Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jul;39(4):1311-20. doi: 10.1037/a0030910. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
The question of why readers sometimes skip words has important theoretical implications for our understanding of perception, cognition, and oculomotor control during reading (Drieghe, Rayner, & Pollatsek, 2005). In this article, the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading (Reichle, 2011) was used to examine the behavioral consequences of word skipping on fixation durations. The simulations suggest that skipping "cost," or inflated fixation durations immediately prior to skips, is modulated by the lexical properties of the upcoming word (i.e., longer fixations before skipping infrequent and/or long words; Kliegl & Engbert, 2005) but that contrary to previous claims (e.g., Reichle & Laurent, 2006), "accidental" skips due to motor error also produce skipping cost. In contrast, the cost associated with having skipped a word was not modulated by that word's properties. These simulations suggest that skipping behavior is even more complicated than previously has been assumed and that further empirical research is needed to understand the causal link between skipping and its associated cost.
读者有时会跳过单词,这一问题对于我们理解阅读过程中的感知、认知和眼球运动控制具有重要的理论意义(Drieghe、Rayner 和 Pollatsek,2005)。在本文中,我们使用 E-Z 读者阅读眼动控制模型(Reichle,2011)来考察跳读行为对注视持续时间的行为后果。模拟结果表明,跳读“代价”(即跳过单词之前的注视时间延长)受到即将到来单词的词汇属性的调节(例如,跳过不常见或长单词之前的注视时间较长;Kliegl 和 Engbert,2005),但与之前的说法(例如,Reichle 和 Laurent,2006)相反,由于运动错误导致的“偶然”跳读也会产生跳读代价。相比之下,与跳过单词相关的代价不受该单词属性的调节。这些模拟结果表明,跳读行为比之前假设的更为复杂,需要进一步的实证研究来理解跳读及其相关代价之间的因果关系。