Suppr超能文献

关于快速阅读者和慢速阅读者的正向推理。一项眼动研究。

On forward inferences of fast and slow readers. An eye movement study.

作者信息

Hawelka Stefan, Schuster Sarah, Gagl Benjamin, Hutzler Florian

机构信息

Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2015 Feb 13;5:8432. doi: 10.1038/srep08432.

Abstract

Unimpaired readers process words incredibly fast and hence it was assumed that top-down processing, such as predicting upcoming words, would be too slow to play an appreciable role in reading. This runs counter the major postulate of the predictive coding framework that our brain continually predicts probable upcoming sensory events. This means, it may generate predictions about the probable upcoming word during reading (dubbed forward inferences). Trying to asses these contradictory assumptions, we evaluated the effect of the predictability of words in sentences on eye movement control during silent reading. Participants were a group of fluent (i.e., fast) and a group of speed-impaired (i.e., slow) readers. The findings indicate that fast readers generate forward inferences, whereas speed-impaired readers do so to a reduced extent - indicating a significant role of predictive coding for fluent reading.

摘要

未受损的读者处理单词的速度极快,因此人们认为自上而下的处理过程,比如预测即将出现的单词,速度太慢,在阅读中无法发挥显著作用。这与预测编码框架的主要假设相悖,该框架认为我们的大脑会持续预测可能即将发生的感官事件。这意味着,在阅读过程中大脑可能会生成关于即将出现的可能单词的预测(称为向前推理)。为了评估这些相互矛盾的假设,我们研究了句子中单词的可预测性对默读时眼动控制的影响。参与者分为一组阅读流畅(即速度快)的读者和一组阅读速度受损(即速度慢)的读者。研究结果表明,阅读速度快的读者会进行向前推理,而阅读速度受损的读者进行向前推理的程度较低——这表明预测编码在流畅阅读中起着重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51b2/4327408/89012220ee66/srep08432-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验