Xi Lei, Liu Yi, Zhao Feng, Chen Chuan, Cheng Bing
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun 18;7(3):446-51. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.11. eCollection 2014.
To assess patients' visual performance with glistenings in one piece soft hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) (Alcon) 2 years postoperatively.
This cross section trial included 120 eyes with one piece IOL at 2 years postoperatively. Glistening was classified in 4 groups, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (most evident) according to their severity in IOLs optics observed under a slit lamp. All eyes underwent a uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity evaluation (UCVA and BCVA, LogMAR scale), a complete clinical examination, a contrast sensitivity (CS) evaluation by F.A.C.T chart, and a visual field test by Humphrey Field Analyzer ‖ (HFA). One-way ANOVA was used for quantitative data, while Pearson χ (2) test was used for qualitative data to analyze the visual function of 4 glistening groups.
Totally 120 eyes were enrolled with 30 eyes in each glistening group. There was no statistical correlation between glistening grades and patients' age, IOLs power, postoperative UCVA and BCVA (P>0.05). Quantificationally, CS values among each group were not statistically different. However, qualitative analysis showed there were more eyes in grade 3 group than in grade 0 group having abnormally declined CS at high spatial frequency (10% vs 36.7% at 18 cpd, P=0.029; 6.7% vs 26.7% at 12 cpd, P=0.013). Mean deviation (MD) of the visual field test was -2.14±2.31, -1.97±2.23, -3.02±3.17, -4.12±3.38 in group 0 to 3 respectively. There was a significant decrease in the most serious glistenings group (P =0.018).
Glistenings may potentially have an impact on contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequency and MD in visual field test.
评估一体式软性疏水丙烯酸人工晶状体(IOL,爱尔康公司生产)植入术后2年患者的视觉表现。
本横断面试验纳入了120只接受一体式IOL植入术后2年的眼睛。根据裂隙灯下观察到的IOL光学部的闪光严重程度,将闪光分为4组,范围从0级(无)到3级(最明显)。所有眼睛均接受了未矫正和最佳矫正视力评估(UCVA和BCVA,LogMAR视力表)、全面的临床检查、使用F.A.C.T图表进行的对比敏感度(CS)评估以及使用Humphrey视野分析仪‖(HFA)进行的视野测试。定量数据采用单因素方差分析,定性数据采用Pearson χ²检验,以分析4个闪光组的视觉功能。
共纳入120只眼睛,每个闪光组30只。闪光分级与患者年龄、IOL度数、术后UCVA和BCVA之间无统计学相关性(P>0.05)。定量分析显示,各组之间的CS值无统计学差异。然而,定性分析表明,3级组中在高空间频率下CS异常下降的眼睛比0级组更多(18 cpd时为10%对36.7%,P=0.029;12 cpd时为6.7%对26.7%,P=0.013)。视野测试的平均偏差(MD)在0至3组中分别为-2.14±2.31、-1.97±2.23、-3.02±3.17、-4.12±3.38。最严重闪光组有显著下降(P =0.018)。
闪光可能对高空间频率下的对比敏感度和视野测试中的MD有潜在影响。