高血压治疗中的知情同意以及风险与获益
Nurs Clin North Am. 1989 Dec;24(4):1033-9.
7
Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice.人体实验中的知情同意:弥合伦理思想与当前实践之间的差距。
UCLA Law Rev. 1986 Oct;34(1):67-130.
8
Ethical considerations in qualitative research.质性研究中的伦理考量
West J Nurs Res. 1988 Apr;10(2):150-62. doi: 10.1177/019394598801000204.
9
Cross-cultural ethics in the conduct of deafness research.聋病研究中的跨文化伦理
Rehabil Psychol. 1992 Summer;37(2):87-101.
10
Deception in social research I: kinds of deception and the wrongs they may involve.社会研究中的欺骗行为I:欺骗的种类及其可能涉及的不当之处。
IRB. 1982 Nov;4(9):1-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Vulnerability in Biomedical Research: A Historical Reflection and Practical Implications for HIV Cure-Related Research.生物医学研究中的脆弱性:历史反思及对艾滋病治愈相关研究的实际影响
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2024 Jan;40(1):22-27. doi: 10.1089/AID.2022.0136. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
2
Ethical and practical considerations for HIV cure-related research at the end-of-life: a qualitative interview and focus group study in the United States.终末期与 HIV 治愈相关研究的伦理与实践考量:美国的定性访谈和焦点小组研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 11;23(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00741-8.
3
Managing uncertain recovery for patients nearing the end of life in hospital: a mixed-methods feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of the AMBER care bundle.
管理接近生命终点的住院患者的不确定康复:AMBER 护理包的混合方法可行性聚类随机对照试验。
Trials. 2019 Aug 16;20(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3612-0.
4
Community-based participatory research: understanding a promising approach to addressing knowledge gaps in palliative care.基于社区的参与性研究:理解一种解决姑息治疗知识差距的有前景的方法。
Ann Palliat Med. 2016 Jul;5(3):218-24. doi: 10.21037/apm.2016.05.03.
5
Considerations and recommendations for conducting qualitative research interviews with palliative and end-of-life care patients in the home setting: a consensus paper.关于在家中对姑息治疗和临终关怀患者进行定性研究访谈的考量与建议:一份共识文件。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Mar;9(1):e14. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000892. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Promoting an ethic of engagement in pediatric palliative care research.在儿科姑息治疗研究中倡导参与伦理。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Oct 16;14:50. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0048-5.
7
Music therapy to promote psychological and physiological relaxation in palliative care patients: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.音乐疗法促进姑息治疗患者的心理和生理放松:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Dec 17;13(1):60. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-60. eCollection 2014.
8
Is the patient satisfaction questionnaire an acceptable tool for use in a hospice inpatient setting? A pilot study.患者满意度问卷在临终关怀住院环境中是否可用?一项试点研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Jun 2;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-27. eCollection 2014.
9
Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards.姑息治疗研究的伦理行为:加强研究者与机构审查委员会之间的沟通
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Dec;48(6):1211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 May 28.
10
Ethical challenges and solutions regarding delirium studies in palliative care.姑息治疗中谵妄研究的伦理挑战与解决方案。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Aug;48(2):259-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Dec 31.