Suppr超能文献

使用 E-Z 阅读仪检查阅读时的跳字现象。

Using E-Z reader to examine word skipping during reading.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jul;39(4):1311-20. doi: 10.1037/a0030910. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

Abstract

The question of why readers sometimes skip words has important theoretical implications for our understanding of perception, cognition, and oculomotor control during reading (Drieghe, Rayner, & Pollatsek, 2005). In this article, the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading (Reichle, 2011) was used to examine the behavioral consequences of word skipping on fixation durations. The simulations suggest that skipping "cost," or inflated fixation durations immediately prior to skips, is modulated by the lexical properties of the upcoming word (i.e., longer fixations before skipping infrequent and/or long words; Kliegl & Engbert, 2005) but that contrary to previous claims (e.g., Reichle & Laurent, 2006), "accidental" skips due to motor error also produce skipping cost. In contrast, the cost associated with having skipped a word was not modulated by that word's properties. These simulations suggest that skipping behavior is even more complicated than previously has been assumed and that further empirical research is needed to understand the causal link between skipping and its associated cost.

摘要

读者有时会跳过单词,这一问题对于我们理解阅读过程中的感知、认知和眼球运动控制具有重要的理论意义(Drieghe、Rayner 和 Pollatsek,2005)。在本文中,我们使用 E-Z 读者阅读眼动控制模型(Reichle,2011)来考察跳读行为对注视持续时间的行为后果。模拟结果表明,跳读“代价”(即跳过单词之前的注视时间延长)受到即将到来单词的词汇属性的调节(例如,跳过不常见或长单词之前的注视时间较长;Kliegl 和 Engbert,2005),但与之前的说法(例如,Reichle 和 Laurent,2006)相反,由于运动错误导致的“偶然”跳读也会产生跳读代价。相比之下,与跳过单词相关的代价不受该单词属性的调节。这些模拟结果表明,跳读行为比之前假设的更为复杂,需要进一步的实证研究来理解跳读及其相关代价之间的因果关系。

相似文献

1
Using E-Z reader to examine word skipping during reading.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jul;39(4):1311-20. doi: 10.1037/a0030910. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
2
Inhibitory neighbor priming effects in eye movements during reading.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Feb;16(1):43-50. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.43.
3
Reading skill and word skipping: Implications for visual and linguistic accounts of word skipping.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov;41(6):1923-8. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000156. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
5
The effect of high- and low-frequency previews and sentential fit on word skipping during reading.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jul;40(4):1181-203. doi: 10.1037/a0036396. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
6
Processing the in the parafovea: are articles skipped automatically?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):649-62. doi: 10.1037/a0029294. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
7
Skipped words and fixated words are processed differently during reading.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):537-42. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0682-6.
9
10
Word skipping: Effects of word length, predictability, spelling and reading skill.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jan;71(1):250-259. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310264.

引用本文的文献

2
Aging and word predictability during reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jan;87(1):50-75. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02981-9. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
3
A beginner's guide to eye tracking for psycholinguistic studies of reading.
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 22;57(2):68. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02572-4.
4
Auditory distraction during reading: Investigating the effects of background sounds on parafoveal processing.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jun;78(6):1017-1040. doi: 10.1177/17470218241269327. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
5
Prediction as a basis for skilled reading: insights from modern language models.
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jun 15;9(6):211837. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211837. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Neural evidence for lexical parafoveal processing.
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 2;12(1):5234. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25571-x.
7
The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jun;45(6):812-825. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000644.
8
Failure to detect function word repetitions and omissions in reading: Are eye movements to blame?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):340-346. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1492-z.
10
Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Dec;42(12):2039-2067. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000270. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.
Vis cogn. 2012 Apr;20(4-5):391-421. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2012.670143. Epub 2012 May 23.
2
Parafoveal processing in reading.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):5-35. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2.
3
The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):736-41. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0105-x.
4
Eye movements and word skipping during reading: effects of word length and predictability.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):514-28. doi: 10.1037/a0020990.
5
Eye movements during reading of randomly shuffled text.
Vision Res. 2010 Nov 23;50(23):2600-16. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
6
Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
7
Foveal processing and word skipping during reading.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):856-60. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.4.856.
8
Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Aug;61(8):1239-49. doi: 10.1080/17470210701467953.
9
Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006).
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):520-9; discussion 530-7. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.520.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验