Kozey Keadle Sarah, Lyden Kate, Staudenmayer John, Hickey Amanda, Viskochil Richard, Braun Barry, Freedson Patty S
a Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2014 Jul;39(7):770-80. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0379. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
This pilot study examined if the combination of exercise training and reducing sedentary time (ST) results in greater changes to health markers than either intervention alone. Fifty-seven overweight/obese participants (19 males/39 females) (mean ± SD; age, 43.6 ± 9.9 years; body mass index (BMI), 35.1 ± 4.6 kg·m(-2)) completed the 12-week study and were randomly assigned to (i) EX: exercise 5 days·week(-1) for 40 min·session(-1) at moderate intensity; (ii) rST: reduce ST and increase nonexercise physical activity; (iii) EX-rST: combination of EX and rST; and (iv) CON: maintain behavior. Fasting lipids, blood pressure (BP), peak oxygen uptake, BMI, and 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests were completed pre- and post-intervention. EX and EX-rST increased peak oxygen uptake by ∼10% and decreased systolic BP (both p < 0.001). BMI decreased by -3.3% (95% confidence interval: -4.6% to -1.9%) for EX-rST and -2.2% (-3.5% to 0.0%) for EX. EX-rST significantly increased composite insulin-sensitivity index by 17.8% (2.8% to 32.8%) and decreased insulin area under the curve by 19.4% (-31.4% to -7.3%). No other groups improved in insulin action variables. rST group decreased ST by 7% (∼50 min·day(-1)); however, BP was the only health-related outcome that improved. EX and EX-rST improved peak oxygen uptake and BMI, providing further evidence that moderate-intensity exercise is beneficial. The within-group analysis provides preliminary evidence that exercising and reducing ST may result in improvements in metabolic biomarkers that are not seen with exercise alone, though between-group differences did not reach statistical significance. Future studies, with larger samples, should examine health-related outcomes resulting from greater reductions in ST over longer intervention periods.
这项初步研究探讨了运动训练与减少久坐时间(ST)相结合是否比单独进行任何一种干预对健康指标产生更大的变化。57名超重/肥胖参与者(19名男性/39名女性)(均值±标准差;年龄,43.6±9.9岁;体重指数(BMI),35.1±4.6kg·m⁻²)完成了为期12周的研究,并被随机分配到:(i)EX组:每周5天进行运动,每次40分钟,强度为中等;(ii)rST组:减少久坐时间并增加非运动性身体活动;(iii)EX-rST组:EX与rST相结合;以及(iv)CON组:维持原有行为。在干预前后分别完成空腹血脂、血压(BP)、峰值摄氧量、BMI以及2小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验。EX组和EX-rST组的峰值摄氧量增加了约10%,收缩压降低(均p<0.001)。EX-rST组的BMI下降了-3.3%(95%置信区间:-4.6%至-1.9%),EX组下降了-2.2%(-3.5%至0.0%)。EX-rST组的综合胰岛素敏感性指数显著增加了17.8%(2.8%至32.8%),胰岛素曲线下面积减少了19.4%(-31.4%至-7.3%)。其他组在胰岛素作用变量方面没有改善。rST组的久坐时间减少了7%(约每天50分钟);然而,血压是唯一得到改善的与健康相关的结果。EX组和EX-rST组改善了峰值摄氧量和BMI,进一步证明中等强度运动有益。组内分析提供了初步证据,即运动和减少久坐时间可能会使代谢生物标志物得到改善,而单独运动则不会出现这种情况,尽管组间差异未达到统计学显著性。未来更大样本量的研究应考察在更长干预期内更大程度减少久坐时间所带来的与健康相关的结果。