Eskenazi Michael A, Folk Jocelyn R
Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44224, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):537-42. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0682-6.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether words are processed differently when they are fixated during silent reading than when they are skipped. According to a serial processing model of eye movement control (e.g., EZ Reader) skipped words are fully processed (Reichle, Rayner, Pollatsek, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(04):445-476, 2003), whereas in a parallel processing model (e.g., SWIFT) skipped words do not need to be fully processed (Engbert, Nuthmann, Richter, Kliegl, Psychological Review, 112(4):777-813, 2005). Participants read 34 sentences with target words embedded in them while their eye movements were recorded. All target words were three-letter, low-frequency, and unpredictable nouns. After the reading session, participants completed a repetition priming lexical decision task with the target words from the reading session included as the repetition prime targets, with presentation of those same words during the reading task acting as the prime. When participants skipped a word during the reading session, their reaction times on the lexical decision task were significantly longer (M = 656.42 ms) than when they fixated the word (M = 614.43 ms). This result provides evidence that skipped words are sometimes not processed to the same degree as fixated words during reading.
本研究的目的是调查在默读过程中注视单词与跳过单词时,单词的处理方式是否存在差异。根据眼动控制的串行处理模型(例如EZ Reader),跳过的单词会被完全处理(赖克尔、雷纳、波拉特塞克,《行为与脑科学》,26(04):445 - 476,2003),而在并行处理模型(例如SWIFT)中,跳过的单词无需被完全处理(恩格伯特、努特曼、里希特、克利格尔,《心理学评论》,112(4):777 - 813,2005)。参与者阅读34个嵌入了目标单词的句子,同时记录他们的眼动。所有目标单词均为三个字母的低频且不可预测的名词。阅读环节结束后,参与者完成一项重复启动词汇判断任务,将阅读环节中的目标单词作为重复启动目标,阅读任务中这些单词的呈现作为启动刺激。当参与者在阅读环节跳过一个单词时,他们在词汇判断任务上的反应时间(M = 656.42毫秒)显著长于他们注视该单词时的反应时间(M = 614.43毫秒)。这一结果表明,在阅读过程中,跳过的单词有时没有得到与注视单词相同程度的处理。