Suppr超能文献

老年人骨质疏松性椎体骨折的主要手术治疗:前路脊柱融合术、前后联合手术及后路闭合楔形截骨术的比较

Major surgical treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the elderly: a comparison of anterior spinal fusion, anterior-posterior combined surgery and posterior closing wedge osteotomy.

作者信息

Takenaka Shota, Mukai Yoshihiro, Hosono Noboru, Fuji Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Community Health care Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2014 Jun;8(3):322-30. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.322. Epub 2014 Jun 9.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PURPOSE

To clarify the differences among the three major surgeries for osteoporotic vertebral fractures based on the clinical and radiological results.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Minimally invasive surgery like balloon kyphoplasty has been used to treat osteoporotic vertebral fractures, but major surgery is necessary for severely impaired patients. However, there are controversies on the surgical procedures.

METHODS

The clinical and radiographic results of patients who underwent major surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fracture were retrospectively compared, among anterior spinal fusion (group A, 9 patients), single-stage combined anterior-posterior procedure (group AP, 8 patients) and posterior closing wedge osteotomy (group P, 9 patients). Patients who underwent revision surgery were evaluated just before the revision surgery, and the other patients were evaluated at the final follow-up examination, which was defined as the end point of the evaluations for the comparison.

RESULTS

The operation time was significantly longer in group AP than in the other two groups. The postoperative correction of kyphosis was significantly greater in group P than in group A. Although the differences were not significant, better outcomes were obtained in group P in: back pain relief at the end point; ambulatory ability at the end point; and average loss of correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior closing wedge osteotomy demonstrated better surgical results than the anterior spinal fusion procedure and the single-stage combined anterior-posterior procedure.

摘要

研究设计

一项回顾性研究。

目的

基于临床和影像学结果阐明骨质疏松性椎体骨折三种主要手术方式之间的差异。

文献综述

诸如球囊后凸成形术之类的微创手术已被用于治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折,但对于严重受损的患者则需要进行大手术。然而,手术方法存在争议。

方法

回顾性比较接受骨质疏松性椎体骨折大手术的患者的临床和影像学结果,这些患者分为前路脊柱融合术组(A组,9例患者)、一期前后联合手术组(AP组,8例患者)和后路闭合楔形截骨术组(P组,9例患者)。接受翻修手术的患者在翻修手术前进行评估,其他患者在最终随访检查时进行评估,最终随访检查被定义为比较评估的终点。

结果

AP组的手术时间明显长于其他两组。P组术后后凸畸形的矫正明显大于A组。尽管差异不显著,但P组在以下方面获得了更好的结果:终点时的背痛缓解情况;终点时的行走能力;以及平均矫正丢失情况。

结论

后路闭合楔形截骨术的手术结果优于前路脊柱融合术和一期前后联合手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0259/4068852/9b30f5cb5e21/asj-8-322-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验